| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:Pregled zakonske ureditve pritožbenih postopkov zoper delo policije : diplomsko delo visokošolskega študijskega programa Varnost in policijsko delo
Authors:ID Ceglar, Metka (Author)
ID Tičar, Bojan (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf VS_Ceglar_Metka_2020.pdf (1,02 MB)
MD5: DDC1E6615A36C63EC77B98DD22CCD430
PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/9fe13bf6-42d3-447f-8cd6-f8a1dd3aca86
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:FVV - Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security
Abstract:Delo policistov je zelo odgovorno in zahtevno. Vsaka situacija zahteva od policista trezno presojo, pravilno odločitev, upoštevanje navodil in skrb, da bodo vpleteni izpolnili njegova navodila. Z zakonom so določena pravila kako in na kakšen način policist izvaja svoja pooblastila. Z upoštevanjem pravil iz policijskega kodeksa pa policist upošteva etična in moralna načela. Čeprav se policist trudi po najboljših močeh izpolniti svoja navodila in uresničiti pooblastila, še vedno lahko situacije privedejo do tega, da bi vpletene osebe smatrale policistovo delo za nekorektno. V takem primeru je zakonsko določeno, da ima ta oseba možnost pritožbe in več različnih postopkov, kjer se obravnava dotični primer. Sam postopek ne more izbrisati kazni ali policistovega pooblastila, temveč se v tem postopku preverja pravilno ravnanje uradne osebe, torej policista v dani situaciji. V polletnih in letnih poročilih policije so opisani tudi takšni primeri pritožb in njihova rešitev oz. zaključek. Postopek preverjanja pravilne izvedbe policistovih pooblastil je odvisen od tega kakšno in kolikšno silo je uporabil policist v postopku, kakšne so okoliščine, ali je v situacijo vpletenih več oseb ali zgolj ena. Najlažja in najbolj smiselna možnost reševanja pritožb je pomiritveni postopek, kjer se vpletene osebe odzovejo povabilu na postopek in zadevo skušajo rešiti z dogovorom. V kolikor je ne uspejo zaključiti to pomeni, da se zadeva ureja naprej po drugih postopkih. V vsakem primeru predstavljajo javnost in vpleteni civilisti v izvajanje policijskih postopkov nadzor; gre za enega od načinov nadzora policistov, ki je seveda smiseln in tudi potreben, da je izvajanje policijskih pooblastil kar se da korektno.
Keywords:diplomske naloge, pritožbeni postopek, pomiritveni postopek, zakon, pooblastila, prekršitev pooblastil, Ministrstvo za notranje zadeve
Place of publishing:Ljubljana
Place of performance:Ljubljana
Publisher:[M. Ceglar]
Year of publishing:2020
Year of performance:2020
Number of pages:VI, 44 str.
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-76272 New window
UDC:351.74(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:17852163 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:PIBFU6IZ
Publication date in DKUM:03.06.2020
Views:1206
Downloads:160
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:FVV
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Review of the regulation of complaints procedures against police work
Abstract:Police officers have a very responsible and unique work, because every situation requires police officers to make a sound judgment, right decision and follow the instructions as well as ensuring, that people who are involved in the situation fulfill the given instructions. The law presents the rules for how a police officer performs his or her authority. The police officers must follow the police code, which provides ethical and moral principles. Although the police officer does his best to comply with his instructions and to exercise his authority, situations can still lead to the point that the persons involved consider the police officer's performance inappropriate. In such case, the law offers a possibility that a person can appeal in several different ways. The procedure itself cannot erase the penalty or the police officer's authority. However, the procedure is checked to establish if the police officer took the right decisions and actions. The cases of such situations can be found in semi-annual an annual police reports, which carry the information about how the complaints were closed. The procedure for verifying the correct exercise of a police officer's authority depends on how and to what extent was the force used by the police officer in the procedure, the circumstances and whether several persons or just one were involved in the situation. One of the easiest and most reasonable way of solving such complaints is a conciliation process. The persons involved are invited to come to the procedure and try to resolve the matter by agreement. If that procedure is not successful, the complaint must be solved in other ways. The public and the civilians represent the public control of the police officers. By doing so, they demand, that police work is done appropriately.
Keywords:appeal, conciliation, law, powers, violation of authority, Ministry of the interior affairs


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica