| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:Ocene tveganja in ocene ogroženosti v primerih nasilnih kaznivih dejanj : magistrsko delo
Authors:ID Žnidaršič, Maja (Author)
ID Areh, Igor (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf MAG_Avgustincic_Maja_2019.pdf (1,42 MB)
MD5: D7E81AE4AEF6A7298F09BA6928A0AA24
PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/38b8f8db-2092-4777-8d6a-38124bb28dcd
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Typology:2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:FVV - Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security
Abstract:Ocene tveganja so postale nepogrešljiv pripomoček pri obravnavi kriznih situacij in so se iz managementa prenesla na upravljanje tveganj znotraj kriminalitete. Z raziskovanjem dejavnikov tveganja so strokovnjaki izdelali orodja, ki predvidevajo storitev kaznivega dejanja. Dejavniki tveganja so tisti znaki, ki imajo močen vpliv na izid, izvršitev nasilnega kaznivega dejanja. Ocena tveganja in ocena ogroženosti sta orodja s pomočjo katerih skušamo preprečiti kaznivo dejanje ali ponovno viktimizacijo žrtve. V magistrskem delu smo opredelili področje ter raziskali ali se ocene tveganja uporabljajo tako za storilce kot tudi žrtve kaznivih dejanj, ali zmanjšajo možnost pristranskega ocenjevanja strokovnjakov ter ali so se ocene tveganja v tujini izkazale kot učinkovite v primerih nasilnih kaznivih dejanj. Podrobneje smo naredili pregled učinkovitosti ocen ter njihove omejitve. Izpostavili smo orodja, ki so najpogosteje v uporabi v tujini. S pomočjo pregleda literature ter večjega števila meta-analiz smo ugotovili, da se ocene tveganja uporabljajo za storilce, ocene ogroženosti pa za žrtve kaznivih dejanj. Zaradi pomanjkanja raziskav nismo mogli potrditi niti povsem ovreči tezo ali ocene zmanjšajo možnost pristranskega ocenjevanja strokovnjakov, vendar pa so se ocene izkazale za učinkovite, z omejitvijo, da večina raziskav učinkovitost oziroma napovedno veljavnost orodij primerja z naključno verjetnostjo, ne primerjajo pa učinkovitost z dejanskim izidom, ali se je kaznivo dejanje dejansko zgodilo ali ne.
Keywords:magistrska dela, ocena tveganja, ocena ogroženosti, dejavniki tveganja, nasilna kazniva dejanja, učinkovitost
Place of publishing:Ljubljana
Place of performance:Ljubljana
Publisher:[M. Avguštinčič]
Year of publishing:2018
Year of performance:2018
Number of pages:VIII, 58 str.
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-72937 New window
UDC:343.3/.7(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:3657450 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:UTEBRWI3
Publication date in DKUM:13.02.2019
Views:1825
Downloads:266
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:FVV
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Risk assessment in violence crime cases
Abstract:Risk assessments have become an indispensable tool in addressing the crisis situations and have been transferred from management to the risk management inside criminality. By exploring the risk factors, the experts developed various tools that predict the commission of the offence. Risk factors are the signs that have a strong impact on the outcome, i.e. the execution of the crime. Risk and assessment are the tools that help prevent possible criminal offence or renewed victimisation of individuals. The area was defined in the thesis and research was made on whether the risk assessments are being used for both the perpetrators and the victims, whether they lessen the possibility of biased evaluation, and whether the risk assessment abroad proved to be effective in cases of violent crimes. Effectiveness of assessments and restrictions was examined in detail and tools that are used abroad have been presented. With the review of literature and a number of meta-analyses it was concluded that risk assessments are being used for perpetrators, while the threat assessments are being used for the victims. Due to a lack of research the hypothesis about risk assessments lessening the possibility of biased evaluation could be neither confirmed nor completely refuted. However, the assessments proved effective with a limitation that in most researches the effectiveness or predictive validity of the tools is being compared with random probability and not with the actual outcome, i.e. whether the crime has actually been carried out or not.
Keywords:risk assessments, threat assessments, risk factors, violent crimes, predictive validity


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica