| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:Predkazenski postopek danes in jutri : diplomsko delo univerzitetnega študijskega programa Varstvoslovje
Authors:ID Grašič, Tara (Author)
ID Žaberl, Miroslav (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf UN_Grasic_Tara_2020.pdf (1,13 MB)
MD5: 2C9CA0C89DE6EBB6A5F6532837BF2011
PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/9bc42453-1b3d-4e48-9e14-1a9db282c678
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:FVV - Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security
Abstract:Kazenski postopek v Sloveniji je razdeljen na dva dela, predhodni in kazenski postopek, pri čemer se predhodni postopek še naprej deli na dve fazi in sicer na neformalni predkazenski postopek in formalno sodno preiskavo. Trije glavni subjekti predkazenskega postopka so policija, državni tožilec in preiskovalni sodnik. Policija v vlogi organa odkrivanja pridobiva informacije, ki služijo kot podlaga za odločitev državnega tožilca o tem, ali bo uvedel kazenski pregon ali ne. Državni tožilec ima vlogo organa pregona in kot dominus litis predkazenskega postopka nadzoruje celoten postopek in skrbi za njegovo delovanje. Predkazenski sodnik ima v tem delu postopka dvojno vlogo in sicer opravlja preiskovalno in garantno funkcijo, ki pa si med seboj nasprotujeta. Predkazenski postopek v osnovi opredeljuje Zakon o kazenskem postopku, njegovi posamezni deli pa so porazdeljeni tudi po drugih zakonskih in podzakonskih aktih, pri čemer noben ne ponuja njegove zaokrožene opredelitve. Skozi zgodovino je predkazenski postopek doživel kar nekaj sprememb, ki so vanj vnesle številna nasprotja in danes onemogočajo njegovo učinkovitost. V ureditvi predkazenskega postopka tako najdemo številne pomanjkljivosti, pri čemer se največje kažejo v formalnih in neformalnih policijskih pooblastilih, medsebojnih razmerjih treh glavnih subjektov, neracionalni porazdelitvi postopka in pomanjkljivi opredelitvi celotnega predkazenskega postopka. V diplomski nalogi smo pregledali in se kritično opredelili do današnjega predkazenskega postopka ter izpostavili njegove najbolj kritične točke. Skušali smo tudi odpraviti njegove pomanjkljivosti in prikazati predkazenski postopek v prihodnosti.
Keywords:diplomske naloge, predkazenski postopek, policija, državni tožilec, preiskovalni sodnik, Zakon o kazenskem postopku
Place of publishing:Ljubljana
Place of performance:Ljubljana
Publisher:[T. Grašič]
Year of publishing:2020
Year of performance:2020
Number of pages:VI, 43 str.
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-76855 New window
UDC:351.741(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:29692675 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:YWYQR6L7
Publication date in DKUM:24.09.2020
Views:1356
Downloads:234
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:FVV
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Pre-Trial criminal procedure in the present and in the future
Abstract:Slovenian criminal procedure is divided into two parts, the preliminary and criminal procedure. The preliminary procedure is furthermore divided into two phases, the informal pre-trial criminal procedure and formal investigation phase. Three key actors in the pre-trial criminal procedure are the police, the public prosecutor and the examining judge. The police represents the body responsible for detecting the criminal activities and is in charge of providing the information that the public prosecutor needs for his decision, whether to initiate the prosecution or not. The public prosecutor represents the body of prosecution, who, as dominus litis of the pre-trial criminal procedure, supervises and guides the procedure. The examining judge`s role nowadays is ambiguous, because he has an investigative and judicial task, which are incompatible. The pre-trial criminal procedure is largely defined in the Criminal Procedure Act, however some of its parts are described in other statutory acts, none of which offer a complete definition. Throughout the history, pre-trial criminal procedure endured a lot of changes, which brought many contrasts to the procedure and are blocking its efficiency. We can find many drawbacks in the regulation of today`s procedure, wherein the biggest ones appear to be formal and informal police authorisations, relations between the three key actors, irrationally divided procedure and insufficient regulation of the entire pre-trial criminal procedure. In the thesis we examined and critically reviewed today`s pre-trial criminal procedure and exposed its most critical spots. We tried to eliminate its drawbacks and show the regulation of the pre-trial criminal procedure in the future.
Keywords:pre-trial procedure, police, public prosecutor, examining judge (magistrate), Criminal Procedure Act


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica