| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:Znanstvene in neznanstvene metode v forenzični psihologiji : magistrsko delo
Authors:ID Kern, Jan (Author)
ID Areh, Igor (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf MAG_Kern_Jan_2024.pdf (2,32 MB)
MD5: 7942E000A17ADEBCB740097B1AE1FEE7
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Typology:2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:FVV - Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security
Abstract:Forenzična psihologija je opisana kot interdisciplinarno področje, ki se ukvarja s preučevanjem in z razumevanjem psiholoških vidikov pravosodnega in policijskega sistema. V magistrskem delu so osvetljena in predstavljena tudi področja njenega delovanja ter njen razvoj. Podrobneje so razložene najpogosteje uporabljene metode iz forenzične psihologije: kognitivni intervju, poligraf, profiliranje, hipnoza, psihološka avtopsija in grafologija. Številne med njimi spremljajo očitki, da niso znanstveno podprte. Delo se posveča razmejitvi med znanostjo in neznanostjo. Številni poskusi iz zgodovine dokazujejo, kako težko je potegniti ločnico. Enotna in univerzalna opredelitev znanosti, ki bi naletela na širše priznavanje, tako še vedno ne obstaja. Namesto tega se delo osredotoča na iskanje najprimernejših meril, ki so v pomoč pri razlikovanju. Ta so skupek širokega in raznolikega pogleda na znanost. Razkrite so nekatere tehnike, s katerimi poskuša kvaziznanost zavajati laično in strokovno javnost. Metode iz psihološke forenzike so dobro raziskane in vrednotene na podlagi zastavljenih meril in nato kategorizirane v skupino znanstvenih ali neznanstvenih. Predstavljene so šibke točke metod, ki pomembno vplivajo na njihovo verodostojnost, in predlogi za prihodnje izboljšave. Cilj dela je pridobiti vpogled v poznavanje obravnavanega področja iz strani javnosti in njihovo stališče o uporabi omenjenih metod. Raziskava vključuje 236 anketirancev z območja Slovenije. Razbrano je zelo dobro poznavanje forenzične psihologije in njenih metod. Ugotovljeno je, da javnost slabo ocenjuje, katere metode so znanstvene. Uspešno presojanje je zaznano zgolj v enem primeru od šestih. Rezultati kažejo na odobravanje uporabe znanstveno manj podprtih metod v forenzični psihologiji, z določenimi omejitvami.
Keywords:forenzična psihologija, znanstvene metode, neznanstvene metode, magistrska dela
Place of publishing:Ljubljana
Place of performance:Ljubljana
Publisher:J. Kern
Year of publishing:2024
Year of performance:2024
Number of pages:VII f., [74] str.
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-88489 New window
UDC:159.9:340.6(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:198242563 New window
Publication date in DKUM:10.06.2024
Views:484
Downloads:104
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:FVV
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Licences

License:CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Description:The most restrictive Creative Commons license. This only allows people to download and share the work for no commercial gain and for no other purposes.
Licensing start date:06.05.2024

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Scientific and unscientific methods in forensic psychology
Abstract:Forensic psychology is an interdisciplinary field concerned with researching and understanding the psychological aspects of the justice and police systems. As part of the assignment, the areas of its activity and its development are also highlighted and presented. The methods most commonly used in forensic psychology were explained in more detail: cognitive interviewing, polygraph, profiling, hypnosis, psychological autopsy and graphology. Many of them complain that they are not scientifically sound. This is about the distinction between science and ignorance. Many experiments from history prove how difficult it is to draw the dividing line. A uniform and universally valid definition of science, which would meet with broad acceptance, does not yet exist. Instead, the work concentrates on finding the most suitable criteria for making a distinction. They offer a broad and diverse view of science. Some of the techniques used by quasi-knowledge to mislead the lay and professional public have been uncovered. The methods of psychological forensics have been well researched and evaluated against established criteria and then categorized into a group of scientific or non-scientific methods. Weaknesses of the methods that have a significant impact on their credibility and suggestions for future improvements were presented. The aim of the assignment was to gain an insight into the public's knowledge of the field in question and their attitude towards the use of the methods mentioned. The survey included 236 respondents from Slovenia. The understanding of forensic psychology and its methods is good. It was found that the public overestimates which methods are scientific. A successful assessment was found in only one out of six cases. The results indicate that the use of less scientifically sound methods in forensic psychology is supported with certain limitations.
Keywords:science, non-science, forensic psychology, methods


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica