| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:The Role of Corrective Feedback in Oral Production
Authors:ID Dorić, Lejla (Author)
ID Javornik, Marija (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
ID Plemenitaš, Katja (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
ID Kukovec, Melita (Comentor)
Files:.pdf MAG_Doric_Lejla_2018.pdf (1,24 MB)
MD5: F071ACCE84A7031538FFEEE99EF54FAE
PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/f604613c-c959-4c25-ad15-9b4a4e983650
 
Language:English
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Typology:2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:FF - Faculty of Arts
Abstract:Foreign language learners make several errors when it comes to instant oral production and one of the crucial qualities of a good teacher is to know when and how to correct them without distracting or discouraging learners from future oral production. The main objective of this master’s thesis is to research different correction techniques and test them on primary school children. Another objective is to evaluate what kind of impact delayed and immediate feedback has on them. This paper is set as a case study based on eight primary school children, whom we thought and observed for a whole school year. All of them differ substantially in intelligibility, personality, learning styles and age. Moreover, as the second method of collecting data a structured interview was used. The main findings of this paper indicate that learners' view on error correction differs substantially from teachers’ beliefs. All learners want to be corrected by immediate feedback; however, some prefer covert methods. They all appreciate a chance to correct themselves, rather than being given the correct answer immediately after they make a mistake. To our surprise, learners are not bothered by immediate feedback. More uptake is shown when they are corrected immediately than after some delay. They dislike delayed feedback, since they tend to forget the errors they made and the feedback seems irrelevant to them.
Keywords:corrective feedback, correcting oral errors, immediate feedback, delayed feedback, covert methods.
Place of publishing:Maribor
Publisher:[L. Dorić]
Year of publishing:2018
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-71949 New window
UDC:37.091.2/.3(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:24093192 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:KYHUJIX8
Publication date in DKUM:22.10.2018
Views:1423
Downloads:186
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:FF
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Licences

License:CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Description:The most restrictive Creative Commons license. This only allows people to download and share the work for no commercial gain and for no other purposes.
Licensing start date:05.09.2018

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Title:Vloga povratne informacije pri ustnem sporočanju
Abstract:Učenci tujih jezikov naredijo več napak, ko gre za takojšnjo ustno sporočanje. Ena od ključnih lastnosti dobrih učiteljev pa je, vedeti kdaj in kako jih popraviti, ne da bi odvrnili ali odvračali učence od bodočega ustnega sporočanja. Glavni cilj te magistrske naloge je raziskati različne načine popravljanja napak in jih preizkusiti na osnovnošolskih otrocih. Drugi cilj je, da ovrednotimo kakšen vpliv ima takojšnja povratna informacija in odložena povratna informacija na učence. Ta magistrska naloga je zastavljena kot študija primera, ki temelji na osmih osnovnošolskih otrocih, ki smo jih učili in opazovali celo šolsko leto. Vsi se bistveno razlikujejo v znanju, osebnosti, učnih stilih in starosti. Poleg tega je bil kot drugi način zbiranja podatkov uporabljen strukturiran razgovor. Glavne ugotovitve tega prispevka kažejo, da se stališče učencev o popravljanju napak bistveno razlikujejo od prepričanj učiteljev. Vsi učenci želijo takojšnje in sprotno popravljanje napak in večina se je boljše odzvala na prikrite metode popravljanja. Vsi želijo biti dani priložnost, da se popravijo sami, kot pa da jim učitelji samo podajo pravilno rešitev takoj, ko se zmotijo. Kljub našim prepričanje, učence ne zmoti takojšnja povratna informacija. Učenci so več znanja pokazali, ko dobijo priložnost, da se takoj popravijo, kot pa po določenem času. Ne marajo odloženih povratnih informacij, saj si težijo zapomnijo kje so storili napake. Obenem, se jim pri odloženi povratni informaciji, popravki ne zdijo več relevantni.
Keywords:korektivna povratna informacija, popravljanje ustnih napak, takojšnja povratna informacija, odložena povratna informacija, prikrite metode.


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica