| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:Indukcija poroda s Propess vaginalnim sistemom v primerjavi z indukcijo poroda s Prostin vaginalno tableto pri predčasnem razpoku plodovih ovojev v terminu
Authors:ID Anzeljc, Veronika (Author)
ID Mujezinović, Faris (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf DOK_Anzeljc_Veronika_2023.pdf (1,95 MB)
MD5: B3C894975DB2D8D490B7D56DFA178E6C
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Doctoral dissertation
Typology:2.08 - Doctoral Dissertation
Organization:MF - Faculty of Medicine
Abstract:Cilj raziskave je bil primerjati perinatalni izid in porodne intervale po sprožitvi poroda z vaginalno tableto Prostin v primerjavi z vaginalnim sistemom Propess pri nosečnicah s predčasnim razpokom plodovih ovojev (PROM) v terminu. Zasnova: vzporedna randomizirana kontrolirana raziskava z računalniško ustvarjeno tabelo za izbiro zdravila. Kraj izvedbe: Univerzitetni klinični center Maribor, Slovenija. Preiskovanke: Skupno 205 zdravih nosečnic z enoplodno nosečnostjo v glavični vstavi s PROM-om v terminu. Raziskava: sprožitev poroda z vaginalnim sistemom Propess (raziskovalna skupina) v primerjavi s tabletami Prostin (kontrolna skupina). Glavni cilji: stopnja neuspešnih sprožitev, zapleti pri porodu, časovni intervali med PROM-om, sprožitvijo, začetkom aktivne faze in porodom. Rezultati: Prostin so prejele 104 nosečnice, Propess pa 101 nosečnica. Neuspešne sprožitve v skupinah Prostin in Propess so bile 8/104 (7,7 %) oziroma 5/101 (5,0 %) (p = 0,80). Nepravilnosti pri porodu so bile redke in primerljive med skupinama. Delež carskih rezov v skupini Prostin in Propess je bil 4/96 (4,2 %) oziroma 6/96 (6,3 %). Časovni intervali poroda so bili med skupinami primerljivi. Sklepi: Pri nosečnostih v terminu s PROM-om je vaginalni sistem Propess varna in učinkovita izbira za sprožitev poroda.
Keywords:prezgodnji razpok mehurja, sprožitev poroda, randomizirana kontrolirana raziskava, Propess vaginalni sistem, Prostin vaginalna tableta
Place of publishing:Maribor
Year of publishing:2023
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-83702 New window
COBISS.SI-ID:159380739 New window
Publication date in DKUM:20.07.2023
Views:955
Downloads:160
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:MF
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Licences

License:CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Description:The most restrictive Creative Commons license. This only allows people to download and share the work for no commercial gain and for no other purposes.
Licensing start date:24.01.2023

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:A Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Induction of Labour with the Propess Vaginal System to the Prostin Vaginal Tablet in Premature Rupture of Membranes at Term
Abstract:Aim: To compare the perinatal outcome and delivery intervals after the induction of labour with the Prostin vaginal tablet versus the Propess vaginal system in pregnant women with term-PROM. Design: One centre paralleled randomised controlled trial with a computer-generated table to allocate treatments. Setting: University Medical Centre in Slovenia. Participants: A total of 205 singleton healthy pregnant women with term-PROM. Intervention: Induction of labour with the Propess vaginal system (intervention group) versus Prostin tablets (control group). Main outcomes: The rate of failed inductions, complications in labour, time intervals between the PROM, induction, the beginning of the active phase, and delivery. Results: A total of 104 patients received Prostin, and 101 patients received Propess. Induction failure rates in the Prostin and the Propess groups were 8/104 (7.7%) and 5/101 (5.0%), respectively (p = 0.80). Delivery abnormalities were uncommon and comparable across the groups. The rates of caesarean sections in the Prostin and Propess groups were 4/96 (4.2%) and 6/96 (6.3%), respectively. The delivery intervals were comparable across the groups. Conclusions: In term-PROM pregnancies, the Propess vaginal system is a safe and effective option for inducing labour.
Keywords:premature rupture of membranes at term, induction of labour, a randomised controlled trial, Propess vaginal system, Prostin vaginal tablet


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica