| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:Analiza slikovnega gradiva v učbenikih za spoznavanje okolja in družbo
Authors:ID Kidrič, Vanesa (Author)
ID Lazički, Barbara (Author)
ID Hus, Vlasta (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
ID Jančič Hegediš, Polona (Comentor)
Files:.pdf MAG_Kidric_Vanesa_2020.pdf (8,40 MB)
MD5: D0FDCB9D02DD2F89B70B320963ECF11C
PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/6779359b-af3a-4ef0-8db2-6b7b3e11f724
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Typology:2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:PEF - Faculty of Education
Abstract:Magistrska naloga z naslovom Analiza slikovnega gradiva v učbenikih za spoznavanje okolja in družbo je sestavljena iz dveh delov, in sicer iz teoretičnega in empiričnega dela. V teoretičnem delu so predstavljeni učbenik, njegova vloga in oblikovanje, slikovno gradivo v učbenikih in znanstvene ugotovitve o le-tem. V empiričnem delu smo z analizo učbenikov raziskali kakovost in verodostojnost slikovnega gradiva v učbenikih za spoznavanje okolja v 1., 2. in 3. razredu ter družbe v 4. in 5. razredu. Analizirali smo založbe, ki so na slovenskem trgu najbolj zastopane, in sicer Rokus Klett, DZS, Modrijan in Mladinska knjiga, po vnaprej zastavljenih kriterijih. Ugotovili smo, da imata glede na kriterije založbi Rokus Klett in Modrijan najkvalitetnejše predstavljeno slikovno gradivo v učbenikih za spoznavanje okolja, največ pomanjkljivosti pa založba Mladinska knjiga. Pri predmetu družba je po kakovosti slikovnega gradiva najbolj izstopala založba Modrijan, medtem ko je največ pomanjkljivosti v učbenikih založbe Mladinska knjiga. Ugotovili smo, da razmerje med besedilom in slikovnim gradivom v učbenikih ni pri vseh založbah ustrezno glede na razred in da se kakovost slikovnega gradiva razlikuje tudi po razredih. V vseh analiziranih učbenikih so od slikovnega gradiva pričakovano najbolj zastopane fotografije in slike. Ker so vsi učbeniki potrjeni, je prihajalo do zelo majhnih odstopanj med založbami in razredi.
Keywords:učbenik, slikovno gradivo, založba, spoznavanje okolja, družba
Place of publishing:Maribor
Publisher:[V. Kidrič, B. Lazički]
Year of publishing:2020
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-77083 New window
UDC:502.1(075)(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:30791427 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:IEDKIDYO
Publication date in DKUM:07.10.2020
Views:1601
Downloads:310
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:PEF
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Licences

License:CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Description:The most restrictive Creative Commons license. This only allows people to download and share the work for no commercial gain and for no other purposes.
Licensing start date:16.08.2020

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Analysis visual materials in different textbooks of environmental studies and social studies in primary school
Abstract:The thesis “Analyzing Visual Materials in Different Textbooks of Environmental Studies and Social Studies in Primary School” consists of two parts, theoretical and empirical one. Theoretical part describes the term textbook, its role, visual materials in textbooks and important scientific facts about the latter. Empirical part analyses quality and validity of visual materials in different textbooks, researching the textbooks of environmental studies in 1st, 2nd and 3rd grade, and social studies in 4th and 5th grade. The analysis includes the biggest Slovenian publishers: Rokus Klett, DZS, Modrijan and Mladinska knjiga. Considering the criteria, we can say that two publishers Rokus Klett and Modrijan have the best presentations of visual materials in textbooks for environmental studies. On the other hand, Mladinska knjiga has the biggest deficit. Regarding social studies, Modrijan stands out with the highest quality of visual materials, while Mladinska knjiga represents the lowest result. Our research showed that the ratio between text and visual material in textbooks is not appropriate at every publisher. Furthermore, the quality of visual material varies from one class to another. All analyzed textbooks include mostly images and pictures, as expected. Since all the analyzed textbooks are confirmed by the government, there are not many deviations in publishers or classes.
Keywords:textbook, visual material, publisher, environmental studies, social studies


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica