Primerjava pooblastil lovskega in ribiškega čuvaja ter naravovarstvenega nadzornika

Krope, Srečko; Milutinović, Dragan

| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

First page > Show document

Show document

Title:	Primerjava pooblastil lovskega in ribiškega čuvaja ter naravovarstvenega nadzornika
Authors:	ID Krope, Srečko (Author) ID Milutinović, Dragan (Author)
Files:	https://www.fvv.um.si/rv/arhiv/2019-3/02_Krope_Milutinovic_rV_2019-3.html https://www.fvv.um.si/rv/arhiv/2019-3/02_Krope_Milutinovic_rV_2019-3.pdf
Language:	Slovenian
Work type:	Scientific work
Typology:	1.04 - Professional Article
Organization:	FVV - Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security
Abstract:	Namen prispevka: Namen prispevka je predstaviti delovanje in pooblastila lovskih, ribiških čuvajev in naravovarstvenih nadzornikov, pri tem pa povzeti dosedanjo zakonodajo, ugotoviti enakost ali različnost njihovih pooblastil in predlagati morebitne spremembe pri izvajanju nalog in uporabi pooblastil. Metode: Prispevek temelji na pregledu in analizi obstoječe literature s področja varstva narave, lovstva, ribištva in prekrškovne zakonodaje ter področja pooblastil. Ugotovitve: Ugotovili smo, da bi bilo treba zaradi nestrokovnega izrazoslovja in poenotenja pooblastil nadzorno-čuvajske službe v zakonodaji ustrezneje »konkretizirati« in spremeniti, jih združiti v enotna pooblastila, zagotoviti praktično usposabljanje (ki ga izvaja policija), opraviti strokovno usposabljanje in preizkus znanja za vodenje ter odločanje v prekrškovnem postopku in uvesti enotne uniforme za nadzorno-čuvajsko službo. Praktična uporabnost: V zadnjih nekaj letih je v okviru nevladnih organizacij precej polemik o tem, kdo ima pooblastila in kakšna so ta pooblastila. Zlasti se s to problematiko veliko ukvarja Lovska zveza Slovenije, ki za svoje lovske čuvaje želi pridobiti nekoliko več pooblastil, ki bi bila podobna pooblastilom naravovarstvenih nadzornikov. Izvirnost/pomembnost prispevka: Primerjave obravnavanih pooblastil do zdaj v Sloveniji še ni bilo, zato prispevek predstavlja začetek razprav o pooblastilih, izobraževanju in usposabljanju ter vodenju prekrškovnega postopka.
Keywords:	lovski čuvaj, ribiški čuvaj, naravovarstveni nadzornik, pooblastila
Publication status:	Published
Publication version:	Version of Record
Year of publishing:	2019
Number of pages:	str. 248-263
Numbering:	Letn. 21, št. 3
PID:	20.500.12556/DKUM-76023
UDC:	(639.2+639.1):351.78
ISSN on article:	1580-0253
COBISS.SI-ID:	3823850
NUK URN:	URN:SI:UM:DK:I4FHJIRR
Publication date in DKUM:	07.04.2020
Views:	976
Downloads:	70
Metadata:
Categories:	Misc.
:	Copy citation

Average score:	(0 votes)
Your score:	Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:

Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Record is a part of a journal

Title:	Varstvoslovje
Shortened title:	Varstvoslovje
Publisher:	Ministrstvo za notranje zadeve Republike Slovenije, Visoka policijsko-varnostna šola, Ministrstvo za notranje zadeve Republike Slovenije, Visoka policijsko-varnostna šola, Univerza v Mariboru, Fakulteta za policijsko-varnostne vede, Univerza v Mariboru, Fakulteta za varnostne vede
ISSN:	1580-0253
COBISS.SI-ID:	99492352

Licences

License:	CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

Link:	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:	This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.
Licensing start date:	07.04.2020

Secondary language

Language:	English
Title:	Comparison of Powers of the Game and Fish Warden and the Environmental Supervisor
Abstract:	Purpose: The aim of the paper is to present activities and powers of the game and fish wardens and the environmental supervisors. Therefore, the review of legislation, the comparison of powers, and the assessment of similarities and differences between them are made. The paper suggests some possible changes in the performance of tasks and the use of powers for game and fishing wardens. Design/Methods/Approach: The article is based on the literature review and analysis of existing legislation in the field of nature conservation, hunting and fishing. Findings: Non-professional terminology and unequal powers of the supervisory-warden services have been identified. It is crucial to properly concretise and change the powers at least in the legislation. The powers should be harmonised and the terminology standardised. The practical training should be provided (by the police) for wardens, who should undergo professional training and pass the professional examination to prove leadership and decision-making competencies in the misdemeanour procedure. The common uniforms for the supervisory-warden services should be introduced. Practical Implications: There has been a debate within the NGOs in the last few years about the powers: who has or should have the powers and what kind of powers are suitable for them. The Hunting federation of Slovenia is particularly concerned with this issue, since they want to obtain more powers for game wardens, the powers that would be similar for example to the environmental supervisors. Originality/Value: A comparison of the powers of the discussed subjects has not yet been presented nor a comparison has been made. Therefore, this contribution represents the beginning of debate on powers, education and training, and on the conduct of misdemeanour operations.

Collection

This document is a part of these collections:

Varstvoslovje

Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)

0 - 0 / 0

There are no comments!

Back