| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:The contribution to the procedure of capacity determination at unsignalized priority-controlled intersections
Authors:ID Tollazzi, Tomaž (Author)
Files:.pdf PROMET_2004_Tollazzi_The_contribution_to_the_procedure_of_capacity_determination_at_unsignalized_priority-controlled_intersections.pdf (2,55 MB)
MD5: 39982497360BA3E83846403F0A18A57A
 
URL http://www.fpz.unizg.hr/traffic/index.php/PROMTT/article/view/571
 
Language:English
Work type:Scientific work
Typology:1.02 - Review Article
Organization:FGPA - Faculty of Civil Engineering, Transportation Engineering and Architecture
Abstract:The problem of minor vehicles crossing or merging into the major stream at unsignalized priority-controlled intersections is well-known. Numerous solutions involve various assumptions concerning the major headway distributions, number of major lanes, critical gap distributions, etc. Such cases can be divided into two main groups: intersections with two streams (one major and one minor stream) and intersections with more than two streams (more than one major stream and one minor stream). At roundabouts, also at single-lane roundabouts, there are similar problems like the ones at other unsignalized priority-controlled intersections. A vehicle at the roundabout approach can only cross the pedestrian crossing when a sufficient time-gap between two pedestrians (or cyclists) is provided. A vehicle at the roundabout entries can only merge into the major stream when a sufficient gap between the two vehicles in the major stream is provided. Because of that, single-lane round-abouts can also be treated as unsignalized intersections with two major lanes: the first one in its circulatory roadway and the second one on the pedestrian crossing.
Keywords:unsignalized intersection, roundabouts, capacity, two major streams, pedestrians, critical gap
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Year of publishing:2004
Number of pages:str. 31-36
Numbering:Letn. 16, št. 1
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-66062 New window
ISSN:0353-5320
UDC:625.739
ISSN on article:0353-5320
COBISS.SI-ID:8594198 New window
DOI:10.7307/ptt.v16i1.571 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:476DMWQL
Publication date in DKUM:06.06.2017
Views:1660
Downloads:300
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:Misc.
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Promet
Shortened title:Promet
Publisher:Fakultet prometnih znanosti, Fakulteta za pomorstvo in promet, Universita degli studi di Trieste, Istituto per lo studio dei transporti nell'integrazione economica europea, Fakultet za saobračaj i komunikacije, Fakulta prevadzky a ekonomiky dopravy a spojov, Dopravni fakulta Jana Pernera
ISSN:0353-5320
COBISS.SI-ID:1416196 New window

Licences

License:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.
Licensing start date:06.06.2017

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Title:Prispevek k postopku izračuna kapacitete nesemaforiziranih nivojskih križišč, urejenih s prometnim režimom glavne in stranske prometne smeri
Abstract:Problematika križanja ali vključevanja stranskega prometnega toka v nivojskih križiščih, kjer je prometni režim urejen z glavno in stransko prometno smerjo, je znan. Številni pristopi vsebujejo različne predpostavke, ki zadevajo porazdelitev glavnega prometnega toka, število prometnih pasov na glavni prometni smeri, kritično časovno praznino ... Take sisteme lahko razdelimo v dve glavni skupini: križišča z dvema tokoma (enim glavnim in enim stranskim) in križišča z več kot dvema tokoma (več kot dva glavna prometna toka in en stranski prometni tok). V krožnih križiščih, tudi v enopasovnih, obstajajo enaki problemi, kot pri drugih nivojskih križiščih, urejenih s prometnim režimom glavne in stranske prometne smeri. Vozilo na uvozu v krožno križišče se lahko priključi v glavni prometni tok le v primeru, ko je časovni presledek med dvema pešcema (ali kolesarjema) zadosti velika. Vsled tega lahko tudi enopasovna krožna križišča obravnavamo kot nesemaforizirana križišča z dvema glavnima prometnima tokoma: prvim v krožnem vozišču in drugem na prehodu za pešce.
Keywords:nesemaforizirana križišča, krožna križišča, kapaciteta, dva glavna prometna toka, pešci, kritična časovna praznina


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica