| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:Policijsko-tožilska preiskava : diplomsko delo
Authors:ID Zidanšek, Ana (Author)
ID Žaberl, Miroslav (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf VS_Zidansek_Ana_2018.pdf (452,09 KB)
MD5: C1031EAC9AD419986BE9C75236E4D32C
PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/676e2f5f-0b80-4145-8214-d817fb08102c
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:FVV - Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security
Abstract:V diplomskem delu je predstavljen potek policijsko-tožilske preiskave. Ta preiskava poteka v predkazenskem postopku in vključuje delo policije, državnega tožilca in preiskovalnega sodnika. Predkazenski postopek temelji na delu policije in državnega tožilca. Policija je tista, ki je največkrat prva seznanjena s storitvijo kaznivega dejanja in mora ukreniti vse potrebno, da zavaruje sledi, odkrije storilca kaznivega dejanja ter doseže najvišjo stopnjo dokaznega standarda, ki omogoča kazenski postopek. Državni tožilec ali z drugimi besedami gospodar postopka usmerja in daje navodila policiji, ki mora zbrati dovolj dokazov, s katerimi državni tožilec ob koncu predkazenskega postopka odloča, kaj bo storil s kazensko ovadbo oziroma če bo nadaljeval kazenski pregon. Da so dokazi zbrani na zakonit način in da ni prišlo do kršitve temeljnih človekovih pravic in svoboščin, skrbi preiskovalni sodnik. Zadolžen je za odrejanje preiskovalnih ukrepov in prikritih preiskovalnih ukrepov, ki hujše posegajo v temeljne človekove pravice in svoboščine, odloča pa tudi o priporu. Zakonska podlaga za delo policije, državnega tožilca in preiskovalnega sodnika je Zakon o kazenskem postopku, ki prinaša kar nekaj težav pri njihovem delu. Spremembe, ki bi jih prinesla nova zakonodaja, pa so prav tako zaskrbljujoče, saj bi postopoma ukinila funkcijo preiskovalnega sodnika in njegova pooblastila prenesla na državnega tožilca in policijo. Težave pri teh spremembah predstavljajo pravice oseb v postopkih, saj bi dejanja, za katera je bil zadolžen in postavljen poseben organ, prenesli na policijo in državnega tožilca, ki imata glavno nalogo odkriti in preganjati storilce kaznivih dejanj. Spremembe zakona so dobrodošle, vendar ne smemo pozabiti na osebne pravice oseb v predkazenskem in kazenskem postopku.
Keywords:diplomske naloge, predkazenski postopek, policija, državni tožilec, preiskovalni sodnik, policijske preiskave
Place of publishing:[Ljubljana
Place of performance:[Ljubljana
Publisher:A. Zidanšek]
Year of publishing:2018
Year of performance:2018
Number of pages:V, 39 str.
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-71424 New window
UDC:351.74:343.1(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:3601386 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:LZFF3UX5
Publication date in DKUM:09.10.2018
Views:2155
Downloads:347
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:FVV
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Police and prosecutors' investigation
Abstract:In the bachelor’s thesis, the course of the police-prosecutor investigation is presented. This investigation occurs in the pre-trial investigation and includes police work and the work of the public prosecutor and the examining magistrate. The pre-trial investigation is based on police work and the work of the public prosecutor. The police are the first to be cognizant with committing the offense and have to do everything necessary to protect the leads, discover the perpetrator of the offense, and to reach the highest level of standard of proof, which enables criminal proceedings. The public prosecutor or, in other words, the master of the procedure, directs and instructs the police who have to collect enough evidence by which the public prosecutor decides what to do with the criminal complaint at the end of the procedure and whether to proceed with criminal prosecution. In order for the proofs to be collected lawfully and in a way that there are no violations of the fundamental human rights and liberties, the examining magistrate is responsible. His duties are a determination of investigating measures and undercover investigative measures which interfere with the fundamental human rights and liberties more severely. He also decides on detention. The legal foundation for the police work, the work of the public prosecutor and the examining magistrate is the Criminal Procedure Act which causes quite a few difficulties in their work. The new amendments to legislation are quite as much alarming, as they would gradually abolish the position of the examining magistrate and transfer its mandate to the public prosecutor and the police. Difficulties with regards to these amendments represent the right of persons in the procedures, as the actions for which a special body was in charge of, would be transferred to the police and the public prosecutor whose main objective is to discover and prosecute the offenders. The amendments to the law are welcome. However, we must not forget the personal rights of persons in the pre-trial investigation and in the criminal prosecution.
Keywords:pre-trial investigation, police, public prosecutor, examining magistrate


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica