| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1206/2001 o medsebojnem sodelovanju med sodišči držav članic pri pridobivanju dokazov v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah in Zakon o pravdnem postopku Republike Slovenije
Authors:ID Betetto, Nina (Author)
ID Univerza v Mariboru (Copyright holder)
Files:.pdf LeXonomica_2010_Betetto_Uredba_Sveta_(ES)_st._12062001_o_medsebojnem_sodelovanju_sodisc_drzav_clanic_pri_pridobivanju_dokazov_v_civilnih.pdf (96,40 KB)
MD5: C240A74C1D674417779D12E7E49DB6EF
PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/e4267b44-de35-48fc-82cc-969cf4c42d6b
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Scientific work
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:PF - Faculty of Law
Abstract:Avtorica v prispevku obravnava nekatera vprašanja v zvezi z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1206/2001 o medsebojnem sodelovanju sodišč držav članic pri pridobivanju dokazov v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah, ki se dotikajo področja njene uporabe z vidika rationae materiae, v povezavi z domačim civilnim procesnim pravom. Pojem pridobivanja dokazov, ki ga je treba razlagati evroavtonomno, se nanaša na vsak sodni ukrep z namenom pridobivanja podatkov, ki sodniku pomaga, da si ustvari prepričanje o pravno relevantnih dejstvih. V zvezi z določbo, da se zaprosilo lahko nanaša tudi na dokaz, ki je namenjen uporabi v predvidenem sodnem postopku, je bolj prepričljivo stališče, da področje uporabe uredbe ne obsega postopkov, ki so z vidika samega pridobivanja dokazov šele informativne narave. Kadar gre za čezmejno pridobivanje dokazov, mora sodišče odločitev o tem, kako bo pridobilo dokaze, sprejeti na podlagi skrbne presoje vseh okoliščin primera. Omenjena uredba se ne nanaša na ekstrateritorialne pozive za predložitev dokazov in ne velja načelo njene ekskluzivnosti, zato je treba odgovor, ali je njihova uporaba dovoljena ali ne, iskati v domačem pravu.
Keywords:civilno procesno pravo, gospodarsko pravo, pravdni postopek, dokazi, dokazni postopek, sodišča, mednarodno sodelovanje, Evropska unija
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Year of publishing:2010
Number of pages:str. 185-198
Numbering:Letn. 2, št. 2
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-71187 New window
ISSN:1855-7147
UDC:347.94(4)
ISSN on article:1855-7147
COBISS.SI-ID:257762816 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:ISBGYXLI
Copyright:Univerza v Mariboru
Publication date in DKUM:23.07.2018
Views:1798
Downloads:109
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:Misc.
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Lexonomica
Publisher:Pravna fakulteta, Pravna fakulteta, University of Maribor Press
ISSN:1855-7147
COBISS.SI-ID:246384128 New window

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Council Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001 on cooperation between the courts of the Member States in the taking of evidence in civil or commercial matters and the Civil Procedure Code of the Republic of Slovenia
Abstract:The author discusses some questions on the Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001 on cooperation between the courts of the Member States in the taking of evidence in civil or commercial matters, within the field of ratione materiae, in connection with domestic civil procedure law. The concept of taking evidence, which should be interpreted euro-autonomous, is referring to any judicial action whose intent is to obtain information that helps the judge to convince himself of legally relevant facts. In regard to the decision, that the request can also refer to evidence, which is used within a regulated judicial procedure, is a more persuasive position, that the regulation does not cover procedures that are in means of taking evidence only of informational nature. When it comes to cross-border taking of evidence, the court must decide how to obtain evidence on the basis of a careful assessment of all the circumstances of the case. The Regulation does not apply to extraterritorial calls for presentation of evidence and nor does apply the principle of its exclusivity, therefore it is necessary to seek the answer, whether their use is allowed or not, in national law.
Keywords:cross-border taking of evidence, the field of application, extraterritorial collection of evidence, foreseen court proceeding


Collection

This document is a part of these collections:
  1. LeXonomica

Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica