Sorodna pravica založnikov medijskih publikacij : magistrsko delo

Jovanović, Nikola

| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

First page > Show document

Show document

Title:	Sorodna pravica založnikov medijskih publikacij : magistrsko delo
Authors:	ID Jovanović, Nikola (Author) ID Repas, Martina (Mentor) More about this mentor...
Files:	MAG_Jovanovic_Nikola_2023.pdf (809,66 KB) MD5: A333873DB47E4BA9B534194676F7EB3B
Language:	Slovenian
Work type:	Master's thesis/paper
Typology:	2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:	PF - Faculty of Law
Abstract:	Magistrska naloga raziskuje koncept pravice založnikov medijskih publikacij in njene posledice v luči krize dobičkonosnosti v konvencionalni založniški industriji. Prav tako preučuje vpliv zbirateljev novic na založniško industrijo. Ker je uveljavitev nove sorodne pravice za založnike medijskih publikacij široko sprejeta kot možna rešitev za krizo v industriji, avtor raziskuje tudi vlogo in delovanje sorodnih pravic v 21. stoletju. Naloga nato kritično analizira glavne argumente, ki podpirajo in nasprotujejo sorodni pravici založnikov medijskih publikacij. Z analizo teh argumentov avtor zaključi, da sorodne pravice niso ustrezna rešitev za krizo, s katero se soočajo založniki medijskih publikacij. Glavni razlog za to je, da pravica ne naslavlja osnovnega problema neproporcionalne tržne prevlade največjih tehnoloških podjetij, kot so Google, Apple itd. V drugem delu naloge avtor preučuje pravico založnikov medijskih publikacij, kot je ta opredeljena v členu 15 Direktive (EU) 2019/790 Evropskega parlamenta in sveta o avtorski in sorodnih pravicah na enotnem digitalnem trgu in spremembi direktiv 96/9/ES in 2001/29/ES. Avtor poudarja inherentne omejitve pravice založnikov medijskih publikacij in njeno nesposobnost, da doseže glavni cilj reševanja krize v industriji. Poleg tega se naloga osredotoča na specifične določbe člena 15 (kot sta opredelitev pojmov zelo kratkih izvlečkov in ustrezen delež dohodka), ki poudarjajo glavne slabosti direktive in posledice, ki jih je prinesla implementacija direktive v državah članicah EU. Naloga ponuja vpoglede v smiselnost sorodne pravice založnikov medijskih publikacij in učinkovitost pristopa EU pri obvladovanju izzivov, s katerimi se sooča medijska industrija. Ugotovitve osvetljujejo pereče težave, povezane z založniško industrijo, ter prispevajo k trajajočemu razpravljanju o ustrezni ukrepih za podporo in zaščito založnikov tiska v digitalni dobi.
Keywords:	medijska industrija, zbiratelji novic, založniki medijskih publikacij, medijske publikacije, pravo intelektualne lastnine, sorodne pravice, DSM Direktiva
Place of publishing:	Maribor
Place of performance:	Maribor
Publisher:	N. Jovanović
Year of publishing:	2023
Number of pages:	1 spletni vir (1 datoteka PDF (69 str.))
PID:	20.500.12556/DKUM-84557
UDC:	347.78(043.3)
COBISS.SI-ID:	163820803
Note:	Sistemske zahteve: Acrobat reader
Publication date in DKUM:	08.09.2023
Views:	491
Downloads:	111
Metadata:
Categories:	PF
:	Copy citation

Average score:	(0 votes)
Your score:	Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:

Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Licences

License:	CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

Link:	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:	This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.
Licensing start date:	20.06.2023

Secondary language

Language:	English
Title:	Press publisher`s right
Abstract:	The master's thesis investigates the concept of the press publishers right and its consequences in the light of the crisis of profitability in the conventional publishing industry. It also examines the impact of news aggregators on the publishing industry. As the introduction of a new neighbouring right for press publishers is widely accepted as a possible solution to the crisis in the publishing industry, the author also explores the role and operation of neighbouring rights in the 21st century. The assignment then critically analyzes the main arguments that support and oppose the press publishers right. Analyzing these arguments, the author concludes that neighbouring rights are not an adequate solution to the crisis faced by publishers of media publications. The main reason for this is that the press publishers right does not address the underlying problem of the disproportionate market dominance of the biggest tech companies like Google, Apple, etc. In the second part of the assignment, the author examines the press publishers right, as defined in Article 15 of Directive (EU) 2019/790 of the European Parliament and of the Council on copyright and related rights in the single digital market and the amendment of Directives 96/9/EC and 2001/29 /EC. The author emphasizes the inherent limitations of the press publishers right and its inability to achieve the main goal of solving the crisis in the industry. In addition, the assignment focuses on the specific provisions of Article 15 (such as the definition of very short extracts and the appropriate share of income), which highlight the main weaknesses of the directive and the consequences brought about by the implementation of the directive in EU member states. The task offers insights into the reasonableness of the press publishers right and the effectiveness of the EU's approach in managing the challenges faced by the media industry. The findings shed light on pressing issues related to the publishing industry and contribute to the ongoing debate about appropriate measures to support and protect print publishers in the digital age.
Keywords:	publishing industry, news aggregators, press publishers, press publications intellectual property law, neighbouring rights, DSM Directive

Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)

0 - 0 / 0

There are no comments!

Back