Nepoštene poslovne prakse: analiza primerov sodne prakse zavajajočih dejanj

Florjanc, Nika

| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

First page > Show document

Show document

Title:	Nepoštene poslovne prakse: analiza primerov sodne prakse zavajajočih dejanj
Authors:	ID Florjanc, Nika (Author) ID Repas, Martina (Mentor) More about this mentor...
Files:	UN_Florjanc_Nika_2018.pdf (316,96 KB) MD5: 16C0C9771605BF69C42EA739670CFD9B PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/e0739673-565e-4070-821e-602c7dfc46e0
Language:	Slovenian
Work type:	Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:	2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:	PF - Faculty of Law
Abstract:	Diplomska naloga obravnava zavajajoče nepoštene poslovne prakse, ki se jih poslužujejo trgovci v razmerju do potrošnikov in so urejene v DNPP, ki je bila prenesena v slovenski ZVPNPP. V zvezi s tem pojasni nomotehnično strukturo DNPP ter njeno področje uporabe. Preučuje veliko generalno klavzulo, ki vsebuje splošno prepoved nepoštenih poslovnih praks, mali generalni klavzuli, ki vsebujeta prepoved zavajajočih poslovnih praks, in črno listo prepovedi poslovnih praks, ki je vsebovana v Prilogi I k DNPP, ki se v vseh okoliščinah štejejo za nepoštene. Pri tem naloga zlasti izpostavlja analizo zavajajočih dejanj v DNPP in ZVPNPP ter analizo sodne prakse zavajajočih dejanj. Z analizo primerov Sodišča Evropske unije zavajajočih dejanj preučuje, kako to skozi prakso zagotavlja visoko stopnjo varstva potrošnikov. Sodišče to dosega s pomočjo široke razlage določenih pojmov in v zvezi s tem upošteva široko stvarno področje DNPP ter s pojasnitvijo pojmov, kar posledično potrošniku lajša prepoznanje nepoštenih poslovnih praks. Evropska parlament in Svet sta se ob sprejemu DNPP odločila za maksimalno haromonizacijo s strani držav članic EU. Obravnavan je tudi vpliv takšne harmonizacije DNPP na povečanje zaupanja potrošnikov in trgovcev v čezmejno poslovanje. V nalogi je narejena tudi analiza sodnih primerov v zvezi z maksimalno harmonizacijo DNPP in zavajajočimi dejanji. Na podlagi le-teh naloga ugotavlja, da Sodišče Evropske unije državam članicam prepoveduje nacionalne določbe, ki vsebujejo strožje omejevalne ukrepe, kot jih ureja DNPP. Kar zadeva primere v zvezi z zavajajočimi dejanji, ugotavlja, da je pomembno ločevanje le-teh od zavajajočih opustitev in velike generalne klavzule, upoštevanje seznama črne liste prepovedi ter izvajanje testa poštenosti, po katerem se umesti ravnanje bodisi med poslovne prakse, naštete na črni listi prepovedi, bodisi med majhni generalni klavzuli ali med veliko generalno klavzulo.
Keywords:	nepoštene poslovne prakse, Direktiva o varstvu potrošnikov pred nepoštenimi poslovnimi praksami, Zakon o varstvu potrošnikov pred nepoštenimi poslovnimi praksami, zavajajoča dejanja, zavajajoče opustitve, povprečen potrošnik, črna lista prepovedi
Place of publishing:	Maribor
Publisher:	[N. Florjanc]
Year of publishing:	2018
PID:	20.500.12556/DKUM-72417
UDC:	366(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:	5671467
NUK URN:	URN:SI:UM:DK:IXMBBOG4
Publication date in DKUM:	22.11.2018
Views:	2074
Downloads:	349
Metadata:
Categories:	PF
:	Copy citation

Average score:	(0 votes)
Your score:	Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:

Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Licences

License:	CC BY-ND 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

Link:	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/
Description:	Under the NoDerivatives Creative Commons license one can take a work released under this license and re-distribute it, but it cannot be shared with others in adapted form, and credit must be provided to the author.
Licensing start date:	24.09.2018

Secondary language

Language:	English
Title:	Unfair commercial practises: analysis of case law on misleading pratices
Abstract:	The undergraduate thesis discusses misleading unfair business practices of traders in relation to consumers and are arranged in the UCPD (Unfair Commercial Practices Directive), which was transferred to the Slovenian ZVPNPP (Consumer Protection against Unfair Commercial Practices Act). In relation to this, the thesis explains the non-technical structure of UCPD and its scope. It examines the grand general clause, which contains the general prohibition of unfair business practices, small general clauses, which contain the prohibitions of misleading business practices and blacklist of prohibitions of business practices, which is included in Annex I to the UCPD, which are considered unfair in all circumstances. The thesis especially highlights the analysis of misleading actions in the UCPD and ZVPNPP and the analysis of judicial practice of misleading actions. By analysing the cases of European Court of Justice’s misleading actions, the thesis examines the way of ensuring the high level of consumer protection in practice. The Court achieves this with broad interpretation of certain terms and in relation to this considers the wide subject-matter area of UCPD, and also with the clarification of terms, which makes it easier for consumers to recognise unfair business practices. Upon the adoption of UCPD, the European Parliament and the Council decided for maximum harmonisation by EU member states. It also discusses the effects of such harmonisation of the UCPD on the increased consumers and traders confidence in cross-border businesses. The thesis includes the analysis of juridical cases in relation with maximum harmonisation of the UCPD and misleading actions. Based on the latter, the thesis establishes that the European Court of Justice prohibits the member states from making national provisions that contain stricter restrictive measures than governed by the UCPD. Regarding the cases with misleading actions, the thesis establishes that it is important to distinguish the latter from misleading omissions and the grand general clause, to consider the blacklist prohibitions and implement the fairness test, according to which the behaviour is placed among the business practices on the blacklist of prohibitions on the small or grand general clause.
Keywords:	unfair business practices, Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations, Consumer Protection against Unfair Commercial Practices Act, misleading actions, misleading omissions, average consumer, blacklist of prohibitions

Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)

0 - 0 / 0

There are no comments!

Back