Diferenciacija pri poučevanju naravoslovja v prvem in drugem vzgojno-izobraževalnem obdobju osnovne šole

Skribe-Dimec, Darja

| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

First page > Show document

Show document

Title:	Diferenciacija pri poučevanju naravoslovja v prvem in drugem vzgojno-izobraževalnem obdobju osnovne šole
Authors:	ID Skribe-Dimec, Darja (Author)
Files:	Revija_za_elementarno_izobrazevanje_2013_Skribe-Dimec_Diferenciacija_pri_poucevanju_naravoslovja_v_prvem_in_drugem_vzgojno-izobrazevalne.pdf (711,60 KB) MD5: 0A9E48850320025E45E88FEC9857FD4C PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/3dd6b15d-5ed3-44f2-9d60-377d12cc14a8 http://rei.pef.um.si/images/Izdaje_revije/2013/2-3/REI_6_st_2-3_cl_11.pdf
Language:	Slovenian
Work type:	Scientific work
Typology:	1.02 - Review Article
Organization:	PEF - Faculty of Education
Abstract:	Vsi se zavedamo, da so med učenci razlike v njihovem znanju in tudi v sposobnostih oziroma spretnostih in stališčih. Zanimalo nas je, ali se te razlike upoštevajo pri načrtovanju in izvajanju pouka začetnega naravoslovja. Dokaze za diferenciacijo smo iskali v učnih načrtih za pouk naravoslovja na razredni stopnji, v učbenikih za pouk naravoslovja na razredni stopnji ter v pojmovanjih in ravnanjih študentov, bodočih učiteljev razrednega pouka. Ugotavljamo, da se razlik med učenci jasno zavedajo slovenski načrtovalci pouka, saj so v učnih načrtih posebej opredelili »minimalne« in »temeljne standarde znanja«. S pomočjo anketnega vprašalnika smo ugotovili, da se tudi večina študentov zaveda razlik v znanju učencev. Analiza učnih priprav, ki so jih napisali študenti, pa je pokazala velike pomanjkljivosti pri udejanjanju diferenciacije pri pouku naravoslovja. Praviloma več kot 90 % priprav, ki jih študenti napišejo na začetku izobraževanja pri didaktiki naravoslovja, ne vključuje niti kvantitativne niti kvalitativne diferenciacije. Ugotovili smo, da se ob koncu izobraževanja pojmovanje diferenciacije udejanja v elementih konstruktivistične teorije učenja. Z analizo različnih učbenikov in delovnih zvezkov smo ugotavljali, kako o diferenciaciji razmišljajo avtorji učbenikov. Izkazalo se je, da večina učnih gradiv ne vključuje elementov diferenciacije.
Keywords:	diferenciacija, naravoslovje, učna priprava, konstruktivistični način poučevanja, učbenik, učna diferenciacija, poučevanje, učni načrti, učitelji, osnovne šole
Publication status:	Published
Publication version:	Version of Record
Year of publishing:	2013
Number of pages:	str. 193-211
Numbering:	Letn. 6, št. 2/3
PID:	20.500.12556/DKUM-68415
ISSN:	1855-4431
UDC:	37.091.2:5
ISSN on article:	1855-4431
COBISS.SI-ID:	9788489
NUK URN:	URN:SI:UM:DK:JS7TIJYH
Publication date in DKUM:	21.09.2017
Views:	2022
Downloads:	318
Metadata:
Categories:	Misc.
:	Copy citation

Average score:	(0 votes)
Your score:	Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:

Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Record is a part of a journal

Title:	Revija za elementarno izobraževanje
Publisher:	Založba PEF, Pedagoška fakulteta, Založba PEF, Pedagoška fakulteta, Založba PEF, Pedagoška fakultete Univerze, Univerza na Primorskem, Pedagoška fakulteta, Univerzitetna založba Univerze v Mariboru
ISSN:	1855-4431
COBISS.SI-ID:	239555072

Licences

License:	CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

Link:	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Description:	The most restrictive Creative Commons license. This only allows people to download and share the work for no commercial gain and for no other purposes.
Licensing start date:	21.09.2017

Secondary language

Language:	English
Title:	Differentation in teaching science in the first and second cycles of primary education
Abstract:	There are differences between pupils with regard to their knowledge, but also their abilities or skills and attitudes. The aim of our research study was to determine whether those differences are taken into account while planning and executing primary science lessons. We looked for evidence of differentiation in primary science curricula and textbooks as well as in conceptions and practices of students who are to be future primary school teachers. We noticed that Slovenian curricula designers were clearly aware of the differentiation, as the curricula specifically defined “minimum” and “basic” standards of knowledge. Based on a questionnaire we established that most students were well aware of the differences in pupils’ level of knowledge. An analysis of the lesson plans that were written by students showed significant shortcomings in differentiation in primary science education. As a rule, over 90 per cent of lesson plans that students had to write at the beginning of natural science didactics did not include either quantitative or qualitative differentiation. We found out that once students had completed the teacher education programme, the concept of differentiation was realized through the elements of the constructivist theory of learning. By analyzing various textbooks and workbooks, we tried to determine how the authors of the respective books perceived differentiation. We came to a conclusion that a majority of teaching materials did not incorporate the elements of differentiation.
Keywords:	differentiation, science, lesson plans, constructivist way of teaching, textbook, learning differentiation, teaching, curricula, teachers, primary schools

Collection

This document is a part of these collections:

Revija za elementarno izobraževanje

Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)

0 - 0 / 0

There are no comments!

Back