| Title: | Risks and benefits of interpreter-mediated police interviews |
|---|
| Authors: | ID Goodman-Delahunty, Jane (Author)
ID Martschuk, Natalie (Author) |
|---|
| Files: |  https://www.fvv.um.si/rv/arhiv/2016-4/05_Goodman-Delahunty%20_Martschuk_rV_2016-4.html
https://www.fvv.um.si/rv/arhiv/2016-4/05_Goodman-Delahunty%20_Martschuk_rV_2016-4.pdf
|
|---|
| Language: | English |
|---|
| Work type: | Scientific work |
|---|
| Typology: | 1.01 - Original Scientific Article |
|---|
| Organization: | FVV - Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security
|
|---|
| Abstract: | Purpose:
To identify best practice in interpreter use in suspect and intelligence interviews conducted by an international sample of experienced law enforcement practitioners in Asian Pacific jurisdictions (Australia, Indonesia, Philippines, South Korea and Sri Lanka).
Methods:
Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 121 practitioners who described their experiences with and perceptions of interpreter-mediated interviews. Responses were transcribed and coded by trained research assistants, achieving a high degree of inter-rater reliability.
Findings:
The practitioners agreed that interpreters changed the interview dynamic, and identified benefits and risks of interpreter use. The responses revealed misconceptions about interpreter codes of practice regarding neutrality. Major concerns were maintaining control of the interview, accuracy loss, maintenance of nonverbal communication, interview duration and fatigue. Strategies used to manage interviews were the selection of the interpreter, advance preparation regarding ground rules and content, and placement of the interpreter (behind/ adjacent to the interviewee). The key to a successful interview was a skilled, experienced interpreter.
Research Limitations:
Although the purposive sample was not representative, data from multiple practitioners revealed commonalities across jurisdictions. Self-reports are subject to memory distortions and cannot be validated, thus future research in a controlled experiment is recommended.
Practical Implications:
Interviewer training is needed: (i) to familiarise interviewers with differences between trained, accredited interpreters and untrained bilinguals; and (ii) effective strategies to ensure accurate information, maintain nonverbal communication and the legal right of interviewees to a fair interview.
Originality/Value:
Unique insights were gained from experienced practitioners in the field on an important global issue. Their observations hold significance for interviewing practitioners, interview training programmes, and researchers. |
|---|
| Publication status: | Published |
|---|
| Publication version: | Version of Record |
|---|
| Year of publishing: | 2016 |
|---|
| Number of pages: | str. 451-471 |
|---|
| Numbering: | Letn. 18, št. 4 |
|---|
| PID: | 20.500.12556/DKUM-76161  |
|---|
| UDC: | 159.9:340.6 |
|---|
| ISSN on article: | 1580-0253 |
|---|
| COBISS.SI-ID: | 3290346 |
|---|
| NUK URN: | URN:SI:UM:DK:BTTEXWVB |
|---|
| Publication date in DKUM: | 20.04.2020 |
|---|
| Views: | 846 |
|---|
| Downloads: | 38 |
|---|
| Metadata: |    |
|---|
| Categories: | Misc.
|
|---|
|
:
|
Copy citation |
|---|
| | | | Average score: | (0 votes) |
|---|
| Your score: | Voting is allowed only for logged in users. |
|---|
| Share: |  |
|---|
Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click
on the title to get all document metadata. |
