| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:Vpliv odločbe SEU v zadevi Pula Parking na razlago Bruseljske uredbe Ia
Authors:ID Kržan, Patricija (Author)
ID Repas, Martina (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf UN_Krzan_Patricija_2017.pdf (865,54 KB)
MD5: 8694177B7D3A735267DED8D3CC99FFDA
PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/5d954057-4659-49ab-ab54-99122d47cc9e
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:PF - Faculty of Law
Abstract:Diplomsko delo se nanaša na posamezna pravila Uredbe št. 1215/2012 o pristojnosti in priznavanju ter izvrševanju sodnih odločb v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah, ki so pomembna za razumevanje sodne odločbe v zadevi Pula Parking. Sodišče Evropske unije je v tej zadevi povzelo najpomembnejša pravila razlage pojma »civilna in gospodarska zadeva« ter se prvič ukvarjalo s pojmom »sodišče«, v zvezi s katerim je postavilo pomembne smernice pri odločanju ali se organ šteje za »sodišče« v smislu Uredbe št. 1215/2012. Eno izmed pomembnejših načel razlage Uredbe št. 1215/2012 je načelo avtonomnosti, kar pomeni, da so za opredelitev pojmov odločilna splošna pravna načela in cilji, ki jih je mogoče izpeljati iz pravil prava EU, hkrati pa je potrebno te pojme razlagati s sklicevanjem na cilje in ureditev uredbe. V skladu s tem je Sodišče Evropske unije v zadevi Pula Parking odločilo, da je potrebno za ugotovitev ali gre za civilno in gospodarsko zadevo, preučiti pravno razmerje med strankama spora ter podlago in pravila za uveljavljanje vloženega pravnega sredstva. Glede pojma »sodišče« je Sodišče Evropske unije odločilo, da se v skladu s ciljem uredbe, ki je olajševanje dostopa do sodnega varstva, za sodišče v smislu uredbe štejejo organi, ki so v nacionalnih predpisih držav članic opredeljeni kot sodišče in pa organa, ki jih uredba natančno določa.
Keywords:Bruseljska uredba Ia, civilna in gospodarska zadeva, sodišče, avtonomna razlaga, zadeva Pula Parking
Place of publishing:Maribor
Publisher:[P. Kržan]
Year of publishing:2017
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-67364 New window
UDC:341.24(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:5435947 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:GBVPQYEO
Publication date in DKUM:23.08.2017
Views:1698
Downloads:211
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:PF
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Licences

License:CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Description:The most restrictive Creative Commons license. This only allows people to download and share the work for no commercial gain and for no other purposes.
Licensing start date:14.08.2017

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Impact of CJEU's decision in Pula Parking case on interpretation of Brussels Ia Regulation
Abstract:My thesis deals with individual rules of the Regulation no. 1215/2012 of the European parliament and the council on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgements in civil and commercial matters. These rules are decisive for understanding the decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the case Pula Parking. In this case the Court of Justice of the European Union summarized the most important rules concerning interpretation of “civil and commercial matters” and for the first time dealt with meaning of the “court”. The Court of Justice of the European Union provided important guidance in deciding whether the body is considered a court within the meaning of the Regulation no. 1215/2012. One of the most important principles of interpretation of Regulation no. 1215/2012 is the necessity of autonomous interpretation, which means that the concepts used in Regulation no. 1215/2012 must be interpreted by reference, first, to the general principles and objectives of European law and, second, to the objectives and scheme of the Regulation no. 1215/2012. Accordingly, in the case Pula Parking the Court of Justice of the European Union decided that it is necessary to identify the legal relationship between the parties to the dispute and to examine the basis and the rules governing the bringing of the action to determine whether the matter is civil and commercial. The Court of Justice of the European Union decided that one of the main objectives of Regulation is facilitating access to justice. In accordance with this objective, bodies which are defined as courts by national rules and bodies that are determined as courts by the regulation, are considered as courts within the meaning of the Regulation no. 1215/2012.
Keywords:Brussels Ia Regulation, civil and commercial matter, court, autonomous interpretation, case Pula Parking


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica