| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:FORMATIVNO SPREMLJANJE UČENČEVEGA NAPREDKA PRI TUJEM JEZIKU V OSNOVNI ŠOLI
Authors:ID Kurnik, Mojca (Author)
ID Brumen, Mihaela (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf MAG_Kurnik_Mojca_2019.pdf (1,71 MB)
MD5: B890DF7F0ABA20AFDD31AC65DA9E296D
PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/0653e1b1-f309-4744-b69c-35ac689883b4
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Typology:2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:PEF - Faculty of Education
Abstract:V magistrskem delu smo raziskovali stališča učiteljev do formativnega spremljanja učenčevega napredka pri tujem jeziku (nadalje TJ) v osnovni šoli (nadalje OŠ). V teoretičnem delu na začetku predstavljamo tradicionalne načine spremljanja učenčevega napredka (ocenjevanje, preverjanje). Osrednji del je namenjen formativnemu spremljanju ter uporabi tega pri pouku TJ. V empiričnem delu magistrske naloge smo raziskali stališča učiteljev, ki poučujejo TJ v OŠ, do formativnega spremljanja učenčevega napredka. Pri tem nas je zanimal obstoj razlik glede na izobrazbo, leta poučevanja ter vzgojno-izobraževalno obdobje (nadalje VIO), v katerem poučujejo TJ. V raziskavi je sodelovalo 122 učiteljev, ki poučujejo TJ v OŠ. Rezultati niso pokazali statistično značilnih razlik v pogostosti rabe formativnega spremljanja učenčevega napredka, so pa se pokazale razlike v raznoliki rabi njegovih strategij. Pri tem so najbolj izstopali učitelji, ki poučujejo TJ v 2. in/ali 3. VIO, in tisti, ki ga poučujejo več kot 15 let ter so po izobrazbi učitelji TJ in učitelji TJ (z modulom za poučevanje TJ v 1. VIO). Ugotovili smo, da se učitelji TJ, ter tisti, ki poučujejo TJ dlje časa, pogosteje poslužujejo tradicionalnih načinov spremljanja učenčevega napredka, medtem ko se učitelji RP (z modulom) in učitelji TJ (z modulom) ter tisti, ki poučujejo TJ krajši čas, pogosteje poslužujejo še drugih načinov, s čimer se bolj približajo formativnemu spremljanju znanja učencev.
Keywords:spremljanje napredka, formativno spremljanje, preverjanje znanja, tuji jezik, osnovna šola
Place of publishing:Maribor
Publisher:[M. Kurnik]
Year of publishing:2019
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-73729 New window
UDC:37.091.26:81\'243(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:24709384 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:HTCVGZG5
Publication date in DKUM:29.08.2019
Views:1808
Downloads:372
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:PEF
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Licences

License:CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Description:The most restrictive Creative Commons license. This only allows people to download and share the work for no commercial gain and for no other purposes.
Licensing start date:07.06.2019

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT OF PUPIL'S PROGRESS IN FOREIGN LANGUAGE LEARNING IN PRIMARY SCHOOL CLASSROOMS
Abstract:In the master's thesis we focused on teachers' attitudes to formative assessment of pupils’ foreign language progress in the primary school. In the theoretical part we first presented traditional methods of pupil’s assessment progress. The main part deals with the formative assessment and its use in the foreign language lessons. In the empirical part of the master's thesis we examined the foreign language teachers’ attitudes, who teach in the primary school, to the formative assessment of the pupil's progress. Additionally, we were interested in the existence of differences in terms of teachers' education, years of teaching, and educational level of teaching foreign languages. The study involved 122 teachers who teach foreign languages at primary schools. The results showed that there were no statistically significant differences in the frequency of using formative assessment of pupil’s progress in regard to education, years of teaching, and the educational cycle of teaching foreign languages. However, differences were found in the diverse use of formative assessment strategies of pupil’s progress. Teachers who teach foreign language in the 2nd and/or 3rd educational period and teach foreign languages for more than 15 years, and are according to their education foreign language teachers, and foreign language teachers who finished a teacher training course for teaching foreign languages in the 1st educational cycle, stood out. The results showed that foreign language teachers (without a finished module) and those who teach foreign language for a longer period of time, used the traditional ways of pupil’s assessment progress more often, while class teachers and foreign language teachers with a finished teacher training course, and also those who teach foreign language for a short period of time, used other ways of pupil’s assessment progress more often. They used formative assessment strategies more frequently.
Keywords:monitoring progress, formative assessment, knowledge testing, foreign language, primary school


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica