| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:Primerjava upravne in vojaške strukture Kitajske v času dinastije Han z Rimskim cesarstvom : magistrsko delo
Authors:ID Flis, Janez (Author)
ID Maver, Aleš (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf MAG_Flis_Janez_2022.pdf (1,07 MB)
MD5: 724A14D9CC0DA29562190A9736CEF7FF
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Typology:2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:FF - Faculty of Arts
Abstract:Dinastija Han je Kitajski vladala med letom 202 pr. n. št. in letom 220. Njena več kot štiristoletna vladavina je označena kot zlato obdobje kitajske zgodovine. Predstavlja namreč obdobje miru, stabilnosti in vsesplošnega družbenega napredka. V tem času je prišlo do poenotenja obsežnega območja in nadaljnje širitve cesarstva proti zahodu. Na ta način je Kitajska, sicer tradicionalno izolirana pred svetom, prišla v stik z ljudstvi osrednje Azije, posredno pa tudi v stik z Rimskim cesarstvom. Slednje se je oblikovala konec 1. stol. pr. n. št. in tako soobstajalo s Kitajsko v času dinastije Han slabih 250 let. Primerjava upravnih in vojaških struktur obeh cesarstev razkriva, da med njima obstajajo določene podobnosti, kot npr. pri vlogi cesarja ter pri sistemu javne uprave. Obe cesarstvi sta izrabili učinkovit birokratski aparat za izvajanje nadzora, kar je posledično krepilo cesarsko oblast. Hkrati pa obstajajo precejšnje razlike na področjih vlade, zakonodaje in pravosodja ter vojske. Večina teh razlik izhaja iz družbeno ter kulturno pogojenih ideoloških razlik, ki obe območji zaznamujejo še danes. Cesarstvi sta bili med seboj povezani preko trgovine, ki je potekala po sistemu trgovskih poti oz. t. i. svilne ceste, ki je s Kitajske prek osrednje Azije vodila na Bližnji vzhod in nato v Evropo. Toda to trgovanje je bilo po večini posredno in ni omogočalo neposrednega stika med cesarstvoma, ki ga ni bilo niti na diplomatski ravni vse do 2. polovice 2. stoletja.
Keywords:Kitajska, Rimsko cesarstvo, dinastija Han, upravna struktura.
Geographic coverage:Rim; Kitajska;
Temporal coverage:202 pr. n. št.-220 n. št.;
Place of publishing:Maribor
Place of performance:Maribor
Publisher:[J. Flis]
Year of publishing:2022
Number of pages:1 spletni vir (1 datoteka PDF (V, 111 str.))
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-83167 New window
UDC:94(315)"-202/220"(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:124514307 New window
Publication date in DKUM:06.10.2022
Views:833
Downloads:60
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:FF
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Licences

License:CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Description:The most restrictive Creative Commons license. This only allows people to download and share the work for no commercial gain and for no other purposes.
Licensing start date:22.09.2022

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:A comparison of administrative and military structure of China during the Han dynasty with the Roman Empire
Abstract:The Han Dynasty ruled China from 202 BC to 220. Its more than four-hundred-year reign is characterized as the golden period of Chinese history. Namely, it represents a period of peace, stability, and general social progress. During this time, the unification of a vast area and the further expansion of the empire towards the west took place. In this way, China, otherwise traditionally isolated from the world, came into contact with the peoples of Central Asia and, indirectly, also with the Roman Empire. The latter was formed at the end of the 1st century BC and, thus, coexisted with China during the Han Dynasty for just under 250 years. A comparison of the administrative and military structures of the two empires reveals that there are certain similarities between them, e.g. in the role of the emperor and the system of public administration. Both empires used an efficient bureaucratic apparatus to exercise control, which, in turn, strengthened imperial power. At the same time, there are significant differences in the fields of government, law, and justice, as well as the military. Most of these differences derive from socially and culturally determined ideological differences that characterize both areas even today. The two empires were connected through trade which took place along the system of trade routes or the so-called Silk Road, which led from China through Central Asia to the Middle East and then to Europe. However, this trade was mostly indirect and did not allow direct contact between the two empires which did not even exist on a diplomatic level until the second half of the second century.
Keywords:China, Roman Empire, Han Dynasty, administrative structure.


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica