Evropeizacija slovenskega upravnega sodstva : magistrsko delo

Požlep, Urška

| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

First page > Show document

Show document

Title:	Evropeizacija slovenskega upravnega sodstva : magistrsko delo
Authors:	ID Požlep, Urška (Author) ID Ferčič, Aleš (Mentor) More about this mentor...
Files:	MAG_Pozlep_Urska_2019.pdf (1,36 MB) MD5: D52D94A3A04AE17614131492E00DDD57 PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/52264e09-d1e2-433a-8f93-15944af9fdae
Language:	Slovenian
Work type:	Master's thesis/paper
Typology:	2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:	PF - Faculty of Law
Abstract:	V tem magistrskem delu je obravnavan institut upravnega spora, ki ga ureja Zakon o upravnem sporu in zagotavlja sodno varstvo pravic in koristi posameznikov nasproti osebam, ki odločajo v upravnem postopku (državnim organom, organom lokalnih skupnosti, nosilcem javnih pooblastil), kadar ni z zakonom določeno kakšno drugo pravno varstvo. Sodni nadzor nad njihovim delovanjem na prvi stopnji izvaja neodvisno in nepristransko specializirano sodišče, tj. Upravno sodišče RS, na drugi stopnji pa Vrhovno sodišče RS, razen če zakon določa drugače. Za celovito razumevanje pravne ureditve upravnega spora je potrebno obravnavati tudi pravo Evropske unije in EKČP oziroma z njo povezano sodno prakso ESČP. Slovenija se je z vstopom v Evropsko unijo zavezala vpeljati pravna pravila EU v svoj nacionalni pravni sistem, posledično so jih vsi organi držav članic pri svojem delu dolžni upoštevati. EU je praviloma izvrševanje prava EU prepustila državam članicam oziroma njihovim pristojnim organom, pri čemer ne praviloma določa, kako mora država članica organizirati svojo lastno upravo in nasploh javno oblast, kar se odraža v načelu nacionalne institucionalne avtonomije. Prav tako je tukaj potrebno omeniti načelo nacionalne postopkovne avtonomije (in njegove meje). Vseeno pa pravo EU vpliva na upravno sodstvo s pomočjo instituta predhodnega odločanja, s katerim Sodišče EU podaja razlago prava EU, pa tudi na druge načine, kot je prikazano v tej magistrski nalogi. Dodatno na slovensko upravno sodstvo vpliva EKČP, predvsem pravica do poštenega sojenja, ki je zajeta v njenem 6. členu. Zaradi kršitve tega člena je bila Republika Slovenija že obsojena zaradi odsotnosti glavne obravnave v postopku pred Upravnim sodiščem in sojenja zaradi nepotrebnega odlašanja.
Keywords:	upravno sodstvo, upravni spor, Evropska konvencija o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin, pravo Evropske Unije, pravica do poštenega sojenja, Zakon o upravnem sporu
Place of publishing:	[Maribor
Place of performance:	[Maribor
Publisher:	U. Požlep]
Year of publishing:	2019
Number of pages:	VIII, 56 f.
PID:	20.500.12556/DKUM-75223
UDC:	342.565.4+351.95(043.3)
COBISS.SI-ID:	5824043
NUK URN:	URN:SI:UM:DK:89SB1A1Y
Publication date in DKUM:	20.12.2019
Views:	1847
Downloads:	457
Metadata:
Categories:	PF
:	Copy citation

Average score:	(0 votes)
Your score:	Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:

Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Licences

License:	CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

Link:	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Description:	The most restrictive Creative Commons license. This only allows people to download and share the work for no commercial gain and for no other purposes.
Licensing start date:	29.09.2019

Secondary language

Language:	English
Title:	Europeanization of the slovenian administrative judiciary
Abstract:	This master's thesis deals with the institute of administrative dispute, which is regulated by the Administrative Dispute Act and provides judicial protection of the rights and benefits of individuals against administrative authorities who make decisions in administrative proceedings (state bodies, bodies of local communities, holders of public authority), unless otherwise provided by other legal protection. The judicial review of their operation at first instance is made by Administrative Court of the Republic of Slovenia, and at the second instance the Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia, unless otherwise provided by law. In order to fully understand the legal regulation of an administrative dispute, it is also necessary to consider the law of the European Union and the ECHR or the ECtHR case-law. With its accession to the European Union, Slovenia has committed itself to introduce EU legal rules into its national legal system. All Member States authorities are obliged to comply with them in their work. The EU left the enforcement of EU law to the Member States or their competent authorities, without generally determining how a Member State should organize its own administration and, in general, public authority, which is reflected in the principle of national institutional autonomy. The principle of national procedural autonomy (and its limits) should also be mentioned here. However, EU law influences administrative justice through a preliminary ruling institute whereby the EU Court of Justice interprets EU law, as well as in other ways, as illustrated in this master's thesis. The Slovenian administrative judiciary is additionally influenced by the ECHR, in particular the right to a fair trial, which is covered by Article 6. For violation of this Article, the Republic of Slovenia has already been convicted for the lack of main trial in Administrative Court’s proceedings and for the unnecessary delay in trial.
Keywords:	Administrative Justice, Administrative Dispute, European Convention on Human Rights, European Union Law, Right to a fair Trial, Administrative Dispute Act.

Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)

0 - 0 / 0

There are no comments!

Back