Priobčitev javnosti v avtorskem pravu v praksi sodišča evropske unije : diplomsko delo

Kuralt, Veronika

| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

First page > Show document

Show document

Title:	Priobčitev javnosti v avtorskem pravu v praksi sodišča evropske unije : diplomsko delo
Authors:	ID Kuralt, Veronika (Author) ID Repas, Martina (Mentor) More about this mentor...
Files:	UN_Kuralt_Veronika_2019.pdf (1,18 MB) MD5: F79F2F9D1A730AFFD68C443150E0DA14 PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/f24b97f1-82df-4cfb-8b05-078d48283e04
Language:	Slovenian
Work type:	Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:	2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:	PF - Faculty of Law
Abstract:	Diplomska naloga obravnava pravico do javne priobčitve del skozi pravne akte in sodno prakso Sodišča EU. V skladu z Direktivo 2001/29 pravica do priobčitve javnosti zajema vsako oddajanje ali retransmisijo dela v javnosti, ki ni prisotna na kraju izvora priobčitve, po žici ali brez, vključno z radiodifuznim oddajanjem. Sodišče EU je v pojem javne priobčitve vpeljalo več meril, ki so mu služila kot pravilo za določitev, ali gre v posamezni obravnavani zadevi za javno priobčitev del ali ne. Pri določenih merilih je Sodišče EU ubralo neko svojstveno razlago, kaj naj bi določeno dejanje z vsemi okoliščinami v okviru določenega merila pravzaprav pomenilo. Vsa merila so se nesistematično snovala s prakso Sodišča EU, ne da bi pri tem izhajala iz teoretičnih pravnih podlag ali oprijemljivih kazalnikov. Kriterij nove javnosti in dejanje hiperpovezav, trenutno veljata za najbolj sporna konstrukta Sodišča EU, katere pravni obstoj je prerekan iz več razlogov. Sodišče EU pri svojem utemeljevanju, nove javnosti, naredilo odmik pri razlagi posameznih določb pravnih aktov na katerih je gradilo temelje nadaljnjega sojenja. Koncept nove javnosti nima prav pozitivnega pridiha nekega trdnega kriterija, s katerim bi lahko določili priobčitev javnosti. Podobno usodo delijo hiperpovezave, ki sicer niso opredeljene kot kriterij priobčitve javnosti, vendar pa so zajete kot dejanje, ki priobči zaščiteno delo javnosti. Ugotavlja se, da je potrebno tudi hiperpovezave izločiti iz priobčitve javnosti. Posledice teh nejasnosti rezultirajo v neenaki sodni praksi pojma javne priobčitve.
Keywords:	avtorsko pravo, avtorska pravica, javna priobčitev del, priobčitev, javnost, nova javnost, hiperpovezave, Direktiva 2001/29, Sodišče EU, Zakon o avtorskih in sorodnih pravicah
Place of publishing:	Maribor
Place of performance:	Maribor
Publisher:	[V. Kuralt]
Year of publishing:	2019
Number of pages:	IV, 42 f.
PID:	20.500.12556/DKUM-73850
UDC:	343.236.1(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:	5755435
NUK URN:	URN:SI:UM:DK:DMFWLA0I
Publication date in DKUM:	05.07.2019
Views:	2362
Downloads:	234
Metadata:
Categories:	PF
:	Copy citation

Average score:	(0 votes)
Your score:	Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:

Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Licences

License:	CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

Link:	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Description:	The most restrictive Creative Commons license. This only allows people to download and share the work for no commercial gain and for no other purposes.
Licensing start date:	20.06.2019

Secondary language

Language:	English
Title:	The right of communication to the public in copyright law in practice of court of justice of european union
Abstract:	The diploma thesis deals with the right of communication to the public through legal acts and legal practice of the Court of Justice of the EU. According to Directive 2001/29, the right of communication to the public should cover any such transmission or retransmission of a work to the public, which is not present at the place of origin of the communication, by wire or wireless means, including broadcasting. In the concept of public communication, the Court of Justice of the EU introduced several criteria that served as a rule for determining whether or not there is a matter of public communication in each individual case. For certain criteria, the Court of Justice of the EU has taken on a specific interpretation of what a particular act, in all circumstances within a given criterion, actually means. All the criteria have been unsystematically formed in the practice of the Court of Justice of the EU, without resulting from the theoretical legal bases or tangible indicators. The criterion of the new public and the act of hyperlinking are currently considered to be the most controversial constructs of the Court of Justice of EU, whose legal existence is disputed for several reasons. In its justification of the new public, the Court of Justice of the EU made a move towards the interpretation of individual provisions of the legal acts on which it laid the foundations for a further judgment. The concept of the new public does not have a very positive hint of a kind of a firm criterion, by which it could determine the communication to the public. A similar destiny is shared by hyperlinking, which is not defined as a criterion of communication to the public, but are recorded as an act that communicates a protected work to the public. It is established that hyperlinking needs to be excluded from communication to the public. The consequences of these ambiguities result in dissimilar case law of the notion of public communication.
Keywords:	Copyright law, copyright, public communication of works, communication, public, new public, hyperlinking, Directive 2001/29, EU Court of Justice, The Copyright and Related Rights Act

Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)

0 - 0 / 0

There are no comments!

Back