| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:Neškodljivo razkritje izuma - milostno obdobje
Authors:ID Dugar, Tamara (Author)
ID Repas, Martina (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf UN_Dugar_Tamara_2017.pdf (933,49 KB)
MD5: 770D5FAF8FABAB47BE653A72D4731A5D
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:PF - Faculty of Law
Abstract:Pričujoče diplomsko delo obravnava vprašanje milostnega obdobja na področju patentov. Avtorica najprej predstavi značilnosti patenta in kriterij novosti izuma, kot najpomembnejši pogoj za pridobitev patenta, nato pa pojem milostnega obdobja, njegove značilnosti in prednosti, ki jih prinaša izumiteljem. Natančneje je analizirana ureditev milostnega obdobja v ZDA, pri čemer je posebna pozornost posvečena zakonu Leahy – Smith America Invents Act, ki je uvedel spremembe tega instituta, in ureditev v Evropi, kjer imamo v zvezi s patentom na voljo institut neškodljivega razkritja izuma, milostno obdobje pa je priznano le na področju modelov. Avtorica ugotavlja, da bi v Evropi bi bilo smiselno uvesti milostno obdobje pred vložitvijo patentne prijave vsaj v obliki t. i. »varnostne mreže«, saj so evropski izumitelji v deprivilegiranem položaju v primerjavi z izumitelji, ki delujejo v sistemih, kjer se lahko zanašajo na obdobje milosti. Uvedba milostnega obdobja je naslednji korak, ki ga narekuje nadaljevanje postopka harmonizacije mednarodnega patentnega prava.
Keywords:milostno obdobje, patent, novost izuma, stanje tehnike, razkritje izuma, neškodljivo razkritje, harmonizacija
Place of publishing:Maribor
Publisher:[T. Dugar]
Year of publishing:2017
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-66480 New window
UDC:347.77.01(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:5434923 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:GGMQLPXX
Publication date in DKUM:16.08.2017
Views:1453
Downloads:140
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:PF
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Non-prejudicial disclosure of the invention - grace period
Abstract:Diploma thesis discusses the question of grace period for patents. The author starts by presenting the characteristics of patents and requirement of novelty as the single most important condition for obtaining a patent. The author further presents the concept of grace period, its characteristics and benefits it has for inventors, which is followed by a close analysis of grace period in the USA, with special attention being paid to Leahy – Smith America invents act, which introduced changes to grace period. Lastly, the author presents the concept of non-prejudicial disclosure of the invention and grace period for models that we have in Europe. The author establishes that grace period should be introduced in Europe at least in the form of »safety net« grace period, since current regulation puts European inventors in a deprivileged position as opposed to inventors that work in the systems where they can rely on grace period. Introducing grace period in Europe is the next step that is required under the process of harmonisation of international patent law.
Keywords:grace period, patent, novelty of invention, state of the art, disclosure of invention, non-prejudicial disclosure, harmonization


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica