| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:Negativen vpliv konkurence na dejavnost zasebnega varovanja v Republiki Sloveniji
Authors:ID Kolar, Mojca (Author)
ID Repas, Martina (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf MAG_Kolar_Mojca_2018.pdf (2,87 MB)
MD5: 4099F48481BEDC97ECD1E0B4724656C0
PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/0bc5bafa-28e5-48ce-8a03-c7afefe7ef3c
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Typology:2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:PF - Faculty of Law
Abstract:Po osamosvojitvi Slovenije se je na slovenskem trgu začela intenzivno razvijati tudi dejavnost zasebnega varovanja in število varnostnih služb je začelo strmo naraščati. Močna konkurenca med njimi je z leti prinesla v dejavnost varovanja veliko negativnih posledic. Ena izmed teh so tudi plače varnostnega osebja, ki so danes daleč pod slovenskim povprečjem. Toda za sistemom plač zaposlenih stoji plačni sistem storitev na trgu varovanja. Magistrska naloga obravnava problematiko neobičajno nizkih cen fizičnega in tehničnega varovanja, kar je posledica nelojalne konkurence in drugih oblik izkrivljanja konkurence. Nelojalna konkurenca se lahko kaže na različnih področjih, tudi v tistih oblikah, ki jih ZPOmK-1 sicer taksativno ne našteva, vendar kljub temu sodijo v domet generalne klavzule. Zbornica za zasebno varovanje je konec 90. let sprejela sklepe združenja, s katerimi je želela preprečiti nezakonita ravnanja članic in nelojalno konkurenco med njimi. Urad za varstvo konkurence je nato odločil, da predmetni sklepi omejujejo konkurenco in so zato nični. ZPOmK-1 sicer pod določenimi pogoji dovoljuje izjemo od prepovedi sklepanja omejevalnih sporazumov, vendar kljub številnim pozitivnim razlogom ne moremo zagotovo trditi, da bi bil sklep podjetniškega združenja, s katerim bi se določile izhodiščne cene storitev zasebnega varovanja, dovoljen. Glede na to, da bi družbe za zasebno varovanje ali njihovo združenje težko dosegli veljavni sporazum, pa preostane le še vloga zakonodajalca, da uredi problematiko dejavnosti varovanja. V tem primeru govorimo o »izjemi glede na vrsto dejavnosti oz. sektorski izjemi«. Nekatere dejavnosti so namreč zelo pomembne za življenje ljudi ter za nemoteno delovanje organizacij in države. Država lahko takšne dejavnosti opravlja sama, lahko pa v določenem obsegu dejavnost ali del dejavnosti prepusti gospodarskim družbam. Družbe opravljajo dejavnost v javnem interesu države, ta pa njihovo delovanje strogo nadzira. Ena izmed takšnih dejavnosti je tudi zasebno varovanje. V takšnem primeru omejitve konkurence ne moremo pripisati, kot to zahteva 6. člen ZPOmK-1, samostojnemu protikonkurenčnemu dejanju družb in so te zaščitene pred vsemi posledicami kršitve omenjenega člena. Država lahko zato s posebnim zakonom v določenem obsegu regulira plačni sistem dejavnosti in v tem vidimo veliko priložnost za rešitev plačne problematike zasebnega varovanja. Stabilizacija plačnega sistema v dejavnosti zasebnega varovanja bi prispevala k ravoju kakovosti storitve, s tem pa večji varnosti naročnikov ter seveda k večji varnosti in zadovoljstvu zaposlenih.
Keywords:Zasebno varovanje, nelojalna konkurenca, neobičajno nizke cene, omejevalni sporazum, sklep podjetniškega združenja, tarifa storitev varovanja
Place of publishing:[S. l.
Publisher:M. Kolar]
Year of publishing:2018
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-69459 New window
UDC:346.545:343.123.12(043.3)
COBISS.SI-ID:5542187 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:NURKHKQB
Publication date in DKUM:09.02.2018
Views:1911
Downloads:188
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:PF
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Licences

License:CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Description:The most restrictive Creative Commons license. This only allows people to download and share the work for no commercial gain and for no other purposes.
Licensing start date:23.01.2018

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Negative consequences of competition to security companies in slovenia
Abstract:After the independence of Slovenia, the private security began to intensively develop on the Slovenian market, and the number of security services began to rise sharply. Over the years, strong competition between them has brought many negative consequences to the activity of private security. One of these is the salaries of private security personnel, who are now far below the Slovenian average. However, regarding the payroll system, the pay system of services in the security market must be taken into account. The master's thesis addressed the problem of abnormally low prices of physical and technical protection, which is due to unfair competition and other forms of distortion of competition. Unfair competition can be reflected in various areas, including in those forms that are not listed by the ZPOmK-1, but do not fall within the scope of the general clause. At the end of the 1990s, the Chamber for Private Security adopted the decisions to prevent the illegal conduct of members and unfair competition between them. The Competition Protection Office then decided that the decisions in question restrict competition and are therefore void. Although, under certain conditions, ZPOmK-1 allows exemption from the prohibition on the conclusion of restrictive agreements. However, despite numerous positive reasons, it cannot be concluded that the decision of an association of undertakings that determines starting prices of private security services would have been permitted. Given that private security companies or their association find it difficult to reach a valid agreement, only the role of the legislator remains to regulate the issue of private security. Namely in this case, the “exceptions according to the type of activity or sectoral exceptions”. Certain activities are of great importance for people's lives and for the smooth functioning of organisations and the country. A country can carry out such activities by itself. but may also, to a certain extent, leave the activity or part of the activity to another economic entity. Companies or economic entities perform activities in the public interest of the country, and the country is strictly controlling those activities. One of these activities is private security. According to Article 6 of ZPOmK-1, in such a case, restrictions on competition can not be attributed to an independent anti-competitive act by companies and are protected against all the consequences of a violation of that article. The state can therefore, to a certain extent, regulate the salary system of activities by a special law, which can be seen as a good opportunity to solve the salary problems of private security. The stabilization of the salary system in private security could contribute to the improvement of the quality of the service, thereby increasing the security of clients and, of course, to increasing the safety and satisfaction of employees.
Keywords:private security, unfair competition, abnormally low prices, restrictive agreement, decision of an association of undertakings, tariff of security services


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica