| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:Institut vrnitve v prejšnje stanje v pravdnem postopku s primeri iz sodne prakse
Authors:ID Kumelj, Ksenija (Author)
ID Ivanc, Tjaša (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf UN_Kumelj_Ksenija_2016.pdf (842,98 KB)
MD5: E5EC00FF962C64C96A85429C26E1468F
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Undergraduate thesis
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:PF - Faculty of Law
Abstract:Vrnitev v prejšnje stanje je institut civilnega pravdnega postopka, ki temelji na načelu kontradiktornosti oziroma načelu zaslišanja obeh strank. Zakon daje strankam in drugim udeležencem v postopku možnost uveljavljanja svojih interesov. Če stranka zamudi narok ali rok za določeno procesno dejanje, zaradi česar izgubi pravico opraviti to dejanje (prekluzija), ji sodišče na njen predlog dovoli, da opravi to procesno dejanje tudi kasneje. Institut vrnitve v prejšnje stanje torej omogoča odpravo posledic zamude in vrnitev pravde v stanje, v kakršnem je bila pred zamudo. S tem se v pravdnem postopku zagotovi sodno varstvo tistemu, ki je pravi nosilec pravice materialnega prava, hkrati pa se poskrbi, da sodna odločba ni le posledica strankine nezakrivljene zamude. Gre torej za vzpostavitev ravnovesja med zagotavljanjem sodnega varstva ter med pospešitvijo postopka. V diplomski nalogi predstavim teoretična izhodišča omenjenega instituta, načela pravdnega postopka, ki so preko instituta vrnitve v prejšnje stanje v pravdnem postopku okrepljena. preučim relevantno sodno prakso in predstavim glavne značilnosti ureditve instituta v hrvaški zakonodaji. Zaključim, da med slovensko in hrvaško zakonodajo na tem področju ni večje diskrepance, kar je glede na skupno zakonodajo iz časa Jugoslavije pričakovati. Slednja namreč glede ureditve vrnitve v prejšnje stanje ni bila deležna večjih sprememb. Predstavim pa tudi, kako se v slovenski zakonodajni ureditvi krepi pomen načela kontradiktornosti.
Keywords:vrnitev v prejšnje stanje, načelo kontradiktornosti, civilni pravdni postopek, zamuda procesnega dejanja, prekluzija
Place of publishing:Maribor
Publisher:[K. Kumelj]
Year of publishing:2016
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-63158 New window
UDC:347.95(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:5253163 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:YNQ7NA3M
Publication date in DKUM:18.11.2016
Views:2766
Downloads:355
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:PF
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Institution of reinstatement in civil proceedings with emphasis on case law
Abstract:Reinstatement is a legal instrument used in civil contentious procedures and is based on adversarial principal or in other words on principle of hearing both parties. The parties and other participants of the procedure have a legally based right to implement their own interests. When a party misses a hearing or a deadline to implement a certain procedural action and therefore no longer has a right to implement this action again (preclusion), the court can grant a motion to implement that same procedural action after the omission. Reinstatement therefore makes it possible to eliminate the consequences that have occured because of that omission and it restores the contentious procedure to where it was prior to the omission. By allowing this, judicial protection in contentious procedures is given to the proper holder of a substantive right and at the same time it guarantees that the court's judgement is not based merely on an omission that was not caused by the party of a procedure. This strikes a balance between ensuring legal protection and speeding up the procedure. In my thesis I present the theoretical basis of the said institute and the principles of contentious procedure which are reinforced by the use of the reinstatement. I examine relevant case law and outline the main characteristics of this instrument in Croatian law. I conclude that the Slovenian and Croatian legislation in this area lack discrepancy, which is to be expected based on our common legislation from the time of Yugoslavia. The latter has not been changed significantly when it comes to reinstatement. I also present how the importance of the adversarial principle is reinforced in Slovenian legislation.
Keywords:reinstatement, adversarial principle, civil contentious procedure, omission of a procedural action, preclusion


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica