| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:NEPRIŠTEVNOST KOT IZKLJUČITVENI RAZLOG ODGOVORNOSTI ZA PREKRŠEK
Authors:ID Šafarič, Mojmir (Author)
ID Dežman, Zlatan (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf MAG_Safaric_Mojmir_2016.pdf (1,10 MB)
MD5: 8C399620334A97F4230A841DB802BC2D
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Typology:2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:PF - Faculty of Law
Abstract:Magistrska naloga obravnava področje prekrškov v okviru upravnega prava, konkretno v policiji. Razdeljena je na teoretični in na empirični del. V teoretičnem delu so uvodoma opredeljene temeljne zakonske ureditve ter področje obravnavanja prekrškov, predvsem z vidika delovanja policije. Opisan je tudi institut neprištevnosti, ki poleg institutov silobrana, skrajne sile, pravne in dejanske zmote ter prisiljenosti izključuje odgovornost za kazniva dejanja in za prekršek. Nadalje sledi obravnava organov za odločanje v postopkih o prekrških, opis postopkov o prekrških in povezane sankcije ter obravnava področja neprištevnosti. V empiričnem delu naloge je predstavljenih dvajset ilustrativnih primerov situacij, katere obravnavajo policisti na kraju dogodka in policisti z ustrezno izobrazbo za izdajo odločbe o prekršku. Za vsak ilustrativni primer so opisani ustaljeni postopki ravnanja policistov in analiza ter predlog za dosledno zakonito obravnavo, ki odstopa od ustaljene prakse. Podani so tudi argumenti za spremembo ustaljene prakse. V zaključku naloge ugotavljamo, da praksa ne sledi zakonskim zahtevam in navodilom vrhovnega sodišča, pač pa navodilom nadrejenih in učnim pripomočkom. Na podlagi analize ocenjujemo, da bi bilo potrebno prakso spremeniti. Spremembe zahtevajo sledenje zakonskim predpisom in ne navodilom nadrejenih ter učnim pripomočkom. Poleg prej navedenih sprememb pa je potrebno ustrezno usposabljanje policistov in priprava ustreznih učnih gradiv.
Keywords:Postopek o prekršku, upravni postopek, neprištevnost, policija, prekrškovni organ.
Place of publishing:Maribor
Publisher:[M. Šafarič]
Year of publishing:2016
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-64614 New window
UDC:343.91-056.34 (043.3)
COBISS.SI-ID:5324587 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:LDRTEX9A
Publication date in DKUM:08.03.2017
Views:3067
Downloads:294
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:PF
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:INSANITY AS THE REASON FOR EXCLUSION OF LIABILITY FOR MISDEMEANOUR
Abstract:Master's thesis deals with the area of offenses under administrative law, specifically in the police. It is divided into theoretical and empirical part. The theoretical part initially defined the basic regulation and the misdemeanor proceedings, mainly from the perspective of the police work. It also outlines the Institute of insanity, which in addition to the institutions of self-defense, extreme necessity, the legal and factual mistake and compelled excludes liability for criminal offenses and misdemeanors. Furthermore, the following discussion of decision making bodies in the misdemeanor proceedings, the description of the misdemeanors and the associated penalties, and deals with the scope of insanity. In the empirical part of the dissertation presents twenty illustrative examples of situations that police officers treated on the spot and police officers with the proper education to issue a decision on the offense. For each illustrative example describes the established procedures of conduct of police officers and an analysis and a proposal for a consistent legal treatment, which differs from the usual practice. Arguments are given for change of established practices. In conclusion, we find that legal requirements and instructions of the Supreme Court is not followed by practice but by the instructions of superiors and teaching tools. Based on the analysis, we estimate that it would be necessary to change the practice. The changes require following the regulations and not the instructions of superiors and teaching tool. In addition to the aforementioned changes, the need for proper training of police officers and preparation of appropriate teaching materials is necessary.
Keywords:Misdemeanor proceedings, administrative proceedings, sanity, police, misdemeanor authority.


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica