| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:Prepoznava osumljencev kaznivih dejanj po fotografijah : diplomsko delo univerzitetnega študijskega programa Varstvoslovje
Authors:ID Legen, Špela (Author)
ID Areh, Igor (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf UN_Legen_Spela_2019.pdf (1,12 MB)
MD5: E648071086BD5C1449B882E6DAA94CE9
PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/0c12268d-56d9-49fc-8a83-91f1d0f92492
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:FVV - Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security
Abstract:Preiskovalci pri postopku odkrivanja storilcev pogosto uporabljajo na videz preprosto metodo, v resnici pa vse prej kot to, prepoznavo osumljencev po fotografijah. Z napredkom tehnologije, se je večina klasičnih albumov nadomestila z računalniškimi programi, kateri omogočajo hrambo ogromne količine informacij oz. slik. Priča opiše značilnosti storilca, programi pa na podlagi teh značilnosti predlaga fotografije morebitnih osumljencev. Kljub novodobni tehniki, pa imajo še vedno največjo vlogo psihološki procesi in njihov vpliv na prepoznavo. Potek prepoznave po fotografijah je zakonsko določen (46. člen ZNPPol), določen je tudi celoten postopek fotografiranja storilcev. Preiskovalci, ki sodelujejo pri prepoznavi, morajo poznati pravilen postopek prepoznave, pomembno je tudi, da poznajo različne dejavnike, kateri vplivajo na zaznavanje in interpretacijo priče oz. žrtve. Velikokrat pride do napačne prepoznave, zaradi napak pri zaznavi, pozornosti, ter pri samemu spominu priče oz. žrtve. Neučinkovito izvedeni postopki prepoznave so predstavljeni tudi na praktičnih primerih, ki so se zgodili in kateri lahko služijo, kot opozorilo preiskovalcem pri izvajanju le teh. V diplomski nalogi se bom osredotočila na prepoznavo po fotografijah, njeno zakonsko opredelitev, opisala bom sam postopek fotografiranja storilcev, postopek prepoznave, ter napake, ki so lahko posledica vpliva večih različnih dejavnikov. Na kratko bom primerjala razlike med dvema različnima postopkoma izvedbe prepoznavne vrste iz fotografij, ter njuno učinkovitost pri uspešnosti prepoznave. Skozi te ugotovitve bom tudi potrdila oziroma ovrgla eno od postavljenih hipotez. Kritičen je torej pristop preiskovalcev in njihovo upoštevanje dejavnikov, ki vplivajo na pričo oz. žrtev, ter upoštevanje veljavne zakonodaje pri izvedbi postopka. Napake na enem in drugem področju pa hitro privedejo do napačne prepoznave oz. naprej v kazenskem postopku do napačne obsodbe.
Keywords:diplomske naloge, prepoznavanje, prepoznavanje po fotografijah, napake pri prepoznavi, prepoznavanje obrazov, kazniva dejanja, osumljenci
Place of publishing:Ljubljana
Place of performance:Ljubljana
Publisher:[Š. Legen]
Year of publishing:2019
Year of performance:2019
Number of pages:VI, 42 str.
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-73605 New window
UDC:343.98:004(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:3735786 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:ZKTEXACK
Publication date in DKUM:08.07.2019
Views:1592
Downloads:390
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:FVV
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Eyewitness identification of criminal suspects by photos
Abstract:Investigators in the process of perpetrator identification procedures frequently use a method that at first sight seems simple but in reality it is anything but that, identification of criminal suspects by photographs. With the progress of technology classical albums with photographs have been replaced with computer based programs, that asre abl to store a large quantity of information or pictures. From the characteristics of the eyewitness description the programs suggest potential suspects. Despite modern technology, psychological processes still have the most influence and play the most important role in the identification procedure. The course of the identification by photographs procedure is set by law (Article 46 of the act ZNPPol), the whole procedure of taking photographs is also determinated. The investigators that take part in the identification, need to know the correct identification procedure, it is also important that they are familiar with different factors, which influence on the perception and interpretation of the eyewitness or victim. Mistakes in perception, the attention and the memory of the eyewitness or victim, often lead to misidentification of the suspect. Ineffective executions of the identification procedures are presented on practical cases, that really happened and can be used as a warning for the investigators when implementing them. In my disertation I will focuse on identification by photographs, its legal definition, I will compare the differences between two different procedures of displaying photographs, I will discribe the procedure of photographing perpetrators, the procedure of identification and the errors that occur as a consequence of multiple different factors. In short I will compare the differences between two identification procedures by photographs and their effectivness with successful identifications. Based on these findings I will also confirm or disprove one of my hypothesis. The critical thing is therefore the approach of the investigators and their consideration of the factors which influence on the eyewitness or victim, as well as consideration of valid legislation during the procedure. The mistakes made in both areas quickly lead to misidentifications of the suspects and later in criminal proceedings to wrongful convictions.
Keywords:identification, dentification of persons based on photos, identification errors, face identification


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica