| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font
First page > Show document

Show document Help

Title:Pravna ureditev izvršbe v praksi : diplomsko delo univerzitetnega študijskega programa Varstvoslovje
Authors:ID Smrekar, Žan (Author)
ID Tičar, Bojan (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf UN_Smrekar_Zan_2020.pdf (504,93 KB)
MD5: 174FF45C984A4B7E5836FB5E9C6DDB93
PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/58acd53d-4ac5-4c7e-84c7-0213061b6ea5
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:FVV - Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security
Abstract:Z diplomsko nalogo sem raziskal Zakon o izvršbi in zavarovanju ter Pravilnik o opravljanju službe izvršitelja in ostalo strokovno literaturo, ki ureja izvršilni postopek v Sloveniji. Živimo v času, kjer je zadolževanje skoraj neizbežno, ker pa včasih dolg ne uspe biti poravnan ustrezno med strankama samima, vskoči v zadevo država. Država je praktične naloge izvršbe zaupala izvršiteljem, ki so samozaposleni in delujejo pod nadzorom Zbornice izvršiteljev Slovenije in Ministrstva za pravosodje. Slovenski Zakon o izvršbi in zavarovanju je bil večkrat noveliran, saj je bodisi varoval dolžnika in je izvršilni postopek veljal za neučinkovitega, bodisi pa privilegiral upnika ter hitrost postopka. Zato je za vse novele zakona veljalo: dva koraka naprej, eden nazaj. Zakonodajalec mora biti pozoren tako na pravice upnika kot dolžnika ter urediti zakon tako, da nobena izmed strank ne zavlačuje postopka brez razloga ter nikogaršnje človekove pravice niso kršene. Izvršba, ki temelji na verodostojni listini, ki jo prejme Centralni oddelek za verodostojno listino, je vložena elektronsko preko spletnega portala in prispeva k razbremenitvi sodišča, saj je ni potrebno vložiti pisno. Čeprav je naš zakon napisan po vzoru avstrijskega zakona o izvršbi, je še vedno opaziti razlike med zakonodajama Avstrije in Slovenije zaradi zgodovinskih in ostalih razlogov. Primerjal pa bom tudi slovenski zakon z ureditvijo izvršilnega področja v Nemčiji. V diplomskem delu sem raziskal največje razlike med državami ter kako poteka čezmejna izvršba v Evropski uniji. S pomočjo pravnih metod sem področje izvršilnega prava raziskal takšnega, kot je zapisan v zakonih, kot tudi s pomočjo strokovnih člankov pregledal, kako naj bi bil zakon v prihodnosti urejen (lat.: de lege ferenda). Na koncu dela pa sem predstavil predloge za izboljšavo in pregledal trenutno stanje v Sloveniji.
Keywords:diplomske naloge, izvršba, izvršitelj, izvršba v Nemčiji in Avstriji, Zakon o izvršbi in zavarovanju, Centralni oddelek za verodostojno listino
Place of publishing:Ljubljana
Place of performance:Ljubljana
Publisher:[Ž. Smrekar]
Year of publishing:2020
Year of performance:2020
Number of pages:VI, 48 str.
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-75968 New window
UDC:351(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:3864042 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:GPBFMKSX
Publication date in DKUM:14.04.2020
Views:1546
Downloads:181
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:FVV
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Legal regulation of claim enforcement in practice
Abstract:In my university degree thesis, I have researched Claim Enforcement and Security Act, Rules on the performance of bailiff services and other professional literature in the field of enforcement procedure here in Slovenia. We live in a time where building debt overtime is almost inevitable and when debt fails to be settled between the parties properly, comes the role of court. The court has entrusted the practical tasks of all enforcement procedures to the Bailiffs, who are self-employed and act under the control of the Chamber of Bailiffs and Ministry of Justice. Claim Enforcement and Security Act has been regularly amended, because it either overly protected the debtor and therefore made the Claim Enforcement and Security Act inefficient, or it privileged the creditor and the speed of the proceedings. All amendments had something in common: it moved two steps forward and one step back. The legislator must pay attention to both, the creditor and the debtor’s rights and after regulating the law accordingly, so that neither party delays the proceedings and no one’s human rights are violated. Claim Enforcement based on a genuine document is received by the Central Department of Genuine Document and is filed automatically through and online portal. This contributes to lowering the burden of the courts as it does not have to be filed in writing. Even though the Claim Enforcement and Security Act is based on the Austrian act, there are still differences between the laws of Austria and Slovenia for historical and other reasons. I will also compare the law and regulation in Slovenia with laws in Germany. With my university degree thesis, I have also analyzed the biggest differences between countries and how cross-border claim enforcement is being regulated in the European Union. With the help of legal methods, I explored the field of enforcement law in theory, as enshrined in the laws. I have also read several professional articles on the topic of how the law should be regulated in the future – de lege ferenda. At the end of my work I have also presented suggestions for improvement and reviewed the current status in Slovenia.
Keywords:Claim enforcement, Bailiff, claim enforcement in Germany and Austria, Claim Enforcement and Security Act, Central Department of Genuine Document.


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica