ZAKAJ ARBITRAŽA NI VEDNO NAJUČINKOVITEJŠE SREDSTVO ZA REŠEVANJE SPOROV

Grom, Boštjan

| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

First page > Show document

Show document

Title:	ZAKAJ ARBITRAŽA NI VEDNO NAJUČINKOVITEJŠE SREDSTVO ZA REŠEVANJE SPOROV
Authors:	ID Grom, Boštjan (Author) ID Keresteš, Tomaž (Mentor) More about this mentor...
Files:	UN_Grom_Bostjan_2016.pdf (855,52 KB) MD5: CE9DD17A80E58041106D2ECDF6A2AB7F
Language:	Slovenian
Work type:	Undergraduate thesis
Typology:	2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:	PF - Faculty of Law
Abstract:	Arbitražno reševanje sporov ima sicer res kar nekaj prednosti pred rednim sodnim postopkom reševanja sporov, a vendar ima tudi pasti, na katere je potrebno posebej opozoriti, saj kljub temu, da je redni sodni postopek počasen in na trenutke neprilagojen novim trendom in času, tudi arbitraža ni vedno boljša izbira sredstva za reševanje medsebojnih sporov. Navedeno velja predvsem, če izpostavimo še neenakost strank, ki se znajdeta v sporu, saj je na arbitražo, kot avtonomno reševanje sporov, z veliko avtonomije strank, mogoče vplivati tako s finančno močjo kot tudi politično močjo predvsem pa z močjo vsiljevanja pogodbenih pogojev.
Keywords:	Arbitražno reševanje sporov ima sicer res kar nekaj prednosti pred rednim sodnim postopkom reševanja sporov, a vendar ima tudi pasti, na katere je potrebno posebej opozoriti, saj kljub temu, da je redni sodni postopek počasen in na trenutke neprilagojen novim trendom in času, tudi arbitraža ni vedno boljša izbira sredstva za reševanje medsebojnih sporov. Navedeno velja predvsem, če izpostavimo še neenakost strank, ki se znajdeta v sporu, saj je na arbitražo, kot avtonomno reševanje sporov, z veliko avtonomije strank, mogoče vplivati tako s finančno močjo kot tudi politično močjo predvsem pa z močjo vsiljevanja pogodbenih pogojev.
Place of publishing:	Maribor
Publisher:	[B. Grom]
Year of publishing:	2016
PID:	20.500.12556/DKUM-64126
UDC:	347.918(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:	5252395
NUK URN:	URN:SI:UM:DK:X6UIKZY7
Publication date in DKUM:	18.11.2016
Views:	1439
Downloads:	197
Metadata:
Categories:	PF
:	Copy citation

Average score:	(0 votes)
Your score:	Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:

Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:	English
Title:	WHY IS ARBITRATION NOT ALWAYS THE MOST EFFICIENT DISPUTE RESOLUTION METHOD
Abstract:	Arbitration does indeed have some advantages over the ordinary judicial dispute settlement procedures, yet it also has pitfalls which must be specially noted, because despite the fact that the ordinary court process is slow and at times adjusted to the new trends and times, including arbitration not always the best choice of the means to resolve conflicts. This applies especially if subjected to inequality customers who find themselves in dispute, with arbitration as an autonomous settlement of disputes, with a lot of autonomy of the parties it can be influenced both by the financial strength and political power in particular, with the power to impose contract terms.
Keywords:	Arbitration does indeed have some advantages over the ordinary judicial dispute settlement procedures, yet it also has pitfalls which must be specially noted, because despite the fact that the ordinary court process is slow and at times adjusted to the new trends and times, including arbitration not always the best choice of the means to resolve conflicts. This applies especially if subjected to inequality customers who find themselves in dispute, with arbitration as an autonomous settlement of disputes, with a lot of autonomy of the parties it can be influenced both by the financial strength and political power in particular, with the power to impose contract terms.

Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)

0 - 0 / 0

There are no comments!

Back