| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:Planiranje GNSS izmere z odprtokodnimi programi
Authors:ID Kovačič, Rok (Author)
ID Kovačič, Boštjan (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
ID Uršič, Duško (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf UN_Kovacic_Rok_2016.pdf (4,41 MB)
MD5: 1A703177ABE2D5F6011AFFA4C2EF5694
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Diploma project paper
Organization:FGPA - Faculty of Civil Engineering, Transportation Engineering and Architecture
Abstract:V projekti nalogi sem najprej opisal različne globalne navigacijske satelitske sisteme. Kasneje sem povzel katere metode GNSS izmere vse poznamo, opisal sem tudi slovensko omrežje SIGNAL in pa globalno omrežje IGS. V nadaljevanju sem primerjal dva odprtokodna programa (Trimble GNSS Planning Online in Topcon Occupation Planning) za GNSS planiranje in prikazal kako poteka samo planiranje. Oba programa nam lahko rezultate planiranja podata grafično, točne vrednosti števila satelitov in pa DOP vrednosti pa nam lahko prikaže le program Topcon. V nadaljevanju sem se lotil še vrednostne analize programov, kjer sem v primerjavo vključil še en program, ki pa ni brezplačen in ugotovil, da je ravno ta program najboljši po lastnostih, po relativni vrednosti pa je najbolj optimalna izbira za planiranje GNSS izmere program Topcon. Za tem sem prikazal kako je potekala sama terenska izmera, kjer sem opravil tri meritve z GNSS sprejemnikom znamke Topcon Hiper V, nato podatke obdelal z programom Magnet Office Tools in jih primerjal z rezultati planiranja. Ugotovil sem, da so se DOP vrednosti v programu za planiranje izkazale za malenkost manjše kot pa v rezultatih s terena, kar pa je normalno, saj programi za planiranje predvidijo idealne razmere, ki pa se na terenu pojavijo redkeje. Pri dveh meritvah je prišlo do odstopanj v številu satelitov, s katerimi se je GNSS sprejemnik povezal, DOP faktorji pa so ostali skoraj enaki, kar pa nam pove, da DOP vrednosti niso odvisne samo od števila satelitov, ampak predvsem od razporeditve le teh na nebu.
Keywords:gradbeništvo, geodezija, projektna naloga, planiranje, GNSS
Place of publishing:Maribor
Publisher:[R. Kovačič]
Year of publishing:2016
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-63332 New window
UDC:624(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:21238806 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:KUVTLS6O
Publication date in DKUM:21.09.2016
Views:2081
Downloads:170
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:KTFMB - FG
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:GNSS planning of measurements by open source software
Abstract:In the project work I first described the various global navigation satellite systems. I later summed up all the GNSS surveying methods we know, described the Slovenian network named SIGNAL and the global network named IGS. Afterwards I compared the two open source programs (Trimble GNSS Planning Online and Topcon Occupation Planning) for GNSS planning and showed how the planning is done. Both programs are capable of displaying graphical results, as well as giving us the exact number of satellites. The TOPCON program is the only one capable of giving us the DOP values. Furthermore I tackled the value analysis of the programs, where I have taken into account another program that is not free of use, and I realized that this program was the best in the compared characteristics, whereas for the relative value the most optimal choice for GNSS survey planning would be the program Topcon. After the comparison, I showed how the terrain surveying took place, where I have made three measurements with the Topcon Hiper V GNSS receiver and later processed the data itself with the software Magnet Office Tools and compared them with the results of planning. I concluded that the DOP values in the program for planning were slightly lower than the field results, which is normal, because the planning programs take into account the ideal conditions, which appear less frequently in the field. The two measurements resulted with discrepancies in the number of satellites to which the GNSS receiver was connected, but the DOP factors have remained almost the same, which tells us that the DOP values depend not only on the number of satellites, but primarily on their distribution in the sky.
Keywords:civil engineering, geodesy, project work, planning, GNSS


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica