| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:ODGOVORNOST PRAVNIH OSEB ZA KAZNIVA DEJANJA
Authors:ID Tertinek, Nina (Author)
ID Dežman, Zlatan (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf MAG_Tertinek_Nina_2016.pdf (1,01 MB)
MD5: 76B9212F0422648B0D060FDD18BDE1B5
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Typology:2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:PF - Faculty of Law
Abstract:Že rimsko pravo je z znamenitim načelom Societas delinquere non potest preprečevalo deliktno odgovornost pravnih oseb, razvoj prava pa je to načelo obrnil in pod določenimi pogoji uvedel tudi odgovornost pravnih oseb. Odgovornost pravnih oseb za kazniva dejanja določa 42. čl. Kazenskega zakonika (v nadaljevanju KZ-1), še natančneje pa jo opredeli 4. čl. Zakona o odgovornosti pravnih oseb za kazniva dejanja (v nadaljevanju ZOPOKD). V mojem delu analiziram institut odgovornosti pravnih oseb za kazniva dejanja, pri čemer najprej prestavim zgodovinski razvoj te vrste odgovornosti v Sloveniji in mednarodnih pravnih dokumentih. Temu sledili namen ureditve odgovornosti pravnih oseb za kazniva dejanja ter nadaljevanje v osrednji del magistrske naloge, ki obravnava analizo slovenske ureditve kazenske odgovornosti pravnih oseb ter probleme povezane z nejasno umestitvijo tega instituta v slovenski pravni red. Pri utemeljevanju kazenske odgovornosti pravnih oseb namenjam posebno pozornost vprašanju krivde, kot enem najkompleksnejših in najspornejših predpostavk odgovornosti. Osrednji temi sledi poglavje gospodarskih kaznivih dejanja ter sankcioniranje pravnih oseb, nadalje razmejitev kaznivih dejanj in prekrškov ter posebnosti kazenskega postopka za pravne osebe. Pred zaključkom, kjer povzamem sklepne ugotovitve pa za razmislek o nadaljnjih možnostih pravnega urejanja sledi še mednarodna primerjalno-pravna ureditev dveh različnih sistemov, kjer je na eni strani ameriški pravni red, ki kot poglavitni razlog za uzakonitev kazenske odgovornosti pravnih oseb pravni red navaja olajšanje pregona posameznikov, ki storijo kazniva dejanja kot predstavniki/uslužbenci pravne osebe ter nemški pravni red na drugi strani, ki zaradi inkvizitorne narave kazenskega postopka sploh ne potrebuje.
Keywords:pravna oseba, odgovornost pravnih oseb, krivda, kazenska odgovornost
Place of publishing:Maribor
Publisher:[N. Tertinek]
Year of publishing:2016
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-64786 New window
UDC:343.53(043.3)
COBISS.SI-ID:5325099 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:OQ8CYO5D
Publication date in DKUM:08.03.2017
Views:1833
Downloads:240
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:PF
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:CRIMINAL LIABILITY OF LEGAL ENTITY
Abstract:Already Roman law has a famous principle Societas delinquere non potest, which excluded the legal persons from criminal liability. The development of law has changed this principle and under certain conditions the legal persons may be liable for criminal offences. Criminal liability of legal entities is enacted in Article 42 of Slovenian Criminal Code and in Article 4 of Slovenian Liability of Legal Persons for Criminal Offences Act. In my thesis I am analysing the institute of criminal liability of legal persons for criminal offences. I start with historical development in Slovenia and international legal documents. I continue with description of the purpose of enactment of criminal liability for criminal offences and with analysing Slovenian regime of criminal liability. The special attention goes to the question of guilt, which is one of the most complex and disputed assumptions of liability. The central section of thesis follows the section on corporate criminal offences and sanctions against legal persons, the division of administrative sanctions and criminal offences and description of special criminal procedure for legal entities. Before conclusion there is also international comparative legal analysis of two different systems; American, which has enacted criminal liability of legal entities for more effective individual prosecution and German system on the other hand, which due to the nature of inquisitorial criminal proceeding does not need it.
Keywords:legal person, liability of legal entities, guilt, criminal liability


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica