Gradbena pogodba v slovenskem in italijanskem pravu

Fakin, Borut

| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

First page > Show document

Show document

Title:	Gradbena pogodba v slovenskem in italijanskem pravu
Authors:	ID Fakin, Borut (Author) ID Kranjc, Vesna (Mentor) More about this mentor...
Files:	UN_Fakin_Borut_2016.pdf (320,82 KB) MD5: 245A79362E5F01F02853292532FBE7E4
Language:	Slovenian
Work type:	Undergraduate thesis
Typology:	2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:	PF - Faculty of Law
Abstract:	Diplomsko delo obravnava poglavitne razlike med slovensko in italijansko ureditvijo gradbene pogodbe med osebami zasebnega prava, kot je urejena v slovenskem Obligacijskem zakoniku (v nadaljevanju OZ) in italijanskem Codice civile. V obeh ureditvah je gradbena pogodba urejena v posebnem delu in je podvrsta podjemne pogodbe. Ureditvi sta si v bistvenem podobni, pri obeh gre za obligacijo uspeha (rezultata) med naročnikom in izvajalcem kot strankama pogodbe, pri čemer se izvajalec zaveže opraviti določeno (gradbeno) delo, naročnik pa mu mora to plačati. Codice civile kot bistvene sestavine ne določa roka za izvedbo del (zgolj ceno in dela), plačilo mora biti vsaj delno v denarju, pogodba pa je pod določenimi pogoji lahko sklenjena tudi ustno, medtem ko slovenski OZ za gradbeno pogodbo določa obveznost pisne oblike ter ceno, rok in opredelitev gradbenih del kot bistvene sestavine pogodbe. Definicija podjemne pogodbe po OZ teh sestavin in oblike izrecno ne določa, na podlagi česar dopuščam možnost, da bi delno ali v celoti opravljen posel ostal v veljavi tudi, če ne bi bil sklenjen v pisni obliki. Obe ureditvi v bistvenem enako urejata pravice in obveznosti obeh pogodbenih strank, izvajalca in naročnika, na primer glede nadzora nad deli in materiali, odmika od gradbenega načrta, odgovornosti izvajalca za napake gradnje, nujnih nepredvidenih del ter glede določitve cene in njenih sprememb. Razlikujeta se na primer v rokih za grajanje napak in v tem, da Codice civile v večji meri kot OZ predvideva vlogo sodišča (na primer, ko se stranki nista dogovorili ničesar glede nujnih nepredvidenih del).
Keywords:	gradbena pogodba, gradbena pogodba v italijanskem pravu, gradba, podjemna pogodba
Place of publishing:	Maribor
Publisher:	[B. Fakin]
Year of publishing:	2016
PID:	20.500.12556/DKUM-63214
UDC:	347.4/.5:69(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:	5314347
NUK URN:	URN:SI:UM:DK:LPG7SHT0
Publication date in DKUM:	23.09.2016
Views:	1523
Downloads:	175
Metadata:
Categories:	PF
:	Copy citation

Average score:	(0 votes)
Your score:	Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:

Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:	English
Title:	The Construction Contract in Slovenian and Italian Law
Abstract:	This thesis focuses on the main differences between the Slovenian and Italian regulation of the Building Contract concluded among private persons or private undertakings, as regulated in the Slovenian Code of Obligations and Italian Civilian Code. In both regulations the Building Contract is governed in a separate section of each national civil code and is a form of the Contract for Work. Both regulations are alike on all the important aspects and in both regulations, the Building Contract has the character of the obligation of success (result). In each regulation the parties of the contract are the Contractor and the Client, whereas the Contractor undertakes to carry out a certain (construction) work for the Client and the Client is obliged to pay the Contractor specific fee for his work. Italian Civil Code does not define deadline for the completion of the construction work as the essential component of the Building Contract (only price and construction works). According to the said Civil Code the payment must be made at least partially in money and the Building Contract can under certain circumstances be concluded also orally. The Slovenian Code of Obligations sets the written form as the binding form of the Building Contract and construction work, price and deadline as essential components. Slovenian Code of Obligations does not define the same essential components for the Contract for Work, neither does require written form. Based on this I assume that the Building Contract would be valid even if concluded only orally. Both regulations equivalently govern the rights and obligations of both parties, the Contractor and the Client, such as the Client’s right to execute his right to supervise the works and quality control of the materials, deviations from the initial construction plan, the Constructor’s responsibility for defects in a structure, urgent unforeseen works as well as regarding the stipulation of the fee and its changes. The said regulations differ for example in the length of periods during which the Client is obliged to notify the Contractor regarding the defects of the structure. Unlike the Slovenian Code of Obligations, the Italian Civil Code envisages the court as having an important role in replacing the lack of agreement between the parties (for example when parties did not agree on the urgent unforeseen works).
Keywords:	Building Contract, Structure, Contract for Work

Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)

0 - 0 / 0

There are no comments!

Back