FIDUCIARNI PRENOS LASTNINSKE PRAVICE NA PREMIČNINAH V ZAVAROVANJE V PRIMERJAVI Z NEPOSESTNO ZASTAVNO PRAVICO

Volf, Marjan

| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

First page > Show document

Show document

Title:	FIDUCIARNI PRENOS LASTNINSKE PRAVICE NA PREMIČNINAH V ZAVAROVANJE V PRIMERJAVI Z NEPOSESTNO ZASTAVNO PRAVICO
Authors:	ID Volf, Marjan (Author) ID Vrenčur, Renato (Mentor) More about this mentor...
Files:	UN_Volf_Marjan_2016.pdf (428,46 KB) MD5: ACF9A73013C92BF630985883FA154CE1
Language:	Slovenian
Work type:	Undergraduate thesis
Typology:	2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:	PF - Faculty of Law
Abstract:	Civilno pravo, je zaradi neustreznosti ročne zastavne pravice, razvilo različne možnosti neposestne zastave, ki se od ročne zastave razlikujejo po neposestnosti prejemnika zavarovanja in možnosti, da dajalec zavarovanja uporablja in izkorišča zastavljeno premičnino še naprej. Fiduciarni prenos lastninske pravice v zavarovanje in neposestna zastavna pravica sta obliki zavarovanja, ki ustrezata tem kriterijem. Oba instituta sta torej neposestna, kar pa je pomanjkljivost glede publicitete in pravnega varstva prejemnika zavarovanja pred dobrovernim pridobiteljem lastninske pravice zastavljene premičnine. Neposestna zastavna pravica je to pomanjkljivost odpravila v sistemu registra neposestnih zastavnih pravic. Ker je zastavljena premičnina v neposredni posesti dajalca zavarovanja (fiducianta, zastavitelja), mora pridobitelj zavarovanja (fiduciar, zastavni upnik) v primeru prodaje pridobiti posest zastavljene stvari, kar pa ni v celoti odvisno od dolžnikovega sodelovanja in njegove pripravljenosti, da omogoči prodajo. Predpisana je namreč obličnost glede sporazuma o ustanovitvi zastavne pravice in sporazuma o prenosu fiduciarne lastnine, ki morata biti sklenjena v obliki neposredno izvršljivega notarskega zapisa in tako predstavljata določeno pomoč upniku, saj imata v primeru izvršbe učinek rubeža. Akcesornost, odvisnost zavarovanja od obveznosti iz temeljnega posla, je lastnost po kateri se oba instituta med seboj razlikujeta. Nobena zastavna pravica namreč ne more nastati, ne da bi obstajala tudi zavarovana terjatev, medtem ko je fiduciarna lastnina neakcesorna zavarovani terjatvi in je obstoj zavarovanja neodvisen od obstoja terjatve. V Stvarnopravnem zakoniku je fiduciarni prenos lastninske pravice vključen prav zaradi njegove neakcesornosti, ki predstavlja določeno alternativo vsem akcesornim oblikam stvarnega zavarovanja.
Keywords:	fiduciarni prenos lastninske pravice v zavarovanje, neposestna zastavna pravica, notarski zapis, posest, akcesornost, publiciteta lastninske pravice
Place of publishing:	Maribor
Publisher:	[M. Volf]
Year of publishing:	2016
PID:	20.500.12556/DKUM-63956
UDC:	347.2(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:	5307947
NUK URN:	URN:SI:UM:DK:FOCDITC2
Publication date in DKUM:	18.11.2016
Views:	7139
Downloads:	220
Metadata:
Categories:	PF
:	Copy citation

Average score:	(0 votes)
Your score:	Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:

Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:	English
Title:	FIDUCIARY TRANSFER OF PROPERTY RIGHTS ON MOVABLE PROPERTY LOMPARED WITH UNPOSSESSORY LIEN
Abstract:	Civil law has due to the inadequacy of pledge, developed various options for inpossessory lien, which differs from the pledge in inpossessority of the security recipient and the possibility that the security giver continues to use and exploit the pledged movable proprety. Fiduciary transfer of property rights in security and inpossessory lien are forms of security, which correspond to these criteria. The two institutions are therefore inpossessory, but this is a deficiency regarding publicity and legal protection of the security recipient against the bona fide acquirer of property rights of the pledged movable property. Inpossessory lien has eliminated this deficiency in the system of registry of inpossessory liens. Since the pledged movable property is in the immediate possession of the security giver (fiduciant, pawner), the security recipient (fiduciar, pawnee) has to obtain in case of sale possession of the pledged things, which is not entirely dependent on the debtor's cooperation and his willingness to allow the sale. Therefore a special form is prescribed regarding the agreement on the establishment of lien and an agreement on the transfer of fiduciary property which must be made in the form of a directly enforceable notarial deed and thus represent a certain assistance to the creditor, as they have in the case of execution the effect of seizure. Accessoriness, dependency of the security from the obligation under the original business, is the characteristic by which the two institutions differ. None of the lien can occur, without there being a secured claim, while the fiduciary property is non accessory to the secured claim and the existence of the security is independent from the existence of the claim. In Property Code, the fiduciary transfer of property right is included just because of its inaccessoriness which represents a certain alternative to all accessory forms of material security.
Keywords:	fiduciary transfer of property rights in security, inpossessory lien, notarial deed, property, accessoriness, publicity of property rights

Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)

0 - 0 / 0

There are no comments!

Back