| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:Digitalni dokazi v kazenskem postopku in privilegij zoper samoobtožbo : diplomsko delo visokošolskega študijskega programa Varnost in policijsko delo
Authors:ID Januš, Tara (Author)
ID Žaberl, Miroslav (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf VS_Janus_Tara_2020.pdf (963,26 KB)
MD5: A3E4C151B749081A734EDFB2CAC8BB7A
PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/2ffa9892-22b7-47cd-8bcb-ee01bf599313
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:FVV - Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security
Abstract:Hiter razvoj tehnologij prinaša spremembe tudi na področje kazenskega prava. Organi kazenskega pregona se srečujejo z vedno več dokazi v digitalni obliki. Pridobivanje digitalnih dokazov jim ovira uporaba enkripcije. Enkripcija spremeni podatke iz berljive oblike v neberljivo, za dekriptiranje pa je potreben ključ oz. geslo. Pred predajo gesla osebe ščiti privilegij zoper samoobtožbo. Privilegij zoper samoobtožbo je pravica posameznika, da ne priča proti samemu sebi. V diplomski nalogi bomo preverili, kako je privilegij v povezavi z digitalnimi dokazi urejen v Republiki Sloveniji, Veliki Britaniji in Združenih državah Amerike. Biometrična enkripcija za ključ uporablja biometrične podatke, kot so prstni odtis, očesna šarenica ipd. Skozi diplomsko nalogo ugotavljamo, ali biometrični podatki uživajo enako zaščito pod privilegijem zoper samoobtožbo. Predstavljena bo Doktrina testimonialne biometrije, ki predstavlja eno izmed možnih rešitev dileme biometrične enkripcije. V povezavi z Doktrino vnaprej določenega zaključka (The Foregone Conclusion Doctrine), bomo ugotavljali kdaj lahko oblast zahteva predajo gesel, biometričnih podatkov, ali dekriptirano vsebino elektronske naprave. Tehnologija neprestano napreduje, storilci kaznivih dejanj pa so eni prvih, ki po njej posežejo. Za učinkovito reševanje kaznivih dejanj, se morajo prilagajati organi kazenskega pregona in zakonodaja.
Keywords:diplomske naloge, digitalni dokazi, privilegij zoper samoobtožbo, enkripcija, biometrična enkripcija
Place of publishing:Ljubljana
Place of performance:Ljubljana
Publisher:[T. Januš]
Year of publishing:2020
Year of performance:2020
Number of pages:V, 37 str.
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-76971 New window
UDC:343.14(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:28865539 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:CALGKNZZ
Publication date in DKUM:18.09.2020
Views:1191
Downloads:94
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:FVV
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Digital evidence in criminal procedure and the privilege against self-incrimination
Abstract:Exceedingly fast technological development has brought changes to the field of criminal law. Law enforcement agencies have been dealing with increasing amount of digital evidence. Acquiring said evidence has been hindered by encryption. Encryption changes readable text to unreadable and changing it back requires decryption which can only be done by a key or a password. Compulsion of passwords is protected under the privilege against self-incrimination. Privilege against self-incrimination is the right to not stand as a witness against oneself. In the undergraduate thesis we will study the regulation of digital evidence in relation to the privilege against self-incrimination in Republic of Slovenia, Great Britain and United States of America. Biometric encryption uses biometric data such as fingerprint or iris scan, instead of a key or a password. Through the thesis we will establish if the biometric data enjoys same protection as passwords under the privilege against self-incrimination. Testimonial biometrics doctrine will be introduced as one of possible solutions to the dilemma of biometric encryption. In correlation to The Foregone Conclusion Doctrine we will ascertain when the government can demand surrender of passwords, biometric data or decrypted contents of electronic devices. Technology is constantly advancing and perpetrators of criminal acts are the first to use it. Law enforcement and legislation needs to adapt to be able to solve crimes efficiently.
Keywords:digital evidence, privilege against self-incrimination, encryption, biometric encryption


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica