| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:Posestno varstvo v zvezi z izvrševanjem služnosti s pregledom sodne prakse
Authors:ID Fekonja, Klemen (Author)
ID Vrenčur, Renato (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf UN_Fekonja_Klemen_2017.pdf (511,08 KB)
MD5: FFC631751542C6E2CE88DE8EEAF1A98F
PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/1892507e-3074-4ae5-b354-2162cb582e4a
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:PF - Faculty of Law
Abstract:Posestno varstvo predstavlja varovanje dejanske oblasti nad stvarjo, ne glede na način, s katerim je bila ta pridobljena. Kot temeljno obliko posestnega varstva poznamo sodno varstvo, ter samopomoč kot subsidiarno obliko posestnega varstva. Ko sodišče daje sodno varstvo mora upoštevati zadnje stanje posesti in nastalo motenje, samopomoč pa se načeloma lahko uporabi samo izjemoma pod zakonsko določenimi pogoji. Služnost predstavlja velik in neposreden poseg v lastninsko pravico, saj služnostnemu upravičencu daje pravico do uporabe ali izkoriščanja tuje stvari. Od lastnika služeče stvari sme zahtevati opustitev določenih dejanj, ki bi jih sicer kot lastnik imel pravico izvrševati. V tej zvezi velja izpostaviti, da lastnika služeče nepremičnine breme stvarne služnosti ne more obvezovati k nekemu dejanju. Služnostni upravičenec ima zraven posestnega varstva tudi pravico do petitorne tožbe, ki temelji na podlagi služnostne pravice. Govorimo o posebni tožbi, konfesorni tožbi, katero lahko naperi zoper vsako tretjo osebo oziroma lastnika služeče nepremičnine, kateri omejuje ali onemogoča izvrševanje služnosti. Praviloma pride v poštev, kadar posestno varstvo ni mogoče. Kljub navedenemu pa sodna praksa in teorija podpirata vzporedni tek posesornega in petitornega postopka.
Keywords:posest, posestno varstvo, služnost, služnostni upravičenec, petitorna tožba
Place of publishing:Maribor
Publisher:[K. Fekonja]
Year of publishing:2017
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-68490 New window
UDC:347.26(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:5474859 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:X2UUIDP3
Publication date in DKUM:30.10.2017
Views:1915
Downloads:265
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:PF
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Licences

License:CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Description:The most restrictive Creative Commons license. This only allows people to download and share the work for no commercial gain and for no other purposes.
Licensing start date:22.09.2017

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Protection of possesion concerning easement enforcement with an overview of the case-law
Abstract:Protection of possession represents the protection of actual control over a thing, regardless of the way said control was obtained. The fundamental form of protection of possession is judicial protection with self-help being a subsidiary form of protection of possession. When the court is granting judicial protection, it must take into account the latest condition of the property and the trespass, while self-help can only be used exceptionally under conditions defined by the law. Easement represents a major and direct interference with the ownership right since it gives the dominant owner a right to use or exploit a foreign property. They can demand that the servient owner waives certain acts he would otherwise have the right to exercise as the legal owner. It is worth emphasizing that a real easement cannot bind the servient estate owner to a certain act. Besides protection of possession, the dominant owner has the right to file a petitory action based on an easement. This is a special action, actio confessoria, which can be filed against a third party or the servient estate owner who is restricting or denying easement enforcement. It is generally considered when protection of possession is not possible. Despite this, the case law and legal writing support parallel possessory and petitory processes.
Keywords:possession, protection of possession, easement, dominant owner, petitory action


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica