| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:Objektivne meje pravnomočnosti
Authors:ID Hartman, Aleša (Author)
ID Ivanc, Tjaša (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf MAG_Hartman_Alesa_2017.pdf (721,53 KB)
MD5: 1FB14524D231E613388E8AF8DAD4F164
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Typology:2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:PF - Faculty of Law
Abstract:Temeljni cilj vsakega civilnega pravdnega postopka je izdaja pravilne sodne odločbe, s katero se avtoritativno in dokončno uredijo sporna pravna razmerja med strankami tako, da se strankam zagotovi pravno varstvo ogroženih ali kršenih pravic. Posledično se s tem vzpostavi tudi pravni red v družbi. Institut pravnomočnosti omogoča, da postane sodna odločba v določenem trenutku nespremenljiva in zavezujoča. Ker pa pravnomočnost ne velja neomejeno, omejena je namreč z mejami, se pri tem postavljajo vprašanja, kateri deli sodne odločbe postanejo pravnomočni (objektivne meje pravnomočnosti), na koga pravnomočna sodna odločba učinkuje (subjektivne meje pravnomočnosti) in na kateri trenutek se pravnomočnost nanaša (časovne meje pravnomočnosti). V prvem delu magistrskega dela je predstavljen institut pravnomočnosti in njegov pomen za civilni pravdni postopek ter celoten pravni red. Drugi del je namenjen osrednji temi magistrskega dela, predstavitvi instituta objektivnih mej pravnomočnosti. Prikazani so osrednji problemi, s katerimi se pri določanju obsega pravnomočnosti in identitete tožbenega zahtevka srečujeta civilna procesna teorija in praksa. V zadnjem delu magistrskega dela je prikazana primerjalnopravna ureditev instituta objektivnih mej pravnomočnosti, natančneje pravna ureditev v Republiki Hrvaški. Raziskane so podobnosti in morebitne razlike tematike navedenega instituta v obeh pravnih redih. V zaključku magistrskega dela so podani sklepi.
Keywords:pravnomočnost, objektivne meje, obseg pravnomočnosti, identiteta tožbenega zahtevka.
Place of publishing:Maribor
Publisher:[A. Hartman]
Year of publishing:2017
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-65512 New window
UDC:347.919.2(043.3)
COBISS.SI-ID:5414955 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:QTR5QSXB
Publication date in DKUM:29.05.2017
Views:2854
Downloads:465
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:PF
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Objective limits of finality
Abstract:The primary goal of every civil procedure is to issue a correct court ruling, which authoritatively and conclusively regulates disputable legal relations between parties by ensuring the parties receive legal protection of jeopardized and breached rights. As a consequence this also establishes legal order in a society. Institution of finality enables that in a certain moment a court ruling becomes invariable and binding. But since finality does not apply unlimitedly, it is limited by restrictions, questions are raised about which parts of a court ruling become final (objective finality restrictions), who does a court ruling effect (subjective finality restrictions) and to what moment does finality relate to (time finality restrictions). The first part of this master’s thesis represents the institution of finality and its meaning for the civil procedure and the entire legal order. The second part focuses on the main subject of the master’s thesis, namely presentation of the institution of objective finality restrictions. It represents the main problems, which theory and practice of civil procedure encounter in determining the scope of finality and identity of a civil claim. The last part of this master’s thesis represents the comparative legal regulation of the institution of objective finality restrictions, more specifically, legal regulation in the Republic of Croatia. It investigates similarities and potential differences in the subject of the stated institution in both legal orders. The final section of the master’s thesis includes conclusions.
Keywords:finality, objective restrictions, scope of finality, identity of a civil claim.


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica