Pomen dobre vere pri protiknjižnem priposestvovanju v Sloveniji ob primerjavi z ureditvijo v Avstriji, Nemčiji in Švici

Šömen, Jan

| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

First page > Show document

Show document

Title:	Pomen dobre vere pri protiknjižnem priposestvovanju v Sloveniji ob primerjavi z ureditvijo v Avstriji, Nemčiji in Švici
Authors:	ID Šömen, Jan (Author) ID Vrenčur, Renato (Mentor) More about this mentor...
Files:	MAG_Somen_Jan_2017.pdf (653,24 KB) MD5: 64ACD3D7C42CFF34162EB753E75DDD39 PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/005645bd-2b67-4cb2-aace-8819969f3aae
Language:	Slovenian
Work type:	Master's thesis/paper
Typology:	2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:	PF - Faculty of Law
Abstract:	V stvarnem pravu, ki prvenstveno ureja razmerja med subjekti glede objektov, sem zasledil nedorečenost, ki jo želim raziskati podrobneje. Pridobitvi lastninske pravice na podlagi zakona, ki jo omogoča Stvarnopravni zakonik (SPZ) pravimo priposestvovanje. Za to, da na tak način nekdo pridobi lastninsko pravico, pa morajo biti izpolnjeni še nekateri nadaljnji pogoji, ki so potek priposestvovalne dobe, lastniška posest, ki jo sestavlja zavest priposestvovalca, da objekt poseduje kot lastnik ter dobra vera, ki pomeni da posestnik ne ve in ne more vedeti, da ni lastnik. Pri presoji ali je izpolnjen pogoj dobre vere za izvirni način pridobitve ene od naštetih pravic, se namreč pojavlja veliko različnih interpretacij tako s strani sodne prakse kot s strani pravne teorije. Sodna praksa se odloča za povsem drug pristop za presojo ali je pogoj dobre vere izpolnjen. Ne zahteva namreč, da je za pogoj dobre vere priposestvovalec tudi vpisan v zemljiško knjigo. Pravna teorija po drugi strani zastopa stališče, po katerem priposestvovalec ne more biti v dobri veri, če je iz javne zemljiške knjige razvidno, da ni vpisan kot lastnik. Ker mora poznati zakone na območju pravnega reda na katerem deluje mora tudi vedeti, da je pri pravnoposlovnih pridobitvah stvarnih pravic, ki se vpisujejo v zemljiško knjigo, konstitutivnega pomena za nastanek, prenos, obremenitev pravice ravno vpis v zemljiško knjigo. Ker mu to pravilo pa načelu ignorantia iuris nocet mora biti znano in ker je zemljiška knjiga javna knjiga, na vpogled vsakomur, se priposestvovalec mora zavedati da zaradi odsotnosti vpisa v zemljiško knjigo ne more biti lastnik. Zaradi tega tudi ne more biti dobroverni lastniški posestnik, iz česar izhaja tudi temeljna hipoteza moje naloge, ki jo bom skozi temeljito obravnavo bodisi potrdil ali zavrnil, obenem pa ponudil vpogled v rešitve teh vprašanj tudi v pravnih sistemih Nemčije, Avstrije in Švice.
Keywords:	stvarno pravo, lastninska pravica, služnostna pravica, pravnoposlovni prenos, priposestvovanje, odločba državnega organa, zemljiška knjiga, konstutivnost vpisa, načelo publicitete, primerjalnopravna ureditev, ZvetL, Nemčija, Avstrija, Švica, dobra vera, posest, publiciteta.
Place of publishing:	Maribor
Publisher:	[J. Šömen]
Year of publishing:	2017
PID:	20.500.12556/DKUM-66852
UDC:	349.4(043.3)
COBISS.SI-ID:	5431595
NUK URN:	URN:SI:UM:DK:TEEES8YS
Publication date in DKUM:	08.08.2017
Views:	1953
Downloads:	928
Metadata:
Categories:	PF
:	Copy citation

Average score:	(0 votes)
Your score:	Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:

Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Licences

License:	CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

Link:	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Description:	The most restrictive Creative Commons license. This only allows people to download and share the work for no commercial gain and for no other purposes.
Licensing start date:	13.07.2017

Secondary language

Language:	English
Title:	The meaning of good faith in acquiring ownership of immovables through prescription with comparison to the legislations of Austria, Germany and Switzerland
Abstract:	Property law regulates relationships between different subjects, regarding objects. The main theme of my masters seminar is an institute in the area of civil law, with a funciton of uniting the legal portrait and the actual state of rights concerning real estate. It is a special way of aquiring ownership of immovable things, called prescription. In order for a person to aquire ownership by prescription, one has to be a possesor of the property, being in good faith he already is an owner. The good faith in Slovenian law means, that the possesor doesn't know and cannot know, he is not the actual owner of the immovable thing in his possesion. Slovenan courts and legal theorethics have very different approaches and criteria on deciding whether this condition is met in different cases. The courts have decided in many cases in so far, that the condition of good faith was fulfilled, even though the possesor wasn't enlisted as the owner in the land register. The part of the theory on the other hand, represents another standpoint, being, that the possesor cannot be in good faith, if the before mentioned condition isn't met (the enlistment as the owner in the land register). Because it is everyones right and duty to know the legislation which applies on the area of the state (ignorantia iuris nocet), it is automatically his obligation to know the conditions, required to obtain ownership of an immovable thing (plot of land, real estate, appartment, etc.) weren't fulfilled. Our legislation states, that the buyer of an immovable thing becomes an owner, when he registers as the owner in the land registry. Therefore it is everyones obligation to be aware of that fact. How can then somebody be in good faith, that he is the owner, when one knows, that the fundamental condition to aquire ownership wasn't met? The main hypothesis of my work is, that therefore the conditions for prescriptions are hardly evere fulfilled, which is why the possibility of aqusition of ownership in this way is very limited. Through my work I will try to confirm or deny this thesis and ultimately compare our system with the solutions of legal frameworks of Germany, Austria and Switzerland.
Keywords:	ownership, limited rights, real estate, servitudes, business agreement, land registry, international comparison, good faith, aquisition, Austria, Switzerland, Germany, possesion, public faith, publicity.

Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)

0 - 0 / 0

There are no comments!

Back