| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:Teža iracionalnega v procesu sodniškega odločanja : kognitivne pristranskosti in mehanizmi zasledovanja fikcije razumskosti prava
Authors:ID Stajnko, Jan (Author)
ID Univerza v Mariboru (Copyright holder)
Files:.pdf LeXonomica_2015_Stajnko_Teza_iracionalnega_v_procesu_sodniskega_odlocanja_kognitivne_pristranskosti_in_mehanizmi_zasledovanja_fikcije_r.pdf (437,38 KB)
MD5: E057945C5E0B0A2638F6339B9B26961E
PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/ad18e1da-4a34-4791-a630-06755c4560e3
 
URL http://journals.um.si/index.php/lexonomica/article/view/18
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Scientific work
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:PF - Faculty of Law
Abstract:V modernem pravnem redu igrajo logika, razum in z razumom povezano silogstično sklepanje pomembno vlogo. To ugotovitev avtor primerja s spoznanji moderne psihologije, ki se nanašajo na proces človekovega odločanja. Pri tem se osredotoča predvsem na dve pojavni obliki kognitivnih pristranskosti: sidranje oz. anchoring in retrospektivno pristranskost oz. hindsight bias. Prav tako se avtor vrednostno opredeli do instrumentov, ki so zakonodajalcu na voljo za preprečevanje prekomernega vdora iracionalnega v proces sodniškega odločanja - za zasledovanje fikcije razumskosti prava. V zaključnem delu prispevka je na podlagi tega spoznanja poudarjena potreba po interdisciplinarnem pristopu v pravu. Ta je nujna, ker je le tako mogoče sistematično in samoreflektivno soočanje z iracionalnostjo v procesu sodniškega odločanja.
Keywords:razum, iracionalnost, odločanje, ratio, silogistično sklepanje, pristranskost, logika, pravo, psihologija
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Year of publishing:2015
Number of pages:str. 189-204
Numbering:Letn. 7, št. 2
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-71329 New window
ISSN:1855-7147
UDC:340.1
ISSN on article:1855-7147
COBISS.SI-ID:5140779 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:ZCRTWT0E
Publication date in DKUM:02.08.2018
Views:4054
Downloads:150
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:Misc.
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Lexonomica
Publisher:Pravna fakulteta, Pravna fakulteta, University of Maribor Press
ISSN:1855-7147
COBISS.SI-ID:246384128 New window

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:The role of irrationality in the process of the judicial decision-making : cognitive biases or how to reach the fiction of a rational legal system
Abstract:The article outlines the importance of reason and reasoning based on categorical syllogisms - and the role they play in modern legal thought. The author compares the role of reason in western legal systems with findings concerning the processes of irrational decision-making, as portrayed by modern psychology. Emphasis is given on the role of anchoring and hindsight bias. The mechanisms with which legislators tackle those cognitive illusions are also briefly presented. In the conclusion, the author argues that an interdisciplinary approach to law is necessary to uphold the fiction of law as a rational category. A self-reflective and systematic approach is needed to tackle the problem of irrationality in judicial decision-making. This approach is only possible with knowledge of both, law and psychology.
Keywords:ratio, hindsight bias, anchoring, irrationality, judicial decision-making, logic, law, psychology


Collection

This document is a part of these collections:
  1. LeXonomica

Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica