| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:Problematika sodnega izvedeništva pri ugotavljanju medicinske napake : magistrsko delo
Authors:ID Vogrinec, Eva (Author)
ID Kraljić, Suzana (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf MAG_Vogrinec_Eva_2023.pdf (999,92 KB)
MD5: 339515D1AE228DBE99B0586D73342C32
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Typology:2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:PF - Faculty of Law
Abstract:Zdravje in življenje sta nenadomestljivi dobrini in sta visoko varovani tako na ustavni kot zakonski ravni. Zdravniki v ti naši dobrini vsakodnevno posegajo pri svojem delu, zato je še toliko pomembneje, da ravnajo v skladu s skrbnostjo, ki se od njih zahteva, to je s skrbnostjo dobrega strokovnjaka. Pravna teorija in sodna praksa sta enotni, da zdravnik ne ravna kot bi moral, kadar je poslabšanje zdravja pacienta posledica njegovega strokovno nepravilnega ravnanja ali kadar je ravnanje po strokovni plati sicer neoporečno, vendar pacient v poseg ni privolil. Medicinske napake se dogajajo pogosto in osebe, ki so žrtve le teh, želijo zadoščanje za posledice. Zadoščanje iščejo skozi zapletene sodne postopke, kjer pa je za ugotavljanje odgovora na vprašanje, ali je do medicinske napake res prišlo, potrebna vključitev sodnega izvedenca medicinske stroke. Izvedenci medicinske stroke imajo v sodnih postopkih velik pomen, saj s svojim mnenjem vplivajo na končno odločitev sodišča. Kot strokovnjaki nudijo strokovno pomoč sodišču pri zadevah, za katera sodnik nima zadostnega znanja. Zato je še toliko pomembneje, da je izvedensko mnenje napisano strokovno neoporečno in objektivno, saj bo sodišče večinoma na podlagi mnenja izdalo odločbo, ki pa lahko ima velik vpliv na tožnika kot oškodovanca.
Keywords:medicinska napaka, standard skrbnosti, pravdni postopek, izvedenec, izvedenec medicinske stroke, izvedeniško mnenje, odgovornost
Place of publishing:Maribor
Place of performance:Maribor
Publisher:E. Vogrinec
Year of publishing:2023
Number of pages:1 spletni vir (1 datoteka PDF (III, 63 str.))
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-85331 New window
UDC:347.964.4:61(043.3)
COBISS.SI-ID:163853315 New window
Note:Sistemske zahteve: Acrobat reader
Publication date in DKUM:08.09.2023
Views:836
Downloads:238
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:PF
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Licences

License:CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Description:The most restrictive Creative Commons license. This only allows people to download and share the work for no commercial gain and for no other purposes.
Licensing start date:27.08.2023

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:The issue of expert witness in determining medical malpractice
Abstract:Health and life are irreplaceable goods and are highly protected both at the constitutional and legal levels. Physicians intervene in these goods on a daily basis in their work, making it even more important for them to act with the required diligence, that is the diligence of a good professional. Legal theory and judicial practice are unanimous that a physicians do not act as they should when the deterioration of a patient's health is a result of their professional misconduct or when the action, although professionally faultless, was not consented to by the patient. Medical errors happen frequently, and individuals who are victims of these errors seek compensation for the consequences. They seek satisfaction through complex legal proceedings, where determining whether a medical error truly occurred requires the involvement of a court-appointed expert in the medical field. Medical experts play a significant role in legal proceedings, as their opinions influence the court's final decision. As professionals, they provide expert assistance to the court in matters where the judge lacks sufficient knowledge. Hence, it is all the more crucial for the expert opinion to be written in a professionally impeccable and objective manner, as the court will often base its ruling on the opinion, which can have a substantial impact on the plaintiff as the injured party.
Keywords:Medical error, Standard of Care, Civil proceedings, Expert Witness, Medical Expert Witness, Court Expertise, Liabiliy


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica