Okoljska škoda in Rimska uredba II

Urbančič, Laura

| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

First page > Show document

Show document

Title:	Okoljska škoda in Rimska uredba II
Authors:	ID Urbančič, Laura (Author) ID Repas, Martina (Mentor) More about this mentor...
Files:	UN_Urbancic_Laura_2017.pdf (686,28 KB) MD5: 0E60D6DEB8E1309FC7D8C02B57F42C50 PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/8e7da399-b256-4cc3-90f3-cedb1c6c6643
Language:	Slovenian
Work type:	Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:	2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:	PF - Faculty of Law
Abstract:	Cilj diplomske naloge je razdelati člen 7 Rimske uredbe II na posamezne problemske sklope znotraj te določbe ter vsak sklop preučiti. S tem se doseže jasna razmejitev uporabe člena 7 Rimske uredbe II od drugih relevantnih členov, pod katere lahko subsumiramo konkretno dejansko stanje, da ugotovimo, katere okoliščine so tiste, ki v takšnih primerih določajo uporabo ustrezne določbe. Pogosto prihaja do dilem ravno pri členu 7 Rimske uredbe II in členu 5 Rimske uredbe II o odgovornosti za proizvode, saj je veliko primerov, ko okoljska škoda nastane ravno zaradi napake izdelka. Z analizo koncepta okoljske škode znotraj določbe člena 7 Rimske uredbe II se doseže boljše razumevanje same določbe, ker se omeji domet situacij, ki spadajo pod okoljsko škodo. S pomočjo sodnih odločb Sodišča EU s področja mednarodne pristojnosti v Bruseljski uredb I, ki se uporabljajo tudi pri razlagi pojmov iz Rimske uredbe II, ugotovimo, da posredna škoda ni pomembna pri določanju kraja, kjer je škoda nastala in skladno s tem pravo države, kjer je škoda nastala. Skladno s tem posredne škode iz člena 7 Rimske uredbe II ne smemo preširoko razlagati, saj bi to vodilo v absurdnost.
Keywords:	okoljska škoda, Rimska uredba II, nepogodbena obveznost, lex specialis, škodni dogodek, posredna škoda.
Place of publishing:	Maribor
Publisher:	[L. Urbančič]
Year of publishing:	2017
PID:	20.500.12556/DKUM-68361
UDC:	341.2(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:	5471275
NUK URN:	URN:SI:UM:DK:GRCF0DE4
Publication date in DKUM:	27.10.2017
Views:	1403
Downloads:	171
Metadata:
Categories:	PF
:	Copy citation

Average score:	(0 votes)
Your score:	Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:

Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Licences

License:	CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

Link:	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Description:	The most restrictive Creative Commons license. This only allows people to download and share the work for no commercial gain and for no other purposes.
Licensing start date:	18.09.2017

Secondary language

Language:	English
Title:	Environmental damage and Rome II Regulation
Abstract:	The aim of this bachelor thesis is to study Article 7 of the Rome II Regulation concerning its problematic parts and to further analyse each of those parts. With that, we can establish a clear division of application of Article 7 of the Rome II Regulation from other articles and determine the actual state in order to find out, which conditions are those that require the application of an adequate provision. Many questions have been raised regarding Article 7 and Article 5 from the Rome II Regulation about the product liability because there are many cases where the damage is caused due to product defects. Analysis of the concept of environmental damage pursuant to Article 7 of the Rome II Regulation gains us a better understanding of the provision as it limits the scope of situations that are considered as environmental damage. The judicial decisions of the European Court of Justice in the field of international jurisdiction of the Brussels I Regulation, that is also used for interpretation of terms, helped us establish that indirect damage alone is not important in determining the place where the damage occurred and in accordance to that also the law of the county where the damage occurred. Therefore, the indirect damage as described in Article 7 of the Rome II Regulation should not be interpreted too broadly, as it would lead into an absurdity.
Keywords:	environmental damage, Rome II Regulation, non-contractual obligation, lex specialis, harmful event, indirect damage.

Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)

0 - 0 / 0

There are no comments!

Back