Pomen ugotovitvene tožbe in ugotovitvene sodbe v pravdnem postopku

Ocvirk, Špela

| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

First page > Show document

Show document

Title:	Pomen ugotovitvene tožbe in ugotovitvene sodbe v pravdnem postopku
Authors:	ID Ocvirk, Špela (Author) ID Ivanc, Tjaša (Mentor) More about this mentor...
Files:	UN_Ocvirk_Spela_2017.pdf (709,55 KB) MD5: 69386516C93E8998BD031A0815723755 PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/557fbda9-ca5d-41dc-9e93-a4d52ae88962
Language:	Slovenian
Work type:	Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:	2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:	PF - Faculty of Law
Abstract:	Pravdni postopek se začne s tožbo, sodišče ga ne more začeti po uradni dolžnosti, ampak le na pobudo stranke. Glede na vsebino tožbenih zahtevkov poznamo dajatvene (kondemnatorne), ugotovitvene (deklaratorne) ter oblikovalne (konstitutivne) tožbe. Z ugotovitveno tožbo tožnik zahteva ugotovitev obstoja ali neobstoja določenega pravnega razmerja ali pravice. Je edina oblika tožbe, ki jo Zakon o pravdnem postopku, zaradi posebnih procesnih predpostavk, ki morajo biti izpolnjene, izrecno ureja. Edino dejstvo, ki ga je z ugotovitveno tožbo mogoče ugotavljati, je pristnost ali nepristnost listine. Za ugotovitveno tožbo so potrebne tri procesne predpostavke, kot tretja je pravni interes, ki se pri dajatveni in oblikovalni tožbi domnevata, pri ugotovitveni pa ga je potrebno posebej dokazovati, razen če lahko tožnik vloži tožbo na podlagi posebnega predpisa oziroma, če se z ugotovitveno tožbo zahteva ugotovitev (ne)pristnosti listine. S sodbo sodišče avtoritativno odloči o utemeljenosti zahtevka, ki se tiče glavne stvari in stranskih terjatev. Sodbe se glede vsebine pravnega varstva delijo na dajatvene, ugotovitvene in oblikovalne. Z ugotovitveno sodbo sodišče izreče, ali obstoji oz. ne obstoji določena pravica ali pravno razmerje. Le izjemoma je mogoče z ugotovitveno sodbo odločiti o obstoju spornih dejstev. Zakon o pravdnem postopku dovoljuje le ugotavljanje pristnosti ali nepristnosti listine. Ugotovitveni sodbi ne sledi izvršilni postopek zaradi prisilne izvršbe te sodbe, saj ugotovitvena sodba s pravnomočnostjo odstrani dvom o obstoju ali neobstoju določene pravice ali pravnega razmerja. Sicer pa veljajo za ugotovitveno sodbo enaka pravila kot za ugotovitveno tožbo.
Keywords:	Ugotovitvena tožba, ugotovitev (ne)obstoja pravnega razmerja ali pravice, pravni interes, ugotovitev (ne)pristnosti listine, ugotovitvena sodba.
Place of publishing:	Maribor
Publisher:	[Š. Ocvirk]
Year of publishing:	2017
PID:	20.500.12556/DKUM-67924
UDC:	347.922.6(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:	5449259
NUK URN:	URN:SI:UM:DK:8YOVVC8R
Publication date in DKUM:	20.09.2017
Views:	2820
Downloads:	675
Metadata:
Categories:	PF
:	Copy citation

Average score:	(0 votes)
Your score:	Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:

Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Licences

License:	CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

Link:	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Description:	The most restrictive Creative Commons license. This only allows people to download and share the work for no commercial gain and for no other purposes.
Licensing start date:	04.09.2017

Secondary language

Language:	English
Title:	The importance of declaratory action and declaratory judgment in the civil procedure
Abstract:	The civil process begins with an action, the court can not start ex officio, but only on the initiative of the client. Depending on the content of claims, there are duty, declaratory and formative actions. With a declaratory action the plaintiff requires a finding of the existence or absence of a specific legal relationship or right. It is the only form of legal action explicitly regulated by the Civil Procedure Act, because of the specific procedural assumptions which must be met. The only fact that can be determined by the declaratory action is the authenticity or unauthenticity of the document. Three procedural assumptions are necessary for the declaratory action. Of those three, the third procedural assumption is a legal interest which is presumed in the duty and formative action, but in the declaratory action it needs to be specifically proven, unless the plaintiff can bring an action on the basis of a special regulation or, if the action requires the finding of the (un)authenticity of the document. By a judgment, the court will authoritatively decide on the merits of the claim concerning the main thing and the side claims. The judgments on the subject of legal protection are divided into duty, declaratory and formative. By a declaratory judgment, the court pronounces whether a certain right or legal relationship exists or does not exist. Only in exceptional cases is it possible to decide on the existence of the disputed facts with the declaratory judgment. Civil Procedure Act only allows for the authenticity or unauthenticity of the document. A declaratory judgment is not followed by the enforcement procedure due to the enforced execution of this judgment, since the declaratory judgment with the res judicata removes the doubt about the existence or absence of a certain right or legal relationship. Otherwise, same rules apply to the declaratory judgment as to the declaratory action.
Keywords:	A declaratory action, finding (non) existence of a legal relationship or right, legal interest, finding (un)authenticity of the document, a declaratory judgment.

Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)

0 - 0 / 0

There are no comments!

Back