| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:Primerjalna analiza dveh angleških prevodov splošnega dela Kazenskega zakonika Republike Slovenije : magistrsko delo
Authors:ID Hussein, Samer (Author)
ID Kaloh Vid, Natalia (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
ID Kučiš, Vlasta (Comentor)
Files:.pdf MAG_Hussein_Samer_2022.pdf (1,44 MB)
MD5: A2F6ED3282BC6830334BF1D9969019B5
PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/654483db-10e9-4ff1-9ee3-5f8c259ab55a
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Typology:2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:FF - Faculty of Arts
Abstract:Tema zaključnega dela magistrskega študija Prevajanja in tolmačenja je primerjalna analiza prevodne in jezikovne ustreznosti ter enakovrednosti prvega (2008) in drugega (2021) angleškega prevoda Kazenskega zakonika Republike Slovenije. Osredotočili smo na vsebinsko učinkovitost dosedanjih prevodov pravnih terminoloških izrazov s področja kazenskega prava v angleški jezik, njihovo jezikovno in pomensko ustreznost, enakovrednost (ekvivalentnost) ter prevajalske izzive, s katerimi se prevajalci srečujejo v praksi, kadar prevajajo strokovna besedila s področja zakonodaje, podzakonskih aktov, pravilnikov in podobnih pravnih besedil. Pri teoretični raziskavi smo se oprli na jezikoslovno teorijo ali teorijo ekvivalence ter znanstvene poglede in paradigme sledečih prevodoslovcev: Toury (1986), Chesterman (1997/2016) in Snell-Hornby (1988). Obenem smo uporabili znanstveno literaturo, namenjeno prevajanju pravnih besedil (Cao (2007), Kocbek (2011), Mattila (2006), Tiersma (1999)). Temeljne metode, uporabljene pri empiričnem raziskovalnem delu, so primerjalna, prevajalska in analitična metoda. Razen že omenjene prevodne ustreznosti smo se osredotočili tudi na jezikovne izboljšave in odstopanja med prevodoma. Prevajalske rešitve prevajalcev obeh besedil, ki sta bila predmet raziskovalnega dela, smo obrazložili in znanstveno utemeljili. Za potrebe prevodne in terminološke analize smo kot glavni angleški terminološki vir uporabili Oxfordov pravni slovar (Oxford Dictionary of Law – Oxford University Press, 2018). Gre za globalno uveljavljen terminološki slovar, ki ga uporabljajo prevajalci ter pravniki. Za analizo slovenske pravne terminologije smo uporabili Pravni terminološki slovar (ZRC SAZU, 2018).
Keywords:kazensko pravo, slovenska pravna terminologija, angleška pravna terminologija, pravni jezik, prevajanje, medkulturna komunikacija
Place of publishing:Maribor
Place of performance:Maribor
Publisher:[S. Hussein]
Year of publishing:2022
Number of pages:1 spletni vir (1 datoteka PDF (V, 83 str.))
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-81911 New window
UDC:81\'25(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:117481219 New window
Publication date in DKUM:05.08.2022
Views:1125
Downloads:89
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:FF
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Licences

License:CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Description:The most restrictive Creative Commons license. This only allows people to download and share the work for no commercial gain and for no other purposes.
Licensing start date:16.06.2022

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Comparative analysis of two english translations of the general part of the Criminal code of the Republic of Slovenia
Abstract:The master thesis focuses on a comparative analysis of linguistic adequacy and equivalence of the former (2008) and updated (2021) English translations of the general part of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Slovenia. The emphasis is on a contextual relevance of the legal terminological expressions from the field of criminal law into English language, linguistic and semantic adequacy, equivalence as well as translation problems and strategies that translators face when translating legislation, laws, regulations, etc. In theoretical research we relied on linguistics or equivalence theory in addition to scientific viewpoints and paradigms of the following translatologists: Toury (1986), Chesterman (1997/2016) and Snell-Hornby (1988). Legal language-related scientific literature by Cao (2007), Kocbek (2011), Mattila (2006) and Tiersma (1999) was also used. During our research process we relied on comparative, translation and analysis methods. We also focused on linguistic improvement and deviation between translations. Translators’ solutions were analysed and explained. We chose the Oxford Dictionary of Law ( Oxford University Press, 2018) as our primary source for English legal terminology as it is one of the major internationally recognized legal dictionaries. Slovenian Legal Dictionary Pravni terminološki slovar (ZRC SAZU, 2018) was chosen as our legal terminology source in Slovenian language.
Keywords:criminal law, Slovenian legal terminology, English legal terminology, legal language, translation, intercultural communication


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica