| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:Električni paralizator kot prisilno sredstvo : magistrsko delo
Authors:ID Ogrin, Klemen (Author)
ID Žaberl, Miroslav (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf MAG_Ogrin_Klemen_2020.pdf (1,22 MB)
MD5: 30D68E8B68F87707DCA7B110A6EA8F41
PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/f8114735-a90e-45ec-bbc4-175598a86b91
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Typology:2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:FVV - Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security
Abstract:V magistrskem delu smo raziskovali uporabo električnega paralizatorja kot prisilnega sredstva. Zaradi aktualnih razprav o uvedbi uporabe električnega paralizatorja v slovensko policijo smo pozornost namenili delovanju električnega paralizatorja in učinkom njegove uporabe na človeško telo. S tem želimo stroki predstaviti vse vidike uporabe električnega paralizatorja. Prav tako smo uporabili izsledke različnih raziskav, ki so bile izvedene z namenom ugotoviti, ali je električni paralizator varno prisilno sredstvo. Tehnični vidiki delovanja električnega paralizatorja so pokazali, da je tovrstno prisilno sredstvo varno za uporabo, saj je proizvajalec vgradil varnostne komponente. Kljub temu je treba biti pri uporabi previden, saj je v preteklosti prihajalo do smrti storilca. Rezultati raziskav so pokazali, da ni zanesljivih medicinskih dokazov, ki bi potrjevali smrtonosnost uporabe električnega paralizatorja. Prav tako so v primerih iz prakse, ki jih omenjamo v magistrskem delu, obdukcije preminulih pokazale, da za smrt ni bila kriva uporaba električnega paralizatorja, ampak so na to vplivali drugi dejavniki. Raziskave so prav tako pokazale, da je uporaba varna tudi zoper ljudi, ki imajo srčni spodbujevalnik ali pa trpijo za kroničnimi boleznimi. Ugotovili smo tudi, da napadi na policiste v Sloveniji v zadnjih letih upadajo in da policisti strelno orožje uporabijo enkrat ali dvakrat letno. To pomeni, da za slovensko policijo uvedba električnega paralizatorja kot prisilnega sredstva ni smiselna, saj zakonodaja za njegovo uporabo zahteva popolnoma enake pogoje kot za uporabo strelnega orožja. V danem primeru bi bilo zato treba napisati bolj smiselne pogoje uporabe ali pa pri obstoječih zakonskih pogojih v patruljah določiti enega policista, ki bo namesto strelnega orožja nosil paralizator, medtem ko bo drugi tako kot sedaj nosil strelno orožje, saj električni paralizator zaradi narave svojega delovanja ne more zamenjati strelnega orožja.
Keywords:policija, policijsko delo, policijski postopki, policijska pooblastila, prisilna sredstva, električni paralizator, magistrska dela
Place of publishing:Ljubljana
Place of performance:Ljubljana
Publisher:[K. Ogrin]
Year of publishing:2020
Year of performance:2020
Number of pages:V, 61 str.
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-77384 New window
UDC:351.741(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:34603779 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:Q8EPKSVK
Publication date in DKUM:28.10.2020
Views:1567
Downloads:227
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:FVV
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Taser as police asset
Abstract:In our disertation we were researching Taser as police asset. Due to current negotiations about allowing Slovenian police officers use of Taser, we focused on mechanical features and on impacts that the use of Taser can have on human body. The purpose of our research is to show people, who are dealing with dilemas of initiation, different aspects. We have used outcome of different researches, whose purpose is to show us, if Taser is safe to use as a police asset. Mechanical asspects showed us, that police officers can safely use Taser, because it has security components built in it. Although there were cases in the past, where people died from use of Taser. Nevertheless researches show us, that there are no reliable medical evidence, which suggest that Taser can kill people. Additionaly cases from our disertation suggest that people, who died after they have been exposed to Taser, had other medical problems. Furthermore we have found out from various reseraches, that the use of Taser is also safe for people with pacemakers and other chronical diseases. We have also found out, that attacks on Slovenian police officers are decreasing in the last few years and that they use firearm once or twice a year. From that point of view the initiation of Taser is not necessary, because the law suggests same conditions for use of Taser and firearm. In that case it would be more reasonable to rewrite those conditions or one of the patrol officers gets to carry a Taser and the other gets to carry a firearm, because Taser can not switch places with firearm.
Keywords:Taser, firearm, pacemaker, police asset, Slovenian police


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica