| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font
First page > Show document

Show document Help

Title:Problem zla
Authors:ID Praprotnik, Aleš (Author)
ID Šuster, Danilo (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf MAG_Praprotnik_Ales_2017.pdf (1,08 MB)
MD5: 9F6440CF8169E4EC42CC9EDA1FC7A99C
PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/13051a14-5758-4ad4-8a7a-9da08b678ac2
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Typology:2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:FF - Faculty of Arts
Abstract:V magistrski nalogi smo obravnavali področje, ki ima zelo bogato zgodovino argumentiranja – problem zla. Glavni problem predstavlja združljivost obstoja zla z obstojem Boga. Zagovorniki teizma pravijo, da je obstoj Boga neodvisen od obstoja zla, medtem ko so nasprotniki, ateisti, prepričani, da eksistenca zla izpodbija obstoj Boga oziroma vsaj eno od njegovih lastnosti – vsemogočnost, vsevednost in moralno popolnost. Proučevali smo logični in evidenčni problem zla in skušali pokazati pomanjkljivosti in prednosti vsakega pristopa. Najslavnejši zagovornik logičnega problema zla je John Leslie Mackie, njegova poanta je nezdružljivost Božjih lastnosti (vsemogočnost, vsevednost in moralna popolnost) z obstojem zla. Najmočnejši ugovor logičnemu problema zla predstavi Alvin Plantinga z obrambo s svobodno voljo, kjer ima človek možnost svobodne odločitve med izbiro dobrega ali slabega dejanja. William L. Rowe je razvil evidenčni problem zla, kjer obstoj zla zmanjšuje moč Boga oziroma celo njegov obstoj. Prav tako smo obravnavali teodiceje, ki veljajo za eno od najstarejših poskusov opravičevanja Božjega dovoljenja zla. S proučevanjem različnih stališč vodilnih avtorjev smo skušali pokazati in dokazati, da je obstoj Boga neodvisen od obstoja zla oziroma da obstoj zla ne zmanjšuje moči Boga.
Keywords:Bog, zlo, logični problem zla, evidenčni problem zla, teodiceja, svobodna volja
Place of publishing:Maribor
Publisher:[A. Praprotnik]
Year of publishing:2017
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-69218 New window
UDC:111.84(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:23965704 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:AMTZDTJU
Publication date in DKUM:23.08.2018
Views:1864
Downloads:168
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:FF
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Licences

License:CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Description:The most restrictive Creative Commons license. This only allows people to download and share the work for no commercial gain and for no other purposes.
Licensing start date:11.12.2017

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:The problem of evil
Abstract:In this thesis, we discussed a field which has a very rich history of arguments – problem of evil. The main problem presents compatibility between the existence of evil and the existence of God. Supporters of theism say that the existence of God is independent of the existence of evil, while opponents, atheists, are convinced that the existence of evil rebuts the existence of God or at least one of his attributes – omnipotence, omniscience, and moral perfection. We studied the logical and evidential problem of evil and tried to show disadvantages and advantages of each approach. The most famous defender of the logical problem of evil is John Leslie Mackie, who points out the incompatibility of God’s attributes (omnipotence, omniscience, and moral perfection) with the existence of evil. The strongest argument against the logical problem from evil is introduced by Alvin Platinga with free will defense, where a human being has a possibility of making a free decision between good or evil deed. William L. Rowe developed the evidential problem of evil, where existence of evil reduces the power of God or even his existence. We also discussed theodicies which are considered to be one of the oldest attempts to justify God’s permission of evil. By examining different approaches of leading authors, we tried to show and prove that the existence of God is independent of the existence of evil or that the existence of evil does not reduce the power of God.
Keywords:God, evil, logical problem of evil, evidential problem of evil, theodicy, free will.


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica