| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:Zaznavanje laganja in pregled nekaterih tehnik ugotavljanja laži : diplomsko delo univerzitetnega študijskega programa Varstvoslovje
Authors:ID Gantar, Neja (Author)
ID Areh, Igor (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf UN_Gantar_Neja_2020.pdf (1,12 MB)
MD5: 7DB0EE7BBB13698C4991790219E9D034
PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/d308731d-f268-4f90-b24a-1986a76dfa4e
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:FVV - Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security
Abstract:Laž je izjava, ki jo oseba poda zavestno in prostovoljno, njen namen pa je nekoga spraviti v zmoto. Ni pomembno ali je poskus uspešen ali ne. Laganje samo po sebi sicer ni ilegalno in večino nas ne bi zdržalo dneva brez manjših laži. Verjetno najbolj znano prepričanje o zaznavanju zavajanja je, da bodo lažnivci odvrnili pogled ter kazali znake živčnosti, a vendar sta omenjena vedenja odvisna od človeka, situacije v kateri je in nenazadnje tudi od preiskovalca, s katerim se oseba pogovarja. Zaključno delo se osredotoča na primerjavo izbranih tehnik ugotavljanja zavajanj, natančneje, njihovo uspešnost. Cilj diplomske naloge je poglobiti znanje o lažeh ter o odkrivanju le-teh, katere tehnike ugotavljanja zavajanja so primerne za uporabo v predkazenskem postopku in kaj lahko z njimi ugotovimo. V prvem delu diplomske naloge je zajet kratek pregled razlogov, zakaj ljudje lažemo, kakšne laži pripovedujemo, značilnosti dobrih lažnivcev, kakšna je naša sposobnost zaznave laži ter katere so pogoste napake pri zaznavi zavajanja. V drugem delu so opisane izbrane tehnike zaznavanja zavajanja ter ocene njihove učinkovitosti, pridobljene iz primarnih raziskav in virov. Skozi zaključno delo sem, s pregledom že obstoječih raziskav, potrdila dve hipotezi, eno pa ovrgla. S preverjanjem hipotez sem ugotovila, da je za uspešnejše ocenjevanje izjav potrebno upoštevati tako besedne kot nebesedne znake ter da imajo novejše tehnike laži višjo uspešnost, kot pa starejše. Kljub temu, da imajo osebe z antisocialnimi osebnostmi prednost pri laganju, pa to še ne pomeni, da jim gre zaznavanje le – tega kaj bolje od rok.
Keywords:diplomske naloge, znaki prevare, zavajanje, tehnike ugotavljanja laži, vedenje, govor
Place of publishing:Ljubljana
Place of performance:Ljubljana
Publisher:[N. Gantar]
Year of publishing:2020
Year of performance:2020
Number of pages:IV, 33 str.
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-76270 New window
UDC:159.925.8:177.3(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:19532291 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:MDNB1CJY
Publication date in DKUM:12.06.2020
Views:1373
Downloads:290
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:FVV
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Lie detection and a review of some lie detection techniques
Abstract:A lie is a conscious and voluntary statement made by someone who is intention is to deceit the other person. It is not important whether the attempt is successful or not. Lying by itself is not illegal, and most of us could not go a day without telling at least little white lies. Probably the most common belief in lie detection is that liars averse gaze and that they appear fidgety and nervous, but the mentioned behaviours depend on the person, the situation that he/she is in and the investigator and his behaviour. The thesis focuses on the comparison of selected deception techniques, more specifically, on their effectiveness. The diploma aims to deepen the knowledge about lies and to find out which deception techniques are suitable for use in the pre-trial procedure and what which cues of deception we can detect with them. The first section of the thesis gives a brief overview of the reasons why we lie to people, what lies we tell, the characteristics of good liars, what our ability to detect lies is and what are the common mistakes in detecting deception. The second section describes selected deception detection techniques and evaluates their effectiveness derived from primary research and sources. In the course of our research, we confirmed two hypotheses and refuted one by reviewing existing research. By testing the hypotheses, firstly we found that both verbal and non-verbal cues are needed to evaluate statements more successfully; secondly, newer lie techniques have higher performance than older ones. Thirdly, even though people with antisocial personalities have the advantage in lying, this does not mean that they are better at detecting it.
Keywords:cues to deceit, deception, lie – detection techniques, behaviour, speech


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica