Javna pooblastila centrov za socialno delo in upravni postopek oddaje otroka v rejništvo

Havle, Špela

| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

First page > Show document

Show document

Title:	Javna pooblastila centrov za socialno delo in upravni postopek oddaje otroka v rejništvo
Authors:	ID Havle, Špela (Author) ID Ferčič, Aleš (Mentor) More about this mentor...
Files:	UN_Havle_Spela_2017.pdf (530,40 KB) MD5: 40A57E5D20BA10286ECD079C508802CF PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/e1c23266-18bc-4122-8f6e-e741a67bb425
Language:	Slovenian
Work type:	Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:	2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:	PF - Faculty of Law
Abstract:	Centrom za socialno delo so z vrsto zakonov podeljena javna pooblastila iz državne pristojnosti – izvajajo vrsto del in nalog, pri čemer so v ospredju socialnovarstvene storitve; določene aktivnosti, s katerimi se odloča o pravicah in obveznostih ter pravnih koristih v upravnih zadevah, pa so vodene po upravnem postopku. Zakon o splošnem upravnem postopku se v upravnih postopkih pred centri za socialno delo uporablja subsidiarno, ko v področnih zakonih ni urejen poseben upravni postopek. Zaradi narave socialnega dela nastaja konflikt med oblastno funkcijo centrov za socialno delo in osnovnimi nalogami svetovanja in pomoči ljudem, saj se prepletata servisna in izvršilna funkcija centrov za socialno delo. Že vrsto let obstaja soglasje, da odločanje centrov za socialno delo z upravnimi odločbami ni najprimernejše, saj so centri za socialno delo postavljeni v več različnih vlog, ki so si med seboj lahko tudi kontradiktorne, zato se bo tovrstno odločanje prestavilo na pristojna sodišča. Potem ko se je v letu 2016 v splošni in strokovni javnosti zgodil odmeven primer 'koroških dečkov', so se v različnih medijskih nastopih starih staršev dečkov in njunih pravnih predstavnikov na eni strani ter predstavnikov ministrstva za delo, družino, socialne zadeve in enake možnosti, centrov za socialno delo in strokovnjakov s področja socialne stroke na drugi strani, so se javno pokazala velika razhajanja v razumevanju in uporabi pravnih predpisov. Izhajajoč iz tega primera smo si zastavili osnovni cilj naše naloge, da proučimo pravno ureditev in prakso pristojnih organov s področja rejništva v Sloveniji ter da opravimo pregled primera 'koroških dečkov'. V raziskavi smo ugotovili, da veljavna zakonodaja na področju rejništva pušča preveč odprtih vprašanj in pravnih praznin, zato v postopkih izvajanja rejniške dejavnosti oziroma izdajanja dovoljenj za izvajanje rejniške dejavnosti prihaja do nezakonite prakse in nejasne ločnice med strokovnim delom in izvajanjem upravnega postopka.
Keywords:	javno pooblastilo, center za socialno delo, upravni postopek, rejništvo.
Place of publishing:	Maribor
Publisher:	[Š. Havle]
Year of publishing:	2017
PID:	20.500.12556/DKUM-68530
UDC:	347.633(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:	5499435
NUK URN:	URN:SI:UM:DK:TUYQPACO
Publication date in DKUM:	21.11.2017
Views:	3098
Downloads:	247
Metadata:
Categories:	PF
:	Copy citation

Average score:	(0 votes)
Your score:	Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:

Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Licences

License:	CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

Link:	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Description:	The most restrictive Creative Commons license. This only allows people to download and share the work for no commercial gain and for no other purposes.
Licensing start date:	25.09.2017

Secondary language

Language:	English
Title:	Public authority orders issued to the local centres for social services and administrative procedures for submission of a child to forster care
Abstract:	By a range of different acts, the social work centres were granted various public authorisations within the state jurisdiction, so they can carry out a number of tasks and assignments, primarily social assistance services, while some activities intended for deciding on the rights or obligations and legal entitlements in administrative matters are conducted in line with the administrative procedure. In administrative procedures, the General Administrative Procedure Act is applied in a subsidiary manner when sector-specific acts do not regulate a special administrative procedure. Due to the nature of social work, a conflict arises between the authoritative function of the social work centres and the fundamental purpose of counselling and helping people, as the functions of executive and servicing nature of social work centres intertwine. Years ago, it was considered inappropriate for social work centres to decide upon administrative affairs since they have various roles that may be mutually exclusive. For this reason, it was established that the administrative decisions shall be made by competent courts. After the striking example of the “Koroška boys” from 2016, various media appearances by grandparents of the two boys and their legal representatives on the one hand, and representatives of the Ministry of Labour, Family, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities, Social Work Centres, and experts in social affairs on the other hand, indicated a wide divergence in their understanding and application of legal regulations. Based on this example, the main goal of the thesis was established, which was to examine the legal regulation and practice of competent authorities in the field of foster care in Slovenia, and to review the case of the “Koroška boys”. The research established that the existing foster care legislation leaves too many open issues and legal gaps, which is why illegal practice emerges both in the provision of foster care as well as in the issuance of foster care permits, while the dividing line between professional work and the implementation of administrative procedures is often blurred.
Keywords:	public authorisation, a social work centre, an administrative procedure, foster care

Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)

0 - 0 / 0

There are no comments!

Back