| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:Hišna preiskava pri odvetniku
Authors:ID Aleš, Laura (Author)
ID Dežman, Zlatan (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf UN_Ales_Laura_2017.pdf (552,49 KB)
MD5: 04262C36B13E68489F6E59027B8C78EF
PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/317e47a3-56c1-4107-a4dc-79c21974560f
 
.zip UN_Ales_Laura_2017.zip (8,25 MB)
MD5: 13B156D694FECF812C7783FA725DD92A
PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/52b819e8-8678-48c4-abd6-e061b6eea694
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:PF - Faculty of Law
Abstract:V diplomskem delu sem predstavila enega izmed sodobnih problemov, ki se pojavljajo v sodni praksi – hišna preiskava odvetniške pisarne. Ker je tema zelo obsežna, sem se v svojem diplomskem delu osredotočila le na določene najpomembnejše točke. Ugotovila sem, da sta ustavna in kazensko pravna tematika močno prepleteni. Najprej sem si postavila vprašanje, kaj sploh je zasebnost? Jo je mogoče definirati? Iz literature sem ugotovila, da je zasebnost nekaj subjektivnega, zato je nemogoče podati univerzalno definicijo zasebnosti. V predkazenskem postopku se pogosto izvajajo preiskovalna dejanja, pri katerih pride do izrazitih posegov v posameznikovo zasebnost. Hišna preiskava je ena izmed preiskovalnih dejanj, ki se najpogosteje izvede v predkazenskem postopku in močno poseže v človekove pravice in temeljne svoboščine posameznika. Odvetniška pisarna je poseben prostor, saj pride v njej do prepleta zasebnosti odvetnika in tudi odvetnikovih strank. Vendar odvetniška pisarna ni nedotakljiv prostor, znotraj katerega bi se lahko odvijala kazniva dejanja. Ustavno sodišče je v odločbi U-I 115/14-28, Up-218/14-45, dne 21.1.2016 prvič opredelilo pojem odvetniške zasebnosti. Z omenjeno odločbo je odločilo, da sta Zakon o kazenskem postopku in Zakon o odvetništvu v nasprotju z Ustavo, kar se tiče hišne preiskave odvetniške pisarne. Do odprave protiustavnosti in do sprejetja novele ZKP-N je v 60. do 63. točki obrazložitve določilo izvajanje hišne preiskave pri odvetnikih.
Keywords:Človekove pravice in temeljne svoboščine, zasebnost, pravica do zasebnosti, test legitimnosti, test sorazmernosti, predkazenski postopek, dokazni standardi, neodvisnost odvetništva, hišna preiskava odvetniške pisarne, predlog novele ZKP-N
Place of publishing:Maribor
Publisher:[L. Aleš]
Year of publishing:2017
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-68122 New window
UDC:343.13(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:5474603 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:DQGDDG2J
Publication date in DKUM:30.10.2017
Views:2191
Downloads:409
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:PF
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Licences

License:CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Description:The most restrictive Creative Commons license. This only allows people to download and share the work for no commercial gain and for no other purposes.
Licensing start date:10.09.2017

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:SEARCH OF A LAWYER'S OFFICE
Abstract:This graduation thesis presents one of the contemporary problems in court practice – search of a lawyer’s office. As this topic is very extensive, the graduation thesis focuses on certain issues that are considered the most relevant. I have established that the domains of constitutional and criminal law are strongly intertwined. First I asked myself: What is privacy in its essence? Can it be defined? I found in the literature that privacy is a subjective concept, and it is therefore impossible to provide a universal definition of privacy. The pre-trial procedure often includes investigative actions that constitute a serious invasion of a person’s privacy. House search is among investigative actions that are most often implemented in the pre-trial procedure and seriously interfere with human rights and fundamental freedoms of an individual. A lawyer’s office is a specific place where lawyer’s privacy intertwines with privacy of their clients. However, a lawyer’s office is not an inviolable space where criminal offences can freely be committed. In its Decision U-I 115/14-28, Up-218/14-45 of 21 January 2016, the Constitutional Court defined for the first time the notion of lawyer’s privacy. It decided that the Criminal Procedure Act and the Attorneys Act were in conflict with the Constitution with regard to search of a lawyer’s office. Until this unconstitutionality is abolished and the amended Criminal Procedure Act (ZKP-N) adopted, the procedure of search of a lawyer’s office is defined in items 60 to 63 of the grounds for the decision.
Keywords:Human rights and fundamental freedoms, privacy, right to privacy, test of legitimacy, test of proportionality, pre-trial procedure, standards of proof, independence of attorneys, search of a lawyer’s office, draft amendments to the Criminal Procedure Act (ZKP-N)


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica