| Title: | Comparison of and demarcation between selected economic minor offences and economic criminal offences |
|---|
| Authors: | ID Geršak, Bojan (Author)
ID Bratina, Borut (Author)
ID Srakar, Andrej (Author) |
|---|
| Files: |  04_Gersak_et_al_rV_2015-2.pdf (669,18 KB)
MD5: 7E4E207C0449462C9BFF1C36E0AB7241
PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/184f0e76-4176-4894-8d2f-e98566b5f800
 https://www.fvv.um.si/rV/arhiv/2015-2/04_Gersak_et_al_rV_2015-2-E.html
|
|---|
| Language: | English |
|---|
| Work type: | Scientific work |
|---|
| Typology: | 1.01 - Original Scientific Article |
|---|
| Organization: | FVV - Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security
|
|---|
| Abstract: | Purpose:
In the article, we are discussing demarcations between selected economic minor offences and selected economic criminal offences: Fraud in Securities Trading; Abuse of Insider Information; Disclosure and Unauthorised Acquisition of Trade Secrets. By now, this topic has been given virtually no attention in legal literature. Criminal law theory has mainly addressed only the question of which criteria to use in order to recognise criminal offences amongst all unlawful actions, while on the other hand, law of minor offences has generally focused strictly on less serious unlawful actions. However, in practice, a certain action can sometimes correspond to the definition of both a criminal offence and a minor offence. Consequently, it is of the essence that the statutory elements of a particular unlawful action are precisely defined and clearly demarcated. Only this can ensure legal certainty that should be guaranteed to everyone already on the basis of the Constitution of the Republic of Slovenia. A problem arises if the statutory elements of a criminal offence and a minor offence completely overlap, which leads to legal uncertainty.
Design/Methods/Approach:
The research is based on a quantitative investigation in the course of which we conducted a survey in order to test our assumption. First, we used basic one sided t tests on the data from section 1 questions to try our general assumption. Afterwards, we designed three sets of factors using factor analysis in order to use them on questions from sections 2–6, 7 and 8. In the last part, we took all the designed variables and some other basic information on respondents and used them in regression models for analysis of factors that affect the opinion on adequacy of Slovenian legislation regarding sanctioning and prosecution of economic crime.
Findings:
With the research, we wished to obtain new knowledge on the adequate demarcation between selected economic minor offences and selected criminal offences. In practice, it is material that statutory elements of a particular unlawful action are clearly defined. On the basis of our findings we propose elimination of legal vacuum in which the chosen legal articles for minor economic offences and criminal offences overlap.
Research Limitations / Implications:
Limitations of the present article mostly relate to the availability of data and the willingness of state agencies for cooperation in the research. This relates to the quality of primary and secondary data, particularly to the issues related with consistency in data collection and data accuracy (unwillingness of the respondents to complete the survey and the problems of time and sectorial consistency in the definitions of individual statistical variables).
Practical Implications:
Results of the study can provide recommendations for the consequent changes in the studied legislation and clearer demarcation of legal articles on the chosen economic and criminal offences with the purpose of strengthening of respective legal protection.
Namely, this is the only way to ensure legal certainty that should be guaranteed to everyone on the basis of the Constitution of the Republic of Slovenia.
Originality/Value:
Value of this article is in the empirical demonstration and normative arrangement of a specific field of law, i.e., the legislation in the field of sanctioning and prosecution of economic crime. |
|---|
| Keywords: | economic criminal offences, economic minor offences, demarcation, legal certainty, unlawful actions |
|---|
| Publication status: | Published |
|---|
| Publication version: | Version of Record |
|---|
| Year of publishing: | 2015 |
|---|
| Number of pages: | str. 167-193 |
|---|
| Numbering: | Letn. 17, št. 2 |
|---|
| PID: | 20.500.12556/DKUM-76119  |
|---|
| UDC: | 343.37 |
|---|
| ISSN on article: | 1580-0253 |
|---|
| COBISS.SI-ID: | 3001322 |
|---|
| NUK URN: | URN:SI:UM:DK:9N2C5UNU |
|---|
| Publication date in DKUM: | 16.04.2020 |
|---|
| Views: | 1119 |
|---|
| Downloads: | 78 |
|---|
| Metadata: |    |
|---|
| Categories: | Misc.
|
|---|
|
:
|
Copy citation |
|---|
| | | | Average score: | (0 votes) |
|---|
| Your score: | Voting is allowed only for logged in users. |
|---|
| Share: |  |
|---|
Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click
on the title to get all document metadata. |
