Kazenskopravni vidik pacientove privolitve v medicinskih posegih

Najdenov, Jana

| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

First page > Show document

Show document

Title:	Kazenskopravni vidik pacientove privolitve v medicinskih posegih
Authors:	ID Najdenov, Jana (Author) ID Šepec, Miha (Mentor) More about this mentor...
Files:	UN_Najdenov_Jana_2018.pdf (540,89 KB) MD5: C318E3E2C72A929920E49C24922CA5F8 PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/2c2a5d9f-0e22-429a-9fa9-c3fcaf554e3a
Language:	Slovenian
Work type:	Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:	2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:	PF - Faculty of Law
Abstract:	Pacientova privolitev je v današnjih časih pogoj za skladnost medicinskega posega z zakonom. Zdravniški poseg brez veljavne privolitve pomeni izvršitev kaznivega dejanja telesne poškodbe, za katero bo zdravnik kaznenskopravno odgovarjal. Pacientova pravica do privolitve v zdravstveno oskrbo je ena izmed treh pravic, ki sestavljajo pacientovo avtonomijo oz. pacientovo pravico do samoodločbe, s katero se pacientu omogoča aktivno sodelovanje v procesu zdravljenja. V zgodovini je bil pacient zgolj objekt, primoran upoštevati zdravnikova navodila, danes pa odnos med zdravnikom in pacientom temelji na partnerstvu. Zdravnik je zavezan spoštovati odločitve in voljo pacienta. V okviru pojasnilne dolžnosti ga mora seznaniti z vsemi pomembnimi dejstvi, da je pacient sposoben oblikovanja razumne odločitve glede zdravljenja. V primeru pacientove nezmožnosti podati veljavno privolitev, protipravnost medicinskega posega izključi nadomestna privolitev, dana s strani tretjih oseb, ki jih zakon zato predvideva. Zdravnik je vedno zavezan ravnati v dobrobit pacienta. Medicinski poseg je dolžan izvesti tudi kadar se zaveda, da je veljavno pacientovo ali nadomestno privolitev nemogoče pridobiti, vendar utemeljeno domneva, da bi se pacient s posegom strinjal. V drugih državah poznajo inkriminacijo samovoljnega zdravljenja, ki jo del sodobne teorije medicinskega kazenskega prava hvali kot najprimernejšo. Na prvi pogled se res zdi primerno sredstvo za varovanje pacientove avtonomije, vendar je treba poudariti, da ne more nadomestiti trenutno sprejetega koncepta varovanja samoodločbe, lahko ga le dopolni.
Keywords:	Pacient, pacientova privolitev, pacientova pravica do privolitve, pacientova avtonomija, zdravniški poseg, pojasnilna dolžnost, nadomestna privolitev, samovoljno zdravljenje.
Place of publishing:	Maribor
Publisher:	[J. Najdenov]
Year of publishing:	2018
PID:	20.500.12556/DKUM-72401
UDC:	342.7:61(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:	5672747
NUK URN:	URN:SI:UM:DK:MAQOYDYE
Publication date in DKUM:	23.11.2018
Views:	1738
Downloads:	149
Metadata:
Categories:	PF
:	Copy citation

Average score:	(0 votes)
Your score:	Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:

Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Licences

License:	CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

Link:	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Description:	The most restrictive Creative Commons license. This only allows people to download and share the work for no commercial gain and for no other purposes.
Licensing start date:	24.09.2018

Secondary language

Language:	English
Title:	Importance of patient's consent in medical procedures in criminal law
Abstract:	Nowadays patient’s consent is a condition for a medical procedure to be in compliance with the law. Medical procedure without valid patient’s consent means commission of a criminal offense, for which the physician will be held responsible. Patient’s right to consent is one of three rights composing patient’s autonomy or patient’s right to self-determination which allows patient to actively participate in treatment process. In the past, the patient was only an object, obliged to follow physician’s instructions. Today, the relationship between a physician and a patient is based on partnership. The decisions and the will of the patient must be respected. It is physician’s duty to disclose all relevant information based on which patient forms reasonable decision regarding treatment. In the event of a patient’s inability to give a valid consent, law allows third parties to consent instead. Physician is always committed to acti in patient’s wellbeing. His medical intervention is also required when he is well aware that it is impossible to obtain patient’s or substitute’s consent, but it is reasonably assumed that the patient agrees with the procedure. Some countries are familiar with incrimination of arbitrary treatment, which is considered by part of modern theory of medical criminal law to be the most appropriate. At first sight it is true but it needs to be pointed out that arbitrary treatment cannot replace currently adopted concept of self-determination, it can only supplement it.
Keywords:	Patient, patient’s consent, patient’s right to consent, patient’s autonomy, medical procedure, medical duty to disclose, substitute consent, arbitrary treatment.

Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)

0 - 0 / 0

There are no comments!

Back