| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:Pravica biti pozabljen v digitalni dobi
Authors:ID Bobek, Vesna (Author)
ID Ferčič, Aleš (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf UN_Bobek_Vesna_2017.pdf (996,89 KB)
MD5: B500DB4FA338D6B983758B887F987523
PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/7f03c7dc-1be4-4c4b-9dc8-d798705a42f9
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:PF - Faculty of Law
Abstract:Diplomsko delo obravnava pravico biti pozabljen v dobi, ki je zelo povezana z uporabo spleta. Ta pravica postaja vse pomembnejša in s tem vse kar je z njo povezano. Predpisi na tem področju so dokaj zastareli in ne zagotavljajo vsega potrebnega, da bi bile pravice posameznikov ustrezno varovane. Praksa je pokazala, da je varstvo osebnih podatkov treba prenoviti in pri tem biti pozoren na to, da interpretacija ter avtentična razlaga čim podrobneje pojasnita, kaj pravica sploh pomeni in kakšno ter čigavo ravnanje je potrebno. Dejstvo je, da pravica biti pozabljen ni nova pravica in da ima svoje začetke že v prvih predpisih Evropske unije, ki varujejo zasebnost posameznikov ter v poznejših aktih še osebne podatke. Pravica biti pozabljen izvira iz pravice do izbrisa, ki pa jo države članice v svojih nacionalnih predpisih zaradi direktive urejajo vsaka zase, kar vodi do različnih interpretacij. Temu se sedaj obeta preobrat, saj je sprejet nov predpis, ki bo reformiral in nadomestil prejšnjega. Skozi študij posameznih določb aktov, strokovnih mnenj in sodb je razvidno, da so pogledi na ureditev ter argumentacijo za in proti pravici različni. V prihodnosti je zaradi aktualnosti in nejasnih določb na tem področju pričakovati več navodil ter razlag.
Keywords:pravica biti pozabljen, varstvo osebnih podatkov, pravica do izbrisa, splet, Sodišče Evropske unije, 17. člen Uredbe 2016/679
Place of publishing:Maribor
Publisher:[V. Bobek]
Year of publishing:2017
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-67503 New window
UDC:342.7:004.738.5(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:5445163 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:D5LXIXP8
Publication date in DKUM:12.09.2017
Views:1857
Downloads:192
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:PF
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Licences

License:CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Description:The most restrictive Creative Commons license. This only allows people to download and share the work for no commercial gain and for no other purposes.
Licensing start date:21.08.2017

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:The right to be forgotten in digital era
Abstract:The thesis deals with the right to be forgotten in the era in which everyone is more and more dependent on the internet. The right is becoming increasingly important, as well as the consideration of those who are obligated to provide it. Rules in this area are quite outdated and therefore they do not ensure everything in order to properly protect individuals' rights. Experience has shown that it is necessary to reform protection of personal data. While doing so, the authentic interpretation must be as precise and exact as possible, to clarify all the issues accured in practise. The fact is, that the right to be forgotten is not a new right. It has its roots in the foundamental European Union legislation, that protect privacy of individuals and personal data, which emerged later. The right to be forgotten derives from the right to erasure, which is regulated by the member states in their national legislation. This causes various interpretations and uncertainties about it. With the adoption of a new regulation, the meaning of the right will be more consistent due to replacement and reformation of the previous legislation. Via studies of clauses, expert opinions and a rulling, it is evident, that the views over the regulation and arguments for and against the right are different. Because of the importance and ambiguity of the matter, more guidance and explanations are expected.
Keywords:right to be forgotten, data protection, right to erasure, Internet, Court of Justice of the European Union, article 17 of the Regulation (EU) 2016/679


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica