| Title: | Private security regulation in Hungary and Slovenia - a comparative study based on legislation and societal foundations |
|---|
| Authors: | ID Sotlar, Andrej (Author)
ID Christián, László (Author) |
|---|
| Files: |  https://www.fvv.um.si/rv/arhiv/2018-2/01_Christian_Sotlar_rV_2018-2.pdf
https://www.fvv.um.si/rv/arhiv/2018-2/01_Christian_Sotlar_rV_2018-2.html
 RAZ_Sotlar_Andrej_2018.pdf (389,00 KB)
MD5: 4B4BB72AA5166CA0237F37424435B29A
PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/355c69a8-6ca8-48a0-bf38-4d8df5ee40da
|
|---|
| Language: | English |
|---|
| Work type: | Scientific work |
|---|
| Typology: | 1.01 - Original Scientific Article |
|---|
| Organization: | FVV - Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security
|
|---|
| Abstract: | Purpose: The purpose of the article is to conduct a comparative study of private security regulation in Hungary and Slovenia using Button-Stiernstedt’s evaluation model based on legislation and societal foundations and to find out where the two countries are in comparison with other EU member states. Design/Methods/Approach: First, the main characteristics of private security in Hungary and Slovenia are analysed and presented through a literature and legislation review. Second, Button-Stiernstedt’s evaluation model using legislation and societal criteria is studied and explained. Third, this evaluation model is used to evaluate private security in both countries and, fourth, Hungarian and Slovenian private security regulations are ranked on a regulatory system scale of 27 EU member states.Findings: In this re-evaluation, Slovenian private security regulation received 94 points which makes it equal to Belgium that holds first place among 27 EU countries. Hungary received 74 points, ranking it seventh with the same number of points as Ireland. Although Hungary seems to score relatively highly in the survey, this does not mean the situation in practice is positive. Button-Stiernstedt’s private security regulation evaluation model is mostly useful for international comparisons. However, we suggest that in the future some criteria be used more flexibly than the authors proposed in 2016. Research Limitations: Limitations of the researcharise from the fact that the presented evaluation model of private security regulation is not yet fully developed and that not all data on private security in both countries were available. Practical Implications: The findings are useful for both further harmonising private security regulation within the EU and improving the presented evaluation model to make international comparisons more precise. VARSTVOSLOVJE,Journal of CriminalJustice and Security,year 20no. 2pp. 143‒162
144Originality/Value: Hungarian private security regulation is evaluated for the first time using Button-Stiernstedt’s evaluation model. |
|---|
| Publication status: | Published |
|---|
| Publication version: | Version of Record |
|---|
| Year of publishing: | 2018 |
|---|
| Number of pages: | str. 143-162 |
|---|
| Numbering: | Letn. 20, št. 2 |
|---|
| PID: | 20.500.12556/DKUM-76093  |
|---|
| UDC: | 351.746.2(439)(497.4) |
|---|
| ISSN on article: | 1580-0253 |
|---|
| COBISS.SI-ID: | 3581418 |
|---|
| NUK URN: | URN:SI:UM:DK:WQWOS0UX |
|---|
| Publication date in DKUM: | 16.04.2020 |
|---|
| Views: | 720 |
|---|
| Downloads: | 82 |
|---|
| Metadata: |    |
|---|
| Categories: | Misc.
|
|---|
|
:
|
Copy citation |
|---|
| | | | Average score: | (0 votes) |
|---|
| Your score: | Voting is allowed only for logged in users. |
|---|
| Share: |  |
|---|
Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click
on the title to get all document metadata. |
