Kritičen razmislek o Reidovi zasliševalski tehniki

Areh, Igor

| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

First page > Show document

Show document

Title:	Kritičen razmislek o Reidovi zasliševalski tehniki
Authors:	ID Areh, Igor (Author)
Files:	07_ACriticalReviewOfReidsInterrogationTechnique_2013_3.pdf (345,17 KB) MD5: 214B0508BF506232C3EFD8D1C47E38C3 PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/60cea195-887c-451d-bee0-76d3447e20ce https://www.fvv.um.si/rV/arhiv/2013-3/07_ACriticalReviewOfReidsInterrogationTechnique_2013_3.html
Language:	Slovenian
Work type:	Professional work
Typology:	1.04 - Professional Article
Organization:	FVV - Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security
Abstract:	Namen prispevka: Avtor želi opozoriti na vzpostavitev kritične distance do zasliševalskih tehnik, ki prihajajo predvsem iz ZDA. Ker je forenzična psihologija v Sloveniji slabo razvita, se tuje znanje s tega področja pogosto prenaša v naše okolje prenagljeno in brez poglobljenih strokovnih analiz, uporabniki tako prenesenega znanja pa so pogosto zavedeni. Ugotovitve: Zaradi razlik v zakonodaji Slovenije in ZDA se prisilne zasliševalske tehnike, kot je na primer Reidova, pri nas ne uporabljajo. Kljub temu pa lahko opazimo, da kar nekaj znanja kriminalistov izhaja iz zasliševalskih priročnikov, za katere velja, da so predvsem zbirke subjektivnih izkušenj avtorjev. Ti svoje priročnike agresivno tržijo in jih zavajajoče predstavljajo kot znanstveno utemeljene tehnike. Resnica je drugačna: priročniki temeljijo na nepreverjenih domnevah in na dvomljivih raziskovalnih ugotovitvah, obenem pa avtorji izkazujejo očitno nepoznavanje osnovnih psiholoških in metodoloških znanj. Praktična uporabnost: V prispevku so predstavljene glavne kritike tipičnega predstavnika prisilnih zasliševalskih tehnik – Reidove tehnike. Raziskave zadnjih desetletij kažejo, da je uporaba takšnih tehnik neupravičena, saj znanost njihovih ugotovitev ne potrjuje, ali pa jim celo nasprotuje. Pri preiskovalcih, ki so pod vplivom priročnikov, se pojavljata napihovanje samozavesti in neučinkovitost prepoznavanja zavajanja, hkrati pa se poveča tveganje za pojav izsiljenega priznanja. Zaradi naštetega bi bilo dobro, da se v praksi preneha z uporabo priročnikov. Izvirnost/pomembnost prispevka: Današnja znanstvena dognanja in sodobni standardi varovanja človekovih pravic zavračajo uporabo Reidove tehnike, zato bi bilo treba tudi v slovenski preiskovalni praksi čim prej prevzeti in prilagoditi sodobne modele preiskovalnega intervjuvanja.
Keywords:	zasliševanje, Reidova tehnika, kritična analiza, psevdoznanost
Publication status:	Published
Publication version:	Version of Record
Year of publishing:	2013
Number of pages:	str. 398-407
Numbering:	Letn. 15, št. 3
PID:	20.500.12556/DKUM-76179
UDC:	159.9:340.6
ISSN on article:	1580-0253
COBISS.SI-ID:	2653674
NUK URN:	URN:SI:UM:DK:28JVWBSN
Publication date in DKUM:	21.04.2020
Views:	1256
Downloads:	77
Metadata:
Categories:	Misc.
:	Copy citation

Average score:	(0 votes)
Your score:	Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:

Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Record is a part of a journal

Title:	Varstvoslovje
Shortened title:	Varstvoslovje
Publisher:	Ministrstvo za notranje zadeve Republike Slovenije, Visoka policijsko-varnostna šola, Ministrstvo za notranje zadeve Republike Slovenije, Visoka policijsko-varnostna šola, Univerza v Mariboru, Fakulteta za policijsko-varnostne vede, Univerza v Mariboru, Fakulteta za varnostne vede
ISSN:	1580-0253
COBISS.SI-ID:	99492352

Licences

License:	CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

Link:	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:	This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.
Licensing start date:	21.04.2020

Secondary language

Language:	English
Title:	A critical review of Reid's interrogation technique
Abstract:	Purpose: In Slovenia, forensic psychology is not a developed science and that may be one of the main reasons why coercive interrogation techniques are recklessly driven into a criminal investigation practice. The purpose of the paper is to critically evaluate Reid's interrogation technique in the context of forensic psychology. Findings: Coercive interrogation techniques like Reid’s are not used in Slovenia due to legislation limitations, which in comparison with the USA essentially restrict psychological manipulation with a suspect. Nevertheless an important share of interrogation knowledge of criminal investigators comes from commercial interrogation manuals, which are scientifically recognised as subjective and as common sense knowledge based on personal experiences of their authors. Interrogation manuals are misleadingly presented as scientific work, although they are founded on mostly unconfirmed assumptions and dubious research results, besides authors show obvious lack of elementary psychological and methodological knowledge. Practical implications: The main critiques of Reid's technique, which is the most noticeable representative of coercive interrogation techniques, are presented. Research done in the past decades shows that there is no scientific justification for applying such an interrogation technique. Results published in peer reviewed papers do not confirm assumptions and in some instances even disapprove claims which are presented in manuals. Criminal investigators who are using such knowledge have tendency to be over-confident and inefficient in recognition of deception, there is also a higher probability to extract a false confession during their work. Because of that it would be appropriate to stop using interrogation manuals of that kind. Originality/Value: On the base of today's scientific knowledge available and considering contemporary human rights standards, the use of Reid's interrogation technique (or even parts of it) is not justified. In Slovenia such an interrogation practises they should be completely rejected and new contemporary interrogation models of investigative interview should be considered.
Keywords:	interrogation, Reid's technique, critical analyses, pseudoscience

Collection

This document is a part of these collections:

Varstvoslovje

Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)

0 - 0 / 0

There are no comments!

Back